DrTuner Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 I believe her. Makes perfect sense to trust someone whose day job is to project false images of enjoyable sex acts. Just like trusting a prostitute, they'd never ever lie, utterly unheard of, where would they even practice such a heinous thing? Then, of course, I've been reading CNN for the last 5 minutes and can feel parts of my brain shutting off in self-defense. Might have something to do with it. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 2 hours ago, Berkshire said: While I thank you for your response, it is largely based on a false premise. Clinton was not given a pass and was dragged over the coals for what he did....and the MSM was all over it. He was ultimately impeached by the House, but was acquitted by the Senate. So you're wrong. You Trump guys always bring up the same argument, even though it's been debunked time and time again. Well, I remember it quite well and while the GOP did him hard the media were sympathetic to him, as was I, as I thought it none of anyone's business in the first place to even be going on about it, just like this is none of anyone else's business what happened 12 years ago. Re the OP, I haven't seen a shred of evidence that she was threatened. Did she go to the police- nothing about that on the media that I've heard, and if she didn't why not? Her child ( who must be humiliated now ) was threatened with harm, according to her. Without the "threats", even if she is telling the truth, by her own admission the "affair" is that of a woman that freely has sex with a married man ( wouldn't be the first time in history that happened! ) once because she agreed to, even if she didn't "want to" ( strange that she did it then ), wasn't paid for it then, and kept her mouth shut about it for years. Not really worth the media frenzy. Even the anti Trump opinion presenters are let down about the interview. Oh well, on to the next "scandal", but don't hold your breath waiting for something "real'. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Berkshire Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 8 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: Well, I remember it quite well and while the GOP did him hard the media were sympathetic to him, as was I, as I thought it none of anyone's business in the first place to even be going on about it, just like this is none of anyone else's business what happened 12 years ago. Re the OP, I haven't seen a shred of evidence that she was threatened. Did she go to the police- nothing about that on the media that I've heard, and if she didn't why not? Her child ( who must be humiliated now ) was threatened with harm, according to her. Without the "threats", even if she is telling the truth, by her own admission the "affair" is that of a woman that freely has sex with a married man ( wouldn't be the first time in history that happened! ) once because she agreed to, even if she didn't "want to" ( strange that she did it then ), wasn't paid for it then, and kept her mouth shut about it for years. Not really worth the media frenzy. Even the anti Trump opinion presenters are let down about the interview. Oh well, on to the next "scandal", but don't hold your breath waiting for something "real'. Yeah, all of the lurid and tawdry stuff doesn't really mean much...except it does put the religious right who support Trump in a rather hypocritical position. But the meat of this is going to be the laws Trump/Cohen did violate related to campaign financing. I understand Mueller is looking at that. As for the cover-up and denials....that just goes to Trump's credibility. No hardcore Trump supporter is going to change their mind and it just reinforces the other side. So if this thing drags out, the GOP may have a problem with women voters come mid-terms. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 It might end up meaning a LOT. Cohen has rather clearly broken the campaign financing law. At the least that could mean being disbarred but he's probably in danger of prison. Mueller will be "speaking" to Cohen. Mueller has something on Cohen. If Cohen wants to avoid the legal consequences, he's going to have to give Mueller something. Get it? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 1 minute ago, Berkshire said: No hardcore Trump supporter is going to change their mind and it just reinforces the other side. So if this thing drags out, the GOP may have a problem with women voters come mid-terms. Correct on the first sentence. I think every female voter that voted for Trump has heard the p***y tapes that were published during the campaign. I was surprised that he actually survived that, but he did, and if that didn't put them off, a bit of consensual rumpty probably won't next time. I don't see why it would make any difference mid term. They may lose the house, but not, IMO, because of something he did 12 years ago. BTW, she changed from Democrat to GOP because she feels they represent her values better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thaibeachlovers Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Jingthing said: It might end up meaning a LOT. Cohen has rather clearly broken the campaign financing law. At the least that could mean being disbarred but he's probably in danger of prison. Mueller will be "speaking" to Cohen. Mueller has something on Cohen. If Cohen wants to avoid the legal consequences, he's going to have to give Mueller something. Get it? Mueller? So, must have something to do with Russia. Is she a Russian agent? Edited March 27, 2018 by thaibeachlovers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 59 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said: Well, I remember it quite well and while the GOP did him hard the media were sympathetic to him, as was I, as I thought it none of anyone's business in the first place to even be going on about it, just like this is none of anyone else's business what happened 12 years ago. Re the OP, I haven't seen a shred of evidence that she was threatened. Did she go to the police- nothing about that on the media that I've heard, and if she didn't why not? Her child ( who must be humiliated now ) was threatened with harm, according to her. Without the "threats", even if she is telling the truth, by her own admission the "affair" is that of a woman that freely has sex with a married man ( wouldn't be the first time in history that happened! ) once because she agreed to, even if she didn't "want to" ( strange that she did it then ), wasn't paid for it then, and kept her mouth shut