Jump to content

Police officer ‘commits suicide’ while at dinner with colleagues


webfact

Recommended Posts

Police officer ‘commits suicide’ while at dinner with colleagues

By The Nation

 

beac8d24cc612d3dcc6808d3cf1242af.jpg

 

A policeman allegedly committed suicide by shooting himself dead in a restaurant toilet in Si Sa Ket’s Uthumphon Phisai district on Wednesday night.

 

Following the suicide report at 10 minutes past midnight, police found the body of Pol Senior Sgt-Major Narongsal Chalermsri, 52, who served as the Uthumphon Phisai precinct’s financial clerk, inside a restaurant toilet.

 

The body – with one gunshot wound to the chest and another to the right temple – was found in a pool of blood while a pistol was found nearby.

 

A police investigation concluded that Narongsak had come to the restaurant with precinct inspector Pol Major Chusak Chanthamala and four other officers for a meal when Narongsak excused himself to go to the toilet.

 

A few minutes later a gunshot was heard and Chusak asked a subordinate to check at the toilet. Then another gunshot was heard, prompting the officers and other people in the restaurant to break down the toilet door.

 

Police said they suspected that Narongsak might have been suffering from stress related to personal issues, which drove him to commit suicide. 

 

There was no explanation of a scenario involving two bullet wounds.

 

Police also interviewed the officers at the scene and checked their hands for gunpowder residue in front of public bystanders.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/breakingnews/30329127

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-10-12
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A troll post with an unproven comment has been removed.

 

9) You will not post inflammatory messages on the forum, or attempt to disrupt discussions to upset its participants, or trolling. Trolling can be defined as the act of purposefully antagonizing other people on the internet by posting controversial, inflammatory, irrelevant or off-topic messages with the primary intent of provoking other users into an emotional response or to generally disrupt normal on-topic discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, webfact said:

Police said they suspected that Narongsak might have been suffering from stress related to personal issues, which drove him to commit suicide.

 

I find it truly amazing the police here always jump to conclusions as to why a suicide or murder happens without even bothering to investigate first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TVGerry said:

I find it truly amazing the police here always jump to conclusions as to why a suicide or murder happens without even bothering to investigate first.

 

It comes down from the top.

 

For example the Prime Minister of the country declaring that 2 Burmese are guilty before any trial has even begun. 

 

:coffee1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Happy Grumpy said:

 

It comes down from the top.

 

For example the Prime Minister of the country declaring that 2 Burmese are guilty before any trial has even begun. 

 

:coffee1:

That's because no Thai would do such a thing...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, webfact said:

The body – with one gunshot wound to the chest and another to the right temple – was found in a pool of blood while a pistol was found nearby.

This part I find a bit odd. But I guess it's possible he first shot himself in the chest and realized this is going to be too slow, and then the right temple to finish it off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"allegedly committed suicide...one gunshot wound to the chest and another to the right temple..."

 

The only things missing to make this an open and shut case for suicide are 3 bullet wounds in the back.

Edited by jaltsc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know people always start criticizing arm chair detectives, arm chair CSI or whatever the latest 'buzz phrase' is posted by a handful of smart-asses who fail to understand that this forum is one for discussion.... but, regardless, here is my take... 

 

How on earth is the primary conclusion as to the case of death of someone with such injures suicide ?

 

Is this pure and absolute laziness ? Is it a purse and total absence of 'give a flook' ? Is it instructions from above to play down an incident regardless of the blatant and glaringly obvious facts indicating otherwise?

 

Surely it is far better to just state facts - Bullet wounds to the chest and temple, gun found nearby. Investigation ongoing.... Why would the spokesman have to make such a farcical comment as to suggest suicide?... its plainly idiotic and such commonplace now that we've become so used to the BiB pulling the wool over their own eyes in believing we (the public) may actually buy any of this, or they simply do not care whether we buy it at all... 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Christ, that was one tough Somchai. Blasts 'imself in the chest then one in the head for good measure. The Japanese seppuku crowd would be proud I think. The poor guy must have been very depressed and stressed out. He is in a better place now.

Edited by Essecola
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Suicide possibly?

 

As they are basically an outlaw gang what sort of people do they mix with?

 

Excessive demands on other crooks for a piece of the action resulting in retaliation?

 

Jealousies and friction from their colleagues, enraged husband or father of a Mia Noi?

 

Wife or family members suspecting him holding out on them financially.

 

No doubt the jungle they live in is a dangerous place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:

I know people always start criticizing arm chair detectives, arm chair CSI or whatever the latest 'buzz phrase' is posted by a handful of smart-asses who fail to understand that this forum is one for discussion.... but, regardless, here is my take... 

 

How on earth is the primary conclusion as to the case of death of someone with such injures suicide ?

 

Is this pure and absolute laziness ? Is it a purse and total absence of 'give a flook' ? Is it instructions from above to play down an incident regardless of the blatant and glaringly obvious facts indicating otherwise?

 

Surely it is far better to just state facts - Bullet wounds to the chest and temple, gun found nearby. Investigation ongoing.... Why would the spokesman have to make such a farcical comment as to suggest suicide?... its plainly idiotic and such commonplace now that we've become so used to the BiB pulling the wool over their own eyes in believing we (the public) may actually buy any of this, or they simply do not care whether we buy it at all... 

 

 

You have failed to grasp how the Thai police work. You have overlaid the fundamental principles of Western policing on a very Thai situation. The result is you are left confused.

