Jump to content

Under pressure from Trump, FBI and Justice agree to expanded Russia probe


webfact

Recommended Posts

Under pressure from Trump, FBI and Justice agree to expanded Russia probe

By Steve Holland

 

2018-05-21T214033Z_1_LYNXNPEE4K1KO_RTROPTP_4_USA-TRUMP-RUSSIA.JPG

U.S. Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein departs the West Wing of the White House after a meeting on FBI investigations into the 2016 Trump presidential campaign with U.S. President Donald Trump at the White House in Washington, U.S., May 21, 2018. REUTERS/Carlos Barria

 

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Justice Department on Monday agreed to expand its investigation into alleged Russia collusion in the 2016 election to include "any irregularities" in FBI tactics involving Trump's presidential campaign, a White House spokeswoman said.

 

Trump suggested on Friday that the FBI might have planted or recruited an informant in his presidential campaign for political purposes, citing unidentified reports that at least one FBI representative was "implanted."

 

The agreement came during a meeting that Trump had with Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein and Federal Bureau of Investigation Director Christopher Wray, the spokeswoman, Sarah Sanders, said.

 

The Justice Department "has asked the inspector general to expand its current investigation to include any irregularities with the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s or the Department of Justice’s tactics concerning the Trump Campaign," Sanders said in a statement.

 

Federal investigators are probing whether anyone in the Trump campaign worked with Russia to sway the election to the Republican candidate. Trump has denied any collusion and repeatedly dismissed the investigation as a "witch hunt."

 

Trump said in a Twitter post on Sunday that he would demand the Justice Department look into whether the FBI "infiltrated or surveilled the Trump Campaign for Political Purposes - and if any such demands or requests were made by people within the Obama Administration!"

 

Hours later, a spokeswoman said the department asked its inspector general to expand a review of the process for requesting surveillance warrants to include determining whether there was impropriety or political motivation in how the FBI conducted its investigation.The FBI was looking into Trump election campaign ties to Moscow before Special Counsel Robert Mueller took over the probe a year ago.

 

"If anyone did infiltrate or surveil participants in a presidential campaign for inappropriate purposes, we need to know about it and take appropriate action," Rosenstein said in a statement on Sunday evening.

 

Democrats said Mueller and his investigation should be protected and information, such as about any informant, should not be shared with Congress.

 

Justice Department "regulations protect this type of information from disclosure to Congress for legitimate investigative and privacy reasons,” Senator Dianne Feinstein, the top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, said in a letter to Rosenstein on Monday.

 

Trump has shown increasing signs of impatience with the investigation led by Mueller as it enters its second year, saying it was politically motivated and had its roots in the administration of Democratic President Barack Obama.

 

His Republican allies in Congress, led by House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, have pushed the same message.

 

In March, the Justice Department's inspector general launched a review into allegations by Republican lawmakers that the FBI made serious missteps when it sought a warrant to monitor a former adviser to Trump’s 2016 election campaign.

 

Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz said his review will examine whether the FBI and Justice Department followed proper procedures when they applied for a warrant with the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to secretly conduct surveillance on former adviser Carter Page and his ties to Russia.

 

Republican U.S. Representative Lee Zeldin said he and 16 other members of Congress will introduce a resolution on Tuesday alleging Justice Department and FBI misconduct involving surveillance in the Trump-Russia probe.

 

Neither Trump nor his new lawyer, Rudy Giuliani, provided any evidence of government infiltration into Trump’s presidential campaign.

 

The New York Times, citing people familiar with the matter, reported that the FBI sent an informant to talk to two Trump campaign advisers, Page and George Papadopoulos, after the agency received evidence that the two men had suspicious contacts linked to Russia during the campaign.

 

Papadopoulos pleaded guilty last fall to lying to FBI agents about his contacts with Russia.

 

(Reporting by Steve Holland, Doina Chiacu, Roberta Rampton and Patricia Zengerle; editing by Cynthia Osterman)

 
reuters_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright Reuters 2018-05-22
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, attrayant said:

Pardon me for not being current on all the conspiracy theory jargon, but what exactly is "deep state news"?

Crossfire Hurricane

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That doesn't help either.  Would it be asking too much to answer with a complete sentence?

 

[edit] Does this have something to do with the conspiracy theory that Trump's own Justice Department is out to get him?

 

 

 

Edited by attrayant
I took a guess
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, attrayant said:

That doesn't help either.  Would it be asking too much to answer with a complete sentence?

 

[edit] Does this have something to do with the conspiracy theory that Trump's own Justice Department is out to get him?

 

 

 

"The FBI surveilled Trump's campaign. Only the motive and who gave the orders remains a mystery, but it won't remain for long".