about it for years. Not really worth the media frenzy. Even the anti Trump opinion presenters are let down about the interview. Oh well, on to the next "scandal", but don't hold your breath waiting for something "real'. Yes. So far it’s been mostly (though not entirely) pure salaciousness. We haven’t seen anything concrete that would seriously damage Trump with his base, or even legally (except maybe a fine). If you look at the emoluments clause, Trump’s been getting away with a lot worse. On the plus side, this will be the first porn star vid I’d watched without having to scrub my browser history. However, this drip, drip, drip can’t be good for Trump’s mental state. And that should makes us all worry. Stormy’s lawyer is a master troll—always promising something, never quite delivering, but delivering *just* enough to keep us tuning in. Maybe he really has something. But in the meantime it’s a slow motion train wreck that might not even be a train wreck that the world can’t stop staring at. The entire spectacle damages America and Americans, whether deservedly or not. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyJ Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) 5 hours ago, Thakkar said: It's sad when an aging, saggy titted, bottled blond slut will do anything for attention, but we've all come to expect that from Trump. I find the "slut shaming" of Stormy Daniels to be very hypocritical. (Thakkar is one of many). Everyone who has a computer has looked at porn on the internet. That includes everyone reading this forum, including Thakkar and the others who have posted similar disparaging comments. So it's ok to look at porn, but the people who provide the porn are sluts and whores. Nonsense. Some may be, some not. Sex work is a job. They are more honest and above board than someone like Melania Knauss imo. Edited March 27, 2018 by JimmyJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyJ Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 7 hours ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said: I don't mind a bit of spanking. But it was the part about Trump supposedly talking about his daughter and comparing Stormy to his daughter -- while she's doing it -- that kind of creeped me out!!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) 14 minutes ago, JimmyJ said: I find the "slut shaming" of Stormy Daniels to be very hypocritical. (Thakkar is one of many). Everyone who has a computer has looked at porn on the internet. That includes everyone reading this forum, including Thakkar and the others who have posted similar disparaging comments. So it's ok to look at porn, but the people who provide the porn are sluts and whores. Nonsense. Some may be, some not. Sex work is a job. They are more honest and above board than someone like Melania Knauss imo. Even if you hadn’t missed the point of my post, your keyboard chivalry and self-righteous indignation is probably more condescending and insulting to truly liberated women (like Ms Daniels) than boors calling them names. Edited March 27, 2018 by Thakkar Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lungstib Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 12 minutes ago, JimmyJ said: Everyone who has a computer has looked at porn on the internet. That includes everyone reading this forum, I hate to have to break this to you but thats just not true. I have been on computer some 18 years and never opened a porn site. Never. Dont find the idea entertaining in any way, watching actors pretend to be doing what is best kept between good friends. Sorry about that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post JimmyJ Posted March 27, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) 8 minutes ago, Thakkar said: Even if you hadn’t missed the point of my post, your keyboard chivalry and self-righteous indignation is probably more condescending and insulting to truly liberated women (like Ms Daniels) than boors calling them names. Oops! Sorry Thakkar, apologies. Just re-read your post that (I thought) I was responding to. I read your comment too quickly and was already sick of seeing people disparage Daniels and certainly chose the wrong person to illustrate my point. My mistake. Edited March 27, 2018 by JimmyJ 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) 6 minutes ago, JimmyJ said: Oops! Sorry Thakkar, apologies. Just re-read your post that (I thought) I was responding to. I read your comment too quickly and was already sick of seeing people disparage Daniels and certainly chose the wrong person to illustrate my point. My mistake. No worries, mate. Excuse me if I seemed a tad harsh in my response. As a father of some truly liberated ladies, I get a little touchy with chivalry, because my view is: they don’t need any of it. It also annoys me when “stud” has good connotations and “slut” has bad connotations. And Daniels especially looks like she can take care of herself. Edited March 27, 2018 by Thakkar 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 22 minutes ago, JimmyJ said: Just call me Daddy.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jingthing Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 21 minutes ago, Lungstib said: I hate to have to break this to you but thats just not true. I have been on computer some 18 years and never opened a porn site. Never. Dont find the idea entertaining in any way, watching actors pretend to be doing what is best kept between good friends. Sorry about that. So you're the one! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted March 27, 2018 23 minutes ago, Lungstib said: I hate to have to break this to you but thats just not true. I have been on computer some 18 years and never opened a porn site. Never. Dont find the idea entertaining in any way, watching actors pretend to be doing what is best kept between good friends. Sorry about that. This reminds me of a relevant joke: while le most people go on Facebook to see what their old girlfriends are up to, Trump goes on Pornhub. 