Jump to content

Brexit has created chaos in Britain – nobody voted for this


webfact

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, transam said:

Looks like one reason many are bailing out of the UK is that employers of naughty folk are being fined 20,000 quid for EACH naughty person, so finding work maybe a ploblem....

A really good step...:stoner:

But this does not apply to EU citizen as they all have a right to work in the UK, it's only relevant to non-EU migrants.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, tebee said:

But this does not apply to EU citizen as they all have a right to work in the UK, it's only relevant to non-EU migrants.

But it is reckoned there are 1,000,000 naughty folk earning dosh in the UK..Low-life from the EU are now in the UK doing their low-life stuff...More strain on the country dealing with them..Police, court and prison costs...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Grouse said:

I have seen no evidence of American involvement with Focke Wulf or the V1 pilotless aircraft/"doodlebug" or V2 ballistic missile. However IBM was heavily involved in the Final Solution. 

 

https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2001/04/hitlers-willing-business-partners/303146/

 

But this is entirely off topic please stop the discussion on this Brexit thread.

 

 

Ok, I'll make this the last on this.

 

 

The US company ITT bought C. Lorenz AG  in 1930, who owned a 25% share in Focke Wulf and also perfected the flying bomb.  In the 60's, ITT won $27 million in damages due to the Focke Wulf factory being bombed by the allies.  ITT also owned shares in the company that made radar equipment that helped the Nazi's locate and destroy allied submarines.

 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, transam said:

But it is reckoned there are 1,000,000 naughty folk earning dosh in the UK..Low-life from the EU are now in the UK doing their low-life stuff...More strain on the country dealing with them..Police, court and prison costs...

That will get your Snowflakes to melting point. the truth allways does for some reason.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since this marathon of 409 pages was started by a Guardian opinion piece. That media outlet that is a solid supporter of Brexit abd totally non partisan.

 

It seems appropriate to bring to the table an up to date Guardian opinion piece.

 

Quote

Who now can doubt that Jeremy Corbyn wants a hard Brexit?

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/14/jeremy-corbyn-wants-hard-brexit-labour

 

Jeremy Corbyn voted no in 1975 and he voted no in every single parliamentary vote on EU Treaties ever since.

 

Nice to see that you are finally getting the message that Labour are not the saviours that are going to stop Brexit.

 

Back to article after article about Blair & Mandelson.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, transam said:

But it is reckoned there are 1,000,000 naughty folk earning dosh in the UK..Low-life from the EU are now in the UK doing their low-life stuff...More strain on the country dealing with them..Police, court and prison costs...

But my young Trans,  my point is the 20k fines only apply to employing people with no right to work in the UK. So no one is ever going to be fined for employing an EU citizen.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

 

 

Ok, I'll make this the last on this.

 

 

The US company ITT bought C. Lorenz AG  in 1930, who owned a 25% share in Focke Wulf and also perfected the flying bomb.  In the 60's, ITT won $27 million in damages due to the Focke Wulf factory being bombed by the allies.  ITT also owned shares in the company that made radar equipment that helped the Nazi's locate and destroy allied submarines.

 

Lorenz is OK now, but 25 years ago their Navigation Equipment could not find anything for Autopilot accurately in the Med with its old 3 transmitter system, amazed if it found a Flotilla of Aircraft Carriers back then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, The Renegade said:

Since this marathon of 409 pages was started by a Guardian opinion piece. That media outlet that is a solid supporter of Brexit abd totally non partisan.

 

It seems appropriate to bring to the table an up to date Guardian opinion piece.

 

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/14/jeremy-corbyn-wants-hard-brexit-labour

 

Jeremy Corbyn voted no in 1975 and he voted no in every single parliamentary vote on EU Treaties ever since.

 

Nice to see that you are finally getting the message that Labour are not the saviours that are going to stop Brexit.

 

Back to article after article about Blair & Mandelson.

I've never been looking for JC to save us from Brexit - I'm looking for the inherent contradictions in Brexit to save us. No one can deliver any sort of sensible Brexit - the only one on offer is a hard Brexit that will wreck the economy. No sensible government is going to willingly give us that as they will be out of power for a generation.

 

Edited by tebee
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, tebee said:

I've never been looking for JC to save us from Brexit - I'm looking for the inherent contradictions in Brexit to save us. No one can deliver any sort of sensible Brexit - the only one on offer is a hard Brexit that will wreck the economy. No sensible government is going to willingly give us that as they will be out of power for a generation.

 

I am sure I am stating the obvious here, but this is the reason for the ongoing demonisation of the left. The Tories need to paint Labour as being the worst possible outcome for the country, and as long as the gullible public keeps swallowing the propaganda, TM has leeway to keep fighting to keep the Tories together, no matter the cost to the country and its citizens.

 

The anti-semitism nonsense seems to have been dropped now that the local elections are over in England but no doubt it, or some other confected nonsense will appear again when the need arises.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The Renegade said:

It will wreck the economy ?

 

Of course it will, and a plague of locusts will descend consuming everything, brimstone and fire will thunder down from the sky, ebola and the black death will follow up to kill off any survivors.

