toughlove Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Who’s losing? Who did I call a racist?You said you see bigotry "If a person is intolerant of other ideas, races, or religions, we call that person a bigot" You didn't know the meaning? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Just now, bizboi said: The immigration Police because they felt it necessary to drag a few people in to question them Biggot = racist doesn’t it? Have you taken a walk to the metro in Sukhumvit lately I bet you cant walk from one end to another without being propositioned by “men of colour” sad but true Sad, yes but not in the sense you say and definitely not true. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, bannork said: Bluespunk please watch this when you have the time I doubt I’ll have time to watch that. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, toughlove said: You said you see bigotry "If a person is intolerant of other ideas, races, or religions, we call that person a bigot" Yes, but I never called anyone a racist. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rott Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 8 minutes ago, Bluespunk said: I don’t see sense, just prejudice and bigotry. In South Africa "Coloureds" are an ethnic group, one of four :- white/black/coloured/asian. Try telling a coloured that he/she is not coloured but black and you will very soon wish you hadn't. Coloured is what they are and what they are proud of being. You are as prissy in your ignorance as the git in the pub. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post bizboi Posted January 20, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said: Nothing there justifies racial profiling. No idea what goes on in a student bar, I don’t drink. Why do you mention it? 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, bizboi said: Ha ha ha, ah, gotta pity the alt right. To paraphrase: Forgive them, for they know what they do. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rott Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bluespunk said: Nothing there justifies racial profiling. No idea what goes on in a student bar, I don’t drink. Why do you mention it? Because that is where your opinions appear to have come from. Perhaps "an Islington coffee klatsch" or SWP meeting might be more appropriate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bannork Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 minutes ago, Bluespunk said: I doubt I’ll have time to watch that. You should find the time. It's narrated by a former head of The Commission for Racial Equality, in the UK, Trevor Phillips. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevor_Phillips 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, rott said: Because that is where your opinions appear to have come from. Perhaps "an Islington coffee klatsch" or SWP meeting might be more appropriate. Wrong on all counts. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 3 minutes ago, bannork said: You should find the time. It's narrated by a former head of The Commission for Racial Equality, in the UK, Trevor Phillips. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trevor_Phillips It still won’t bring me to believe the racial profiling actions of the bib in this case were based in anything but prejudice and bigotry. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cyberfarang Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Actually the gentlemen over stayers in the photo are only a couple of shades darker than the proud looking Thai police who arrested them. So they`re all coloured. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, ChouDoufu said: i suppose if you repeat it enough it will become true. No, it’s true in itself. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChrisY1 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 35 minutes ago, bizboi said: so 20% were guilty and the rest were freed after being checked…all tarred with the same brush maybe? If Britain and other European countries did this they wouldn’t have 250,000illegal immigrants!! We'll pass the pun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oldlakey Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 26 minutes ago, rott said: No in these circumstances it is common sense. Black/coloured? I was once having a conversation in a London pub with a US gent, briefly mentioning South Africa I used the word coloureds. He was mightily offended until I was patient enough to educate him. Thick git. Basil D'Oliveria he was a cape coloured as they were called, a good cricketer, a fine upstanding chap in the face of adversity and the actions of the Tossers at the MCC 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
USPatriot Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Were the colors the same or all different. Were they Red, blue, green, orange, pink, silver, copper or gold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altcar bob Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 If it acts as a duck, walks like duck talks like a duck.. it's a duck (black one too) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janclaes47 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 6 hours ago, Bluespunk said: “He said 30 racial minority men and women were taken for questioning” That is detaining them. please explain how I made the implications you accuse me of making. I have from the start made clear that policing should be based on evidence, not bigotry and prejudice. From the OP " the operation that police sought criminals involved in romance scams and drugs trafficking. " Now how many non racial minorities do you know are involved in romance scams ? FYI when US police investigate KK Clan I doubt they target black people in their raids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 4 minutes ago, janclaes47 said: From the OP " the operation that police sought criminals involved in romance scams and drugs trafficking. " Now how many non racial minorities do you know are involved in romance scams ? FYI when US police investigate KK Clan I doubt they target black people in their raids. Investigate and arrest based on evidence by all means. Stop, detain and question based on colour...no. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janclaes47 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 (edited) Just now, Bluespunk said: Investigate and arrest based on evidence by all means. Stop, detain and question based on colour...no. Why you didn't answer my question? How many white people are involved in romance scams that you are aware of? Edited January 20, 2018 by janclaes47 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, janclaes47 said: Why you didn't answer my question? How many white people are involved in romance scams that you are aware of? That's not the point I have been making. I'm all for the bib investigating romance scams, they can hurt people. What I am arguing is that stopping, detaining and questioning people on the basis of racial profiling is prejudicial. And as a strategy for breaking up romance scams, nonsensical. To answer your question a proper investigation would have to take place, that is not what this was. They stopped people because of their colour. Only 6 were arrested...none for romance scams...now, what does that tell us? Edited January 20, 2018 by Bluespunk 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jenny2017 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 The joint operation by tourist police, 191 patrol and special operations police, immigration police and narcotics suppression police was led by Pol Maj-General Surachet Hakpal, deputy commissioner of the Tourist Police Bureau. Joint? Druggies? And I thought the article was about dark skinned people who can't afford skin whitener. My fault, sorry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
janclaes47 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Just now, Bluespunk said: That's not the point I have been making. I'm all for the bib investigating romance scams, they can hurt people. What I am arguing is that stopping, detaining and questioning people on the basis of racial profiling is prejudicial. To answer your question a proper investigation would have to take place, that is not what this was. They stopped people because of their colour. Only 6 were arrested...none for romance scams...now, what does that tell us? If no white people are involved in romance scams, the why would police target white people in an operation, that is intended to find suspects involved in romance scams? You are just creating an argument for the sake of having an argument or to increase your post count. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
altcar bob Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Just now, Bluespunk said: Only 6 were arrested...none for romance scams...now, what does that tell us? given another week ,the lot would have been arrested Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bluespunk Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 (edited) 4 minutes ago, altcar bob said: given another week ,the lot would have been arrested Oh my, bob, lowering yourself to talk to me? I thought, when you were unable to come up with a coherent argument, you said I was an idiot,. I'm shocked you would disgrace your high intellect by bringing yourself down to my level... I've checked and yes, it was post 131 [at least I thought that was your sentiment, the rest of the post being somewhat lacking in coherence] Edited January 20, 2018 by Bluespunk 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieqw Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Coloured coloured you can’t say that in 2018 what is going on here Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cookieqw Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 7 hours ago, Monomial said: Black is a color in absorbtive color spaces. Black is the absence of color in emmissive color spaces. So, as a technical point, you need to define your question. To which specific color space are you referring when you ask this? And the world you live in is ? Which colour space ? , to use English Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rimmer Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 Multiple baiting, bickering flaming posts and replies have been removed, also some off topic vids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coulson Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 7 hours ago, Just Weird said: Black. Black is not a colour Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AGareth2 Posted January 20, 2018 Share Posted January 20, 2018 2 hours ago, Bluespunk said: Racial profiling is bigotry. It is rooted in hate and prejudice. welcome to Thailand have you just come off the boat? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now