 

The Thai police use a different method for resolving cases. It is outcome-led. The most desirable outcome is first decided upon. The criteria for deciding this is related to the relative social status of the various stakeholders in the case. Then evidence which supports the 'most desirable outcome' is accentuated whilst evidence which doesn't is discarded or even altered or hidden.

 

The goal of this style of policing is to preserve hierarchical power structures within society and to allow those with higher status greater protection.

 

Once you have grasped all this, your confusion will be no more. You might also think about ways to boost your own social status within Thai society so you too can enjoy greater protection from prosecution or even others with social status who might do you harm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Briggsy said:

You have failed to grasp how the Thai police work. You have overlaid the fundamental principles of Western policing on a very Thai situation. The result is you are left confused.

 

The Thai police use a different method for resolving cases. It is outcome-led. The most desirable outcome is first decided upon. The criteria for deciding this is related to the relative social status of the various stakeholders in the case. Then evidence which supports the 'most desirable outcome' is accentuated whilst evidence which doesn't is discarded or even altered or hidden.

 

The goal of this style of policing is to preserve hierarchical power structures within society and to allow those with higher status greater protection.

 

Once you have grasped all this, your confusion will be no more. You might also think about ways to boost your own social status within Thai society so you too can enjoy greater protection from prosecution or even others with social status who might do you harm.

 

I understand your saying in a very clever way, they are a bunch of crooks protecting other crooks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Oziex1 said:

 

I understand your saying in a very clever way, they are a bunch of crooks protecting other crooks!

Thank you.

 

Yes, mostly, but it could be the 'most desirable outcome' actually means arresting a 19-year-old drug addict who had burgled the house of a mid-ranking civil servant. So, they are not always protecting crooks, they protect those who have social status (political power/wealth/connection to government/senior rank, etc.)

 

In my example above, they actually do their job (by chance).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, YetAnother said:

huh ? shoot yourself in the chest and then in the temple ?! whomever could believe that ?

 

That's not it. He shot himself in the chest, then in the temple. And then he threw his gun away.

 

Sounds no worse than most sick buffalo stories to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Briggsy said:

You have failed to grasp how the Thai police work. You have overlaid the fundamental principles of Western policing on a very Thai situation. The result is you are left confused.

 

The Thai police use a different method for resolving cases. It is outcome-led. The most desirable outcome is first decided upon. The criteria for deciding this is related to the relative social status of the various stakeholders in the case. Then evidence which supports the 'most desirable outcome' is accentuated whilst evidence which doesn't is discarded or even altered or hidden.

 

The goal of this style of policing is to preserve hierarchical power structures within society and to allow those with higher status greater protection.

 

Once you have grasped all this, your confusion will be no more. You might also think about ways to boost your own social status within Thai society so you too can enjoy greater protection from prosecution or even others with social status who might do you harm.

Or you could realize that you're just another target and buy a plane ticket.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, richard_smith237 said:

I know people always start criticizing arm chair detectives, arm chair CSI or whatever the latest 'buzz phrase' is posted by a handful of smart-asses who fail to understand that this forum is one for discussion.... but, regardless, here is my take... 

 

How on earth is the primary conclusion as to the case of death of someone with such injures suicide ?

 

Is this pure and absolute laziness ? Is it a purse and total absence of 'give a flook' ? Is it instructions from above to play down an incident regardless of the blatant and glaringly obvious facts indicating otherwise?

 

Surely it is far better to just state facts - Bullet wounds to the chest and temple, gun found nearby. Investigation ongoing.... Why would the spokesman have to make such a farcical comment as to suggest suicide?... its plainly idiotic and such commonplace now that we've become so used to the BiB pulling the wool over their own eyes in believing we (the public) may actually buy any of this, or they simply do not care whether we buy it at all... 

 

 

I don't think many people want to articulate a book-sized response to a never-ending problem. Much easier, and funnier to be a smart ass. The message is the same. :smile:

 

They don't care if we buy it, as long as the money keeps flowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The chest is a large area, the heart is a small organ within it. If he did indeed pull the trigger himself and cocked up the first round or faltered at the last second its perfectly logical that he fired a second shot. A lot depends on the calibre of the weapon used as well. The fact he was involved with station finances has alarm bells bigger than Big Ben on a Big day ringing though.

 

Sorry to spoil the tinfoil hat brigade's day- mind you we're only on page 2! :sorry:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TVGerry said:

 

I find it truly amazing the police here always jump to conclusions as to why a suicide or murder happens without even bothering to investigate first.

Police "suspect", ie first opinion. No conclusion. Read again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Briggsy said:

You have failed to grasp how the Thai police work. You have overlaid the fundamental principles of Western policing on a very Thai situation. The result is you are left confused.

 

The Thai police use a different method for resolving cases. It is outcome-led. The most desirable outcome is first decided upon. The criteria for deciding this is related to the relative social status of the various stakeholders in the case. Then evidence which supports the 'most desirable outcome' is accentuated whilst evidence which doesn't is discarded or even altered or hidden.

 

The goal of this style of policing is to preserve hierarchical power structures within society and to allow those with higher status greater protection.

 

Once you have grasped all this, your confusion will be no more. You might also think about ways to boost your own social status within Thai society so you too can enjoy greater protection from prosecution or even others with social status who might do you harm.

Nice try but crap. Hierarchical integrity? Higher Status get protection? Read again the year's headlines. Generals jailed. Royal decorations stripped. Corrupt politicians jailed. Come back in a few years and try again. Your confusion will fade like morning mist, etc. 

Edited by jgarbo
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...