Jump to content

Thailand suggests slower bullet train amid high cost estimate


webfact

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Dave67 said:

Can someone remind me I Recall High speed bullshit express Line 1 was China to Lam Chabang,  Is this one part of High speed bullshit express line 2 or 3 ?

I think it depends on whether there's an 'R' in the month.

Give it another few months, we could be up to 5 or 6...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 134
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

If they just use the good old Thai diesel trains there will be significant cost savings.....Which then can be used to purchase a few submarines, surveillance balloons or even a rocket to send the first Thai astronaut into orbit!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, mok199 said:

that's fair enough...I personally think Thailand was getting in over their head at those speeds...200 sound fine

I believed that the 180 speed will accommodate the cargo aspect of the business. Makes better business sense. That will meant a reversal to the original previous government infrastructure strategy.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On a practical note, without any sign of a slur, might the government consider the fact that the difference in maximum speed between the existing line of 120 km/h and the projected maximum speed of the new to build line of, say, 190 km/h is not worth the investment.

It might be better to forget building new lines and spend the money on upgrading the existing lines for higher speeds and buying pendolino rolling stock suitable for, say, 200 km/h?

Yes, even on 1 metre gauge!

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, shady86 said:

Looking at the culture here of procuring things as cheap as possible, I'm pretty sure they will run out of budget to maintain the rails and trains so everything will end up being abandoned.

Buying as cheap as possible is normal practice everywhere in the world.

Cost overruns are also normal all over the world because of this practice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, AlQaholic said:

If they just use the good old Thai diesel trains there will be significant cost savings.....Which then can be used to purchase a few submarines, surveillance balloons or even a rocket to send the first Thai astronaut into orbit!

 

You're way behind, on that last suggestion  ...

 

http://www.nationmultimedia.com/national/Phirada-poised-to-become-first-Thai-to-go-into-out-30226264.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Laughing Gravy said:

It defeats the point really having a fast train service go slower. Then again it is pointless having a BTS system that has so few carriages that there are so big queues, that using public transport to reduce road traffic congestion, is worthless. Must be another 'Thainess' concept I haven't got my head round, even after 17 years living here full time.

Yes, I had the same thoughts when I read about it in the news a little while back, about the slower 'fast train' that is. I wondered at that time what else might be cut and so make it a pointless issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, chickenslegs said:

 

I have a mental image of the next government visiting the Treasury and finding it stacked with cash around the outside, but hollow and empty in the centre - something like those rice warehouses of a few years ago.

I'll tell you what's mental. Your allusion to there being a "next" government. That's what's mental.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, shady86 said:

Looking at the culture here of procuring things as cheap as possible, I'm pretty sure they will run out of budget to maintain the rails and trains so everything will end up being abandoned.

 

Not sure about that.

There have been more than a few incidences of paying way over the top for stuff, such as bomb detectors, airport scanning systems, millitary hardware.

 

The reason why the funds dry up is because they get syphoned into too many pockets along the way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, webfact said:

Prime Minister Prayuth Chan-ocha, who leads the country's junta, instructed transport officials to consider reducing the top speed from 300kph to between 180kph and 200kph.

So just a little slower than the double decker bus convoys

 

Edited by canuckamuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, hansnl said:

On a practical note, without any sign of a slur, might the government consider the fact that the difference in maximum speed between the existing line of 120 km/h and the projected maximum speed of the new to build line of, say, 190 km/h is not worth the investment.

It might be better to forget building new lines and spend the money on upgrading the existing lines for higher speeds and buying pendolino rolling stock suitable for, say, 200 km/h?

Yes, even on 1 metre gauge!

 

 

 

Can you think of another country in the world that runs  trains at 200 KmPH  on metre gauge ? I can't

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Dave67 said:

 

The speed doesn't really make much difference to the price most tracks even metros have tolerances similar to high speed.Still the same viaducts, tunnels and land formation. Unless they are going for wooden sleeper and ballast,. But then again it was all probably bullshit from the start

Maybe, but not on metre gauge

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, lincolnshire poacher said:

Quite true, Thailand accepts a lot of old  Japanese rollig stock at the moment

 

Here's some previously rolled stock.

 

Not sure where it's from originally but it didn't get to where it was going.

 

ttrain4.jpg.5a39e2d25c3475d226ebabbda99628f8.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cadbury said:

The speed of the train was never going to be 300kph as claimed in this story. It was always intended to be 250kph so a drop of around 50kph is not so big deal. Poor reporting.

So here they are debating how fast it will go and how much will they spend only weeks before they promised construction would begin next month. Typical military style bungling governance.

So can it be expected the same will apply to the Chinese fast train line through to Nong Khai? Presumably the budgets for both have been revised downward because of other financial pressures. 

IMHO the chances of these high speed trains ever happening is almost nil. This military junta seems to have trouble making even the most simplest things happen including holding an election and clearing footpaths.

Procurring Chinese submarines appears to be going ahead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, transam said:

5a6041801ca91_mallard-steam-locomotive-rails-161329.thumb.jpg.b72691d5cba7666441452184c014e3a7.jpg

I'm not sure everyone fully appreciated the applicability of this suggestion. The LNER 4468 set the all-time steam speed record at 203kph, which would land it nicely in the middle of the new suggested 180-220kph target range.

 

And of course steam is much more environmentally friendly than diesel, right?

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LNER_4468_Mallard

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...