Jump to content

Prayut coy about taking on Defence Minister role


webfact

Recommended Posts

Prayut coy about taking on Defence Minister role

By The Nation

 

c3fd5214d25b88c25f6ed425bb9415f9.jpeg

 

Prime Minister General Prayut Chan-o-cha urged media on Friday morning to "wait and see" whether he would also appoint himself Defence Minister in the upcoming fourth Cabinet shuffle of his government.


Local media reported on Friday that in the upcoming reshuffle Prayut would take over the Defence Minister post, while allowing current Defence Minister General Prawit Wongsuwan to remain his Deputy Prime Minister.

 

There has been a trend toward PMs concurrently occupying the Defence lead, including the last prime minister, Yingluck Shinawatra. Other concurrent holders were: General Chatichai Choonhavan General Suchinda Kraprayoon, Chuan Leekpai, General Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, Samak Sundaravej, and Somchai Wongsawat.

 

Asked if he had submitted his proposed new Cabinet lineup list for royal endorsement, Prayut said, “I'm doing”.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30331843

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2017-11-17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, tracker1 said:

Wearing so many hats one has to be very talented !

As can be gleaned from the list of esteemed previous PMs who also served as Defense Ministers: Yingluck Shinawatra, General Chatichai Choonhavan General Suchinda Kraprayoon, Chuan Leekpai, General Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, Samak Sundaravej, and Somchai Wongsawat. 

Edited by zaphod reborn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, webfact said:

Prayut coy

Coyness is not known as one of Prayut's qualities. But I feel the rumour may be true that he will replace Prawit with himself as Defence Minister.

Prawit has made a series of stuff-ups within his portfolio recently and caused some embarrassment to the PM. Anyone who does that can expect retribution. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, zaphod reborn said:

As can be gleaned from the list of esteemed previous PMs who also served as Defense Ministers: Yingluck Shinawatra, General Chatichai Choonhavan General Suchinda Kraprayoon, Chuan Leekpai, General Chavalit Yongchaiyudh, Samak Sundaravej, and Somchai Wongsawat. 

Most of them actually obtained a valid mandate via the Thai electorate. Prayuth was elected PM by the NLA, all of the members of that body were appointed by Prayuth himself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, webfact said:

Local media reported on Friday that in the upcoming reshuffle Prayut would take over the Defence Minister post, while allowing current Defence Minister General Prawit Wongsuwan to remain his Deputy Prime Minister.

It hardly seems worth one's time.  The only defense needed in Thailand, other than the constant fabrication of hot air by the public sector, is against flood and drought.  They need a flood / drought specialist not a military man.  It should be a civil defense post. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sjaak327 said:

Most of them actually obtained a valid mandate via the Thai electorate. Prayuth was elected PM by the NLA, all of the members of that body were appointed by Prayuth himself.

Having a "valid mandate" (which I find meaningless in parliamentary political systems) doesn't make these leaders talented or even competent, as can be gleaned from the last PM elevated by the parliamentary system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zaphod reborn said:

Having a "valid mandate" (which I find meaningless in parliamentary political systems) doesn't make these leaders talented or even competent, as can be gleaned from the last PM elevated by the parliamentary system.

 

No no. Mr. Mugabe and Mr. Hun Sen have valid mandates. And look how talented they are.

 

Ms. Yingluck handpicked herself to be Defense Minister, just as she handpicked herself to chair the rice scheme.

 

Yeah for elections!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

No no. Mr. Mugabe and Mr. Hun Sen have valid mandates. And look how talented they are.

 

Ms. Yingluck handpicked herself to be Defense Minister, just as she handpicked herself to chair the rice scheme.

 

Yeah for elections!

You pick the very worst examples of faux democracies and use that as an argument against holding elections?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't wait to see this guy smashed in the election.......the tantrum will be epic.

 

Even more enjoyable will be once he is removed from power and the people are once again free to voice their opinions Prayuth is going to be hearing a lot more than answers to his silly questions.

 

Only voluntary exile awaits.

 

:clap2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just could not stop laughing on looking at the picture posted !!....observe the two bodyguards at the back chucklin' mainly the chap on the left :cheesy:....Oh dear !!!...if the boss see's the pic, the poor chaps will end up diverting trafic on Sukhumvit !!

And naturally ...:sorry:

Edited by observer90210
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Becker said:
3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

No no. Mr. Mugabe and Mr. Hun Sen have valid mandates. And look how talented they are.

 

Ms. Yingluck handpicked herself to be Defense Minister, just as she handpicked herself to chair the rice scheme.

 

Yeah for elections!

You pick the very worst examples of faux democracies and use that as an argument against holding elections?

If you want "an argument against holding elections", look no further than the electoral history of Thailand since it became a constitutional monarchy in 1932. Elections are worthless in Thailand. They cause more trouble than anything else as they always make military coups necessary. No elections = no military coups. They'll be in this coup/election cycle for decades and possibly centuries to come. Maybe Prayut will break the cycle and make elections totally unnecessary. He's been doing quite well so far. 3 and a half years and counting...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, tropo said:

If you want "an argument against holding elections", look no further than the electoral history of Thailand since it became a constitutional monarchy in 1932. Elections are worthless in Thailand. They cause more trouble than anything else as they always make military coups necessary. No elections = no military coups. They'll be in this coup/election cycle for decades and possibly centuries to come. Maybe Prayut will break the cycle and make elections totally unnecessary. He's been doing quite well so far. 3 and a half years and counting...

The coups are only necessary because they elites who orchestrate them deem that to be the case. They can't bear demands for equality or giving up their exclusive rights to the whole pie. That is why they got Suthep to instigate demonstrations (something has freely admitted to) and installed Prayuth.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, stephen tracy said:

The coups are only necessary because they elites who orchestrate them deem that to be the case. They can't bear demands for equality or giving up their exclusive rights to the whole pie. That is why they got Suthep to instigate demonstrations (something has freely admitted to) and installed Prayuth.

The comment was made tongue-in-cheek. Coups undermine any attempt at democracy and are never necessary.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...