nauseus

that's the old pension system

OK then. From your previous posts I was assuming that you were still chipping in. If your checks have all indicated that you get the full whack since 2022 then I would be confident. But you can call them, as I said. Good luck.

Looks like you're good as long as you contribute until Jan 27.

Not now because you paid in already. You won't be able to contribute more, I think.

Maybe Billy Jeff spent the surplus on a new dress for Monica? And a make-up gift for Hilary? It wasn't much, after all.

An old habit that does no harm and which can still reduce damage to clutch, gearbox and brakes, especially in heavy vehicles.

Most light planes too. Unless they have a long (flat) runway and easy exit.

I edited my post but no matter. The forecast indicates a full pension so that's good. It looks like the two years top up must have been received and recorded OK.

I read this again. It looks OK. If you topped up the 2 years that HMRC said were missing, then you are on track for the minimum (full pension) qualifying 35 years at 67? So, presently your years show as 33 (full), as that is what you actually have right now, but it should change to 34 soon. The forecast assumes that these final two years' contributions will be paid in full and so predicts the full pension amount for you when you become sixty whatever it is?

Well they do make errors sometimes. Maybe in your favour? But, if in doubt, give them a call.

Ah well, we can't be sad any more now it appears we have some new options: Thumbs down ticks most -ve boxes. Heart-broken? Super sad?

You don't really seem to know how to say much of anything really. As in, you seem to be surplus to requirements.

What a sad response.

You're so hard on those Bidens.

It's your chart. Why not explain it?

Should we pro rate 2025 up to 4%?

As per usual, most here are ignoring the debt problem. Trump mentioned the huge debt and said he wanted a lower dollar and USD interest rates before the election. The intent is to at least cut the interest payments on that debt, which are well over 1T/year now. He is seeing the dollar go down but bond yields actually increased last time the Fed fund rates were cut - that is not supposed to happen and the recent bond auction flopped - a huge and difficult problem and there is little confidence in the USD currency and dollar treasuries already. The Fed is losing control. The can may be kicked down the road (again) for a while with further "QE" but that will just make the end game even more painful.

I use the sad emoji frequently. This is because other more suitable options are not offered. If I've already commented on a topic but then see the same old gash popping up being repeated endlessly, then I feel so sad. Most of the emojis offered here identify positive responses but I always feel there is a poor selection of more less approving types, e.g bs, moronic and bored.

Clinton managed a small surplus late in his term but the debt still increased every year.

Good news for the consumer. Bad news for the protester. Scrambled or fried?

💡

There is nothing "normal" about this mess.

The flood was in December - not summer.

What is Vital Factor? Some new shampoo?

You gave no proof either. Trump $7.8 trillion, with at least half of that a direct extra cost due to Covid. Biden $8.5trillion. Not 6T.