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/05/21/fbi-probe-donald-trump-campaign-russia-witch-hunt-column/628652002/

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, cycolista said:

One would assume that if you hire people with ties to Russia to run your campaign you should expect to draw the attention of the FBI. 

Who are you speaking about  cycolista?Also its not a crime to have dealings with Russia

Edited by riclag
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I read that whole opinion piece.  Still no mention of the phrase "deep state media".

 

Figuring this was a dog whistle that I couldn't hear, I had to resort to trolling through the dank underbelly of the internet blogosphere and finally found one mention of it:

 

"In short: The Deep State media game afoot here is to protect the Deep State buddies by slow-rolling out the news that affects them negatively"

 

In other words, Fox News?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, cycolista said:

One would assume that if you hire people with ties to Russia to run your campaign you should expect to draw the attention of the FBI. 

Exactly - as soon as the FBI had any reasonable basis to suspect that members of the Trump campaign were in contact with a foreign power and potentially soliciting and/or receiving assistance from them in relation to the election campaign, they would be duty-bound to look into it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, attrayant said:

I read that whole opinion piece.  Still no mention of the phrase "deep state media".

 

Figuring this was a dog whistle that I couldn't hear, I had to resort to trolling through the dank underbelly of the internet blogosphere and finally found one mention of it:

 

"In short: The Deep State media game afoot here is to protect the Deep State buddies by slow-rolling out the news that affects them negatively"

 

In other words, Fox News?

I never said deep state media, I talked about the deep state in the news is carrying the news for many days

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, riclag said:

Who are you speaking about  cycolista?Also its not a crime to have dealings with Russia

It is, if those dealings involve a Federal election. As clearly stated on the Federal Election Commission's website:

 

Quote

[The] Federal Election Campaign Act (the Act) and Commission regulations, [...] include a broad prohibition on foreign national activity in connection with elections in the United States.

Federal Election Commission website

 

Included in the things prohibited (and therefore against the law) is for an individual to solicit:

 

Quote

 any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value

In relation to a campaign.

 

 

Edited by GroveHillWanderer
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, riclag said:

I never said deep state media, I talked about the deep state in the news is carrying the news for many days

 

News, media, isn't that the same thing?  We've been going back and forth on this point so much, I had forgotten what it was I was trying to get a straight answer about.

 

Never the less, it seems like a convoluted way of saying the media is being selective in their reporting.  Do you think they've been aware of all this for some time and just not reported on it?  How do you know?  (expecting the answer "we'll see soon enough")

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real story is Rosenstein agrees to Trump’s request, in doing so Rosenstein keeps his job.

 

While Rosenstein keeps his job, so does Mueller - the real investigation into the real crimes continues.

 

For Illiberals this isn’t even a Pyrrhic victory. 

The president has given his approval to expand an investigation he’s all along claimed illegitimate, he’s secured Mueller’s position and he’s distracted his base while the wheels of justice grind on getting ever closer to him and his family.

 

Please illiberals, don’t log off never to be seen again when Trump’s crimes are exposed, we’ll have much to discus and so much fun doing so.

 

The truth will (despite Trump’s best efforts) out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, riclag said:

I sense this is going off topic ,I was responding to cycolista -Post # 13

Ok, so you mention 'deep state news', when asked to explain can not do that, and in the end decide it is going off topic.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Exactly - as soon as the FBI had any reasonable basis to suspect that members of the Trump campaign were in contact with a foreign power and potentially soliciting and/or receiving assistance from them in relation to the election campaign, they would be duty-bound to look into it.

 

Do you think they investigated the very large donation the German government made to the Clinton Foundation to?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, attrayant said:

Pardon me for not being current on all the conspiracy theory jargon, but what exactly is "deep state news"?

 

some enlightenment on the term "deep state" heres an interesting interview hosted by respected former US senator and surgeon Dr. Ron Paul. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:
53 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Do you think they investigated the very large donation the German government made to the Clinton Foundation to?

Link?

 

 

one simply needs to google "clinton cash" . a best selling book and documentary you can see free online.

 

to be fair theres crooks in both parties, both sides, it's simply a matter of weeding them out whomever they may be.

 

former independent minnesota governor and navy seal jessy ventura calls it like it is

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, atyclb said:

 

 

one simply needs to google "clinton cash" . a best selling book and documentary you can see free online.

 

to be fair theres crooks in both parties, both sides, it's simply a matter of weeding them out whomever they may be.

 

former independent minnesota governor and navy seal jessy ventura calls it like it is

 

 

A good critique of the two party system and the corporate money slushing around government.

 

But no evidence to back up your claim v HC and German money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...