Jump to content

Trump says Texas shooting due to 'mental health problem,' not a gun issue


Recommended Posts

Posted

Trump says Texas shooting due to 'mental health problem,' not a gun issue

 

tag_reuters.jpg

U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a news conference with Japan's Prime Minister Shinzo Abe at Akasaka Palace in Tokyo, Japan, November 6, 2017. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

 

TOKYO (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump on Monday called the mass shooting in Texas that left at least 26 people dead a "mental health problem," not "a gun situation."

 

Asked what policies he might support in response to the shooting at a press conference in Tokyo, Trump said that based on preliminary reports, the gunman was "a very deranged individual, a lot of problems".

 

He said Sunday's attack "isn't a guns situation" but "a mental health problem at the highest level. It's a very, very sad event".The lone gunman carrying an assault rifle opened fire after entering First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, about 65 km (40 miles) east of San Antonio, killing people that ranged in age from 5 to 72.

 

(Reporting by Malcolm Foster; Editing by Nick Macfie)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2017-11-06
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, darksidedog said:

If the guy had mental health problems, why then was he still allowed to purchase guns?

You do not make money from refusing a sale...

Edited by Basil B
  • Like 2
  • Sad 2
Posted

Logic like this is an insult to victims of guns. The mentally ill have no business buying guns. We have seen where that leades.

  • Like 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, zaphod reborn said:

He was court-martialled and dishonorably discharged from the USAF for domestic violence.  Under the gun control laws, he was prohibited from purchasing firearms.  Apparently, someone fudged his background check.  Trump blames mental health, and that was a factor, but investigating how this shooter got around the background check is what needs to be done, so those regs are better enforced.  https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2017/nov/06/devin-kelley-named-as-texas-church-shooting-suspect-was-court-martialed-by-us-air-force

He received a "bad conduct" discharge for assaulting his wife n kids, NOT a dishonorable discharge. He was still allowed to buy gun(s).

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, mikebike said:

He received a "bad conduct" discharge for assaulting his wife n kids, NOT a dishonorable discharge. He was still allowed to buy gun(s).

Nope, he could not legally buy guns, as reported by several news agencies.  The discharge was due to a violent crime which prohibits him from buying firearms.  A BCD only preserves vested pension rights, but grants no other benefits withheld by a dishonorable discharge.  Brady Act NICS disqualifier:

"Domestic Violence

  • The potential buyer is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner;
  • Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence."

 

http://graphics.wsj.com/gun-check-explainer/

Edited by zaphod reborn
  • Like 1
Posted

Someone has a mental health issue for sure!

May not be the shooter, though!

 

But let me get this straight:

IF we are witnessing a rare occasion of Trump, telling the truth and the guy HAD a mental health issue...how the #$@% did he get a gun?

He was also reported to have a documented history of violence- again: how the #$@% did he get a gun?

 

Guns don't kill people...people with mental issues and guns kill people!

  • Like 1
Posted

Another shooting and no good guys with guns around, shocking. This is getting to be a broken record.

Maybe reducing guns in US society is the way forward, unless NRA members can stop talking the talk and actually walk the walk.

Posted
57 minutes ago, zaphod reborn said:

Nope, he could not legally buy guns, as reported by several news agencies.  The discharge was due to a violent crime which prohibits him from buying firearms.  A BCD only preserves vested pension rights, but grants no other benefits withheld by a dishonorable discharge.  Brady Act NICS disqualifier:

"Domestic Violence

  • The potential buyer is subject to a court order that restrains the person from harassing, stalking or threatening an intimate partner or child of such intimate partner;
  • Has been convicted in any court of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence."

 

http://graphics.wsj.com/gun-check-explainer/

There's some confusion in initial reporting whether it was a DD or a BCD, but that is irrelevant under 18 USC 922(g) question #6.

(6) a person who has been discharged from the Armed Forces under dishonorable conditions;

 

He was convicted of V.UCMJ Article 128 x 2.  Assault.   It was reportedly domestic violence against his then wife and daughter.   Problem is military system doesn't have a specific violation/crime code for domestic violence assault like many States have enacted in recent decades.  128 is non-specific.  The other problem is, the military system doesn't use crime categories of Infraction, Misdemeanor and Felony like the civilian system does.  You would have to query deeper to find out the details of the case, and to determine equivalent crime category, find out what his confinement sentence was.  In this case, he was apparently awarded 1 year in the brig, which is right at the top of Misdemeanor category.    If the Domestic Violence classification had been crystal clear in the NICS system during the gun seller's background check, he would have been disqualified again under 922(g), question #9.

(9) a person who has been convicted of a misdemeanor crime of domestic violence.

 

So he either lied on the background check, or he slipped through the cracks caused by vagaries between military and civilian language and terminology.   Or both. 

Posted
3 hours ago, mikebike said:

<deleted>... Why do these idiots think we cannot see a false dichotomy?

 

There is a gun problem AND a mental health problem.

 

Neither of these will be solved or even contemplated by the current admin.

Pardon me for bringing this up....

In my country the gun laws are very,very restrictive, private ownership is only possible under strict rule, and then only for sports hooting and hunting.

Even so, this year, many people were killed, using guns and other means.

The guns used in those killings were all illegal!

The police has not the means to control illegal ownership and use of guns, not at all.

Nowhere in the world.

Gun laws can only work if there is a means to not only control legal owned guns.

If some nutcase goes on skilling spree using guns, the problem is not the guns but the nutcase.

Something must be done about the right people owning guns while excluding existing or new nutcases.

Which of course might also do something about illegal use of guns.

That said, how many people are killed in traffic on a daily basis?

I think very many more per day as we now see in these awful incidents.

When are we going to do something about these deaths?

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
2 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said:

I'm inclined to believe the Fake President...

 

After all, who's a greater expert on "mental problems" and being "deranged" than our Fake President... :whistling:

The former president?

The intended democratic candidate?

Or face it, most politico's?

  • Confused 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, hansnl said:

Pardon me for bringing this up....

In my country the gun laws are very,very restrictive, private ownership is only possible under strict rule, and then only for sports hooting and hunting.

Even so, this year, many people were killed, using guns and other means.

The guns used in those killings were all illegal!

The police has not the means to control illegal ownership and use of guns, not at all.

Nowhere in the world.

Gun laws can only work if there is a means to not only control legal owned guns.

If some nutcase goes on skilling spree using guns, the problem is not the guns but the nutcase.

Something must be done about the right people owning guns while excluding existing or new nutcases.

Which of course might also do something about illegal use of guns.

That said, how many people are killed in traffic on a daily basis?

I think very many more per day as we now see in these awful incidents.

When are we going to do something about these deaths?

How many got killed where?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...