Trump's blocking of critics on Twitter violates Constitution: U.S. judge

[UncleTouchyFingers]

1 hour ago, Becker said:

Again, when asked for facts backing up your statement you again resort to obfuscations and diversions. No surprise.

 

So your argument is basically “prove it” lmfao. 

 

38 minutes ago, Srikcir said:

... elected public officials regardless of political party (there are more than two) who use government tweet handles. Do you agree?

 

 

Sure but trump isn’t using a government twitter handle and that’s the messed up part. 

[Becker]

13 minutes ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:

 

So your argument is basically “prove it” lmfao. 

 

Yes, I know that being asked to back up statements by facts is not really a man-child supporter's thing. Who cares about facts as long as he pays lip service to the pipe dream of "MAWA", right?

[stevenl]

3 hours ago, UncleTouchyFingers said:

 

So your argument is basically “prove it” lmfao. 

 

 

Sure but trump isn’t using a government twitter handle and that’s the messed up part. 

He is, the government has declared it to be an official policy handle.

[Redline]

On 5/24/2018 at 7:18 AM, UncleTouchyFingers said:

 

Clinton appointee, Manhattan, etc...

 

And she didn't issue an injunction, just a "declaration" (meaningless) so Trump can still do whatever he wants. 

 

Just more feel-good liberal nothing-burgers and politicization of the judicial process. 

 

Although this will surely make the liberal nazis feel great for a half-second until they realize its all just an attention grab. 

 

The greater crime is Twitter itself (and facebook) openly filtering conservative free speech under the guise of "improving the conversation".  

Awe, can’t take how the world works.  More sulking won’t sold anything ?

[Scott]

Troll post and reply removed.  

 

[zydeco]

Some people on this forum seem to obsess about Trump 24/7/365. He is really in ya'll's heads, ain't he?