 

Why are you worried about the economy ?

 

Wreck the economy, hyperbole. Will the UK's economy take a hit, most likely.

 

But let's not get carried away.

Is your confidence based on reassuring, credible analysis? That has been sorely missing to date, so it would be comforting to hear some expert words that don't paint a doomsday scenario for us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RuamRudy said:

Is your confidence based on reassuring, credible analysis? That has been sorely missing to date, so it would be comforting to hear some expert words that don't paint a doomsday scenario for us.

So why/how did the UK bounce back after the Hitler thingy.....?

 

There were those in the UK that feared him and wanted to join the chap...:smile:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, The Renegade said:

It will wreck the economy ?

 

Of course it will, and a plague of locusts will descend consuming everything, brimstone and fire will thunder down from the sky, ebola and the black death will follow up to kill off any survivors.

 

Why are you worried about the economy ?

 

Wreck the economy, hyperbole. Will the UK's economy take a hit, most likely.

 

But let's not get carried away.

According to the Government's own analysis hard brexit will result in a 7.7% reduction in GDP and up to 2 million more unemployed. 

 

https://www.parliament.uk/documents/commons-committees/Exiting-the-European-Union/17-19/Cross-Whitehall-briefing/EU-Exit-Analysis-Cross-Whitehall-Briefing.pdf

 

 

We will for a start lose most of the car industry and most of the services we sell to the EU.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, The Renegade said:

Analysis is not fact. 

 

A 7.7% reduction in GDP is not a collapse of the UK economy.

 

A large number of those ( according to remainers ) will be EU Citizens returning home, so it will not be 2 million more unemployed.

 

It would be prudent to await the outcome of any negotiations before making bold predictions.

 

Facts emerge after an event. Hyperbole emerges before an event happens.

That seems a somewhat cavalier attitude to take, especially when considering the collective calibre of the minds that suggest we should be fearful.

 

I think, though, that you are accepting of the analysis - you are just saying that the effects won't hurt as much we fear, and that the pain will be worth it in the long run. Is that a fair intepretation of your position?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

That seems a somewhat cavalier attitude to take, especially when considering the collective calibre of the minds that suggest we should be fearful.

 

I think, though, that you are accepting of the analysis - you are just saying that the effects won't hurt as much we fear, and that the pain will be worth it in the long run. Is that a fair intepretation of your position?

You are now dodging......bravo.gif.13287febef2e87e1b0d91c4cc7e44a9a.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, transam said:

You are now dodging......bravo.gif.13287febef2e87e1b0d91c4cc7e44a9a.gif

I don't see a question in the post I was responding too so I am not sure what I am dodging - my point remains that in the absence of fact, we must rely upon opinion. The experts are mostly of the opinion that the effects will be detrimental to us all. Give me expert analysis that suggests otherwise and I will take a look - but after 2 years, there still seems to be none.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, oldhippy said:

How is running away from hunger and disease any different from running away from war? They are both killers.

Hundreds of thousands of fit, healthy looking young men arriving in Europe in their designer jeans, clutching their iPhone’s and iPad’s, didn't much look like they were running away from hunger and disease.

 

I have always believed in the obligation of the UK and the EU to assist and offer refuge to genuine refugees. I have also always believed in rejecting economic migrants masquerading as refugees; whereas you seem either unaware or just plain obdurate to the existence of this massive migrant group, which are a much bigger problem to Europe than the genuine refugees.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, transam said:

Did the UK pay the loans back and still became a world financial power...YES or NO....?

 

 

The factors that contributed to that success are many, and much of them are no longer relevant in this day and age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

That seems a somewhat cavalier attitude to take, especially when considering the collective calibre of the minds that suggest we should be fearful.

 

I think, though, that you are accepting of the analysis - you are just saying that the effects won't hurt as much we fear, and that the pain will be worth it in the long run. Is that a fair intepretation of your position?

I thought my comment was straight forward and very self explanatory.

 

How you interpret that comment is entirely down to you.

 

If you have a specific question regarding my comment, pose that question and I will answer it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

I don't see a question in the post I was responding too so I am not sure what I am dodging - my point remains that in the absence of fact, we must rely upon opinion. The experts are mostly of the opinion that the effects will be detrimental to us all. Give me expert analysis that suggests otherwise and I will take a look - but after 2 years, there still seems to be none.

Hitler bombing the UK was fact, the UK was out gunned, but the UK prevailed against all the odds and came back to be one of the best financial countries in the world even being one of the smallest..........You have no answers to that....

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, RuamRudy said:

The factors that contributed to that success are many, and much of them are no longer relevant in this day and age.

I think you are lost in space...You have no answers.....bravo.gif.7333185f98a97c675f46d64ea80e735d.gif

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, transam said:

Hitler bombing the UK was fact, the UK was out gunned, but the UK prevailed against all the odds and came back to be one of the best financial countries in the world even being one of the smallest..........You have no answers to that....

You are mixing up two threads now... but are you forgetting about the empire and backs of the colonies that we stood upon for so long? WWII was no David and Goliath contest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...