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyJ Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) 20 minutes ago, Thakkar said: ...Daniels especially looks like she can take care of herself. Yes, she's made a lot of fans with her Twitter ripostes. The Wirral @The_Wirral_Com @StormyDaniels Hi are you the American whore who wont keep your legs shut or your mouth 2:14 AM - 26 Mar 2018 Stormy DanielsVerified account @StormyDaniels Mar 26 "Yes, I am. Nice to meet ya!" ___________________________________________ Her response to another tweet: __________________________ Stormy DanielsVerified account @StormyDaniels Haha! What does that say about you since they got YOUR attention? Of course, my tits are fake (I've never claimed otherwise). Riding into my 60 Minutes interview on a <deleted> unicorn would be more believable than my boobs being all natural. Edited March 27, 2018 by JimmyJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyJ Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 "News In Photos Stormy Daniels ‘60 Minutes’ Interview Leads To Spike In PornHub Searches For Anderson Cooper" https://politics.theonion.com/stormy-daniels-60-minutes-interview-leads-to-spike-in-1824075371 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 12 minutes ago, Thakkar said: This reminds me of a relevant joke: while le most people go on Facebook to see what their old girlfriends are up to, Trump goes on Pornhub. And those are just the two we KNOW about. The guy's been around a long time. If anyone thinks they're the ONLY two, they're dreamin! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alocacoc Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) It's probably only a matter of time till we learn about the real deal between Stormy and the media/dems/whoever. The entire story is so fishy, only ignorants can't see it. Stormy gets older, her career is over, she needs money. Easy as that. Edited March 27, 2018 by alocacoc 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Opl Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 "Her experience is not so far from that of, say, Melania Trump, or any other gorgeous women who explicitly or implicitly trade their desirability for wealth by giving older, decrepit men marriage, sex, or companionship. Trump himself might admire her business chops—“She likes to maximize her profits,” if he wasn’t so busy trying to shut her up. " https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2018/03/on-60-minutes-stormy-daniels-found-the-venue-her-story-needed.html Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted March 27, 2018 13 minutes ago, alocacoc said: It's probably only a matter of time till we learn about the real deal between Stormy and the media/dems/whoever. The entire story is so fishy, only ignorants can't see it. Stormy gets older, her career is over, she needs money. Easy as that. You find this fishy (and maybe it is)? With your nose for fishyness, don’t you also find it fishy that multiple members of Trump’s campaign had multiple unauthorized contacts with Russian operatives, failed to declare them as required, then lied about them, then lied about the nature of those contacts, then admitted to them when pressed but claimed it was perfectly innocent, these meetings that they admitted to in a most constipated manner? 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alocacoc Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 Just now, Thakkar said: You find this fishy (and maybe it is)? With your nose for fishyness, don’t you also find it fishy that multiple members of Trump’s campaign had multiple unauthorized contacts with Russian operatives, failed to declare them as required, then lied about them, then lied about the nature of those contacts, then admitted to them when pressed but claimed it was perfectly innocent, these meetings that they admitted to in a most constipated manner? Don't deflect. It haves nothing to do with Russians. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 25 minutes ago, TallGuyJohninBKK said: And those are just the two we KNOW about. The guy's been around a long time. If anyone thinks they're the ONLY two, they're dreamin! Hey, I don’t blame the man. With those tiny, tiny hands, he has to try on a lotta gloves to find ones that fit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) Opinion piece from the NY Times yesterday... (Love the headline! ) Quote Stormy Daniels Spanks Trump Again Michelle Goldberg MARCH 26, 2018 Because there is broad consensus that Donald Trump is a lewd degenerate, nothing Stormy Daniels, the pornographic film actress and director, told “60 Minutes” about their alleged 2006 sexual encounter was particularly astonishing. (Though the mental image of Trump dropping his pants at Daniels’s command for a spanking will likely dampen libidos throughout the land.) Everyone knows Trump is a disloyal husband, so it’s no shock that he slept with Daniels — and, at about the same time, with the former Playboy model Karen McDougal — while his wife, Melania Trump, was caring for their new baby. Everyone also knows that Trump has a repulsive compulsion to sexualize his daughter Ivanka — he once happily concurred with Howard Stern that she was a “piece of ass” — so it’s not surprising that he told Daniels she reminded him of his child before he slept with her. (According to McDougal, Trump said something similar to her.) MORE: Edited March 27, 2018 by TallGuyJohninBKK 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TallGuyJohninBKK Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, Thakkar said: Hey, I don’t blame the man. With those tiny, tiny hands, he has to try on a lotta gloves to find ones that fit. Well, as he's already told the world, he certainly knows where to grab in order to get his scores.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thakkar Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 4 minutes ago, alocacoc said: Don't deflect. It haves nothing to do with Russians. It has to do with your acuity to fish smells. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JimmyJ Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 (edited) "News in Brief New Report Finds Adult Film Star May Have Paid Over $130,000 To Cover Up Sexual Encounter With Trump" "NEW YORK—Alleging she was deeply concerned about the destructive effect the revelation could have on her reputation, a new report released Tuesday suggests that adult film star Stormy Daniels may have paid over $130,000 to cover up a sexual encounter with Donald Trump. “Newly uncovered legal documents seem to indicate that Ms. Daniels paid out six figures to keep Trump quiet about a sexual encounter that undoubtedly would have proved embarrassing and perhaps career-threatening..." https://politics.theonion.com/new-report-finds-adult-film-star-may-have-paid-over-13-1822124133 Edited March 27, 2018 by JimmyJ 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MaeJoMTB Posted March 27, 2018 Share Posted March 27, 2018 So this thread is essentially guys living in Thailand bashing a guy in America for using hookers? You gotta laugh! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now