Hawaiian

It's quite obvious you are TOTALLY confused and have no idea what you are talking about.

You wrote "Clinton was found guilty"......."He committed perjury and was caught."

On March 4,2024, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled Colorado cannot ban Trump from the presidential ballot. While specifically naming Colorado it applies to all states. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-68280062

Since when has Congress the power given to the Judiciary. AFAIK, no court has ruled that Donald Trump has committed an act of INSURRECTION or REBELLION.

The sky ain't falling, although it seems as if you are wishing for it to happen.

Dirty politics at work. Nothing new.

He still hasn't found anyone to agree with his flawed definition.

What is your definition of a Maga cult member?

My bad. Should have said desires and not expectations. I did not expect you to make any detailed predictions. However, you did give a hint of what you think is coming down the road. IMO, I think Trump will do both good and bad for the country with the hope the bad not causing too much damage. And I wouldn't give too much credence that Musk will be the de facto president. They will soon tire of each other. Trump has too big of an ego to share the spotlight with him.

You and I know the impeachment process, but seems as there is one poster in particular who doesn't.

Why don't you list some of your expectations on domestic issues, such as illegal immigration and whatever else you think is important for the majority of the country?

You're losing it. I never claimed that you denied Trump won. You're hallucinating. Bizarre rather describes your comments.

Making an issue of the ELECTION that Trump won and Harris lost.

You're the one making an issue of it.

We all knew why you started this blog, but thought you would get over it by now. Evidently not.

Try looking up the definition of "convincing win".

Wrong. It doesn't have to be money.

Unfortunately, our judicial system is being used as a political tool. Sad.

"But there is some hope." But none for you.

Rhymes with Good Bye.

No, that is not what I am implying. That's your conclusion.

You were comparing native born Americans to undocumented aliens, so I thought you would understand my use of word "import" was a polite way of saying coming in illegally. I see I thought wrong. I have never, ever said I was against anyone coming here with the proper documentation. I have personally sponsored four individuals that have not run afoul of the law while in this country.

As far as I am concerned, we have enough homegrown criminals, so we don't need to "import" any more.

These types of violations are a worldwide problem and are on the upswing as marine resources shrink. Perhaps the biggest offender is China whose fishing fleets travel all over the globe poaching in everyone's backyard.

You weren't clear as to what part of his post you labeled as garbage. AFAIK the Facebook and Twitter examples are factual.