I feel obligated to give a helping hand to the demented and insane POTUS and define for him what the term "Evidence" means. The old coot seems to think ego-saving fantasy equates to evidence, and so long as the dum-est of the dum(b) (aka, the few remaining MAGAs) believe it, it's admissible in a court of law.....as least so long as your attorney is the Court Jester. Let's say a guy stole boxes and boxes of highly classified documents, including those classified as TS, SCI, Codeword, HCS and RD, and kept they scattered around, say, a wedding planner facility. Suppose he further claimed BOTH that he "declassified them with his mind" as well as claiming the FBI planted them. Suppose additionally that such a statement is patently false both because there is a procedure and mechanism for actual declassification that leaves a paper trail (which does not exist in this instance) and that documents classified RD can only be declassified by the Dept of Energy (as they related to nuclear matters). Finally, let's say he was ordered to return what he had no right to steal, and that he claimed he returned everything, when in fact he lied and continued to keep documents, necessitating a search by Federal authorities, as national security was threatened as well as the identities of foreign clandestine assets. Donny, THAT ^ is what constitutes "evidence", which can be submitted to the courts without need a Court Jester to do it.
Create an account or sign in to comment