Jump to content

Reforms will take time to yield results, says Prayut


webfact

Recommended Posts

Reforms will take time to yield results, says Prayut

By THE NATION

 

64b3ec9096f32a47fc0662baaa9bf8e5.jpeg

 

PRIME MINISTER Prayut Chan-o-cha yesterday hit back at critics who accused his government of failing to eliminate poverty after four years of reforming the country.

 

Prayut said his government had addressed the country’s issues systematically and those efforts would take time before achievements resulting from reforms could be seen.

 

Over the past four years, reforms had been made to the country’s laws, public administration and other systems, he said.

“It is difficult to reform the entire system because it involves many people,” the PM said.

 

He also said Thailand needed to manage its water resources carefully and efficiently in order to prevent a future shortage of water.

 

“I am worried that climate change may lead to a water shortage and a war to fight for water. Thailand relies mainly on rainfall for our water supply. What will we do without rainfall?” he said.

 

Prayut called for cooperation between the government, authorities and citizens to deal with environmental issues, particularly those regarding encroachment of national forests and illegal logging.

 

He said Thailand, being an agricultural country, had been directly affected by climate change. He added that the country needed reform in the area of national resources and the environment.

 

The PM was speaking at Government House, where he presided over a seminar on the management of the country’s water resources. The event was attended by representatives from relevant state agencies, as well as governors from vasrious provinces.

 

“This seminar allows all sides to take part in the management of water throughout the country,” he told those present. “This is a preparation for dealing with water situations today and in the future, efficiently, for true integration.”

 

He said that as part of a national strategy, his government had taken measures to make sure there was a sufficient supply of water.

 

Among those measures, he said, was ensuring that underground water was being used properly in many areas to ease the problems resulting from drought and flooding.

 

He also implied that, unlike its predecessors, his government was more open about official statistics regarding the country’s water resources.

 

“We are planning for growing rice covering 60 million rai (9.6 million hectares) throughout the country. All sectors will be allocated 88,700 million cubic metres of water. After the rainy season, the country will have about 60,000 million cubic metres of water left for the next dry season. That is 10,910 million cubic metres more than the previous year,” Prayut said.

 

“Have you ever known about this information? Did any [past] government tell it to you like this? No.”

 

The PM disputed a claim made by some critics that the government’s water resource management strategy, covering the period from 2015 until 2026 meant he planned to be in power for the next eight years.

 

“Are they crazy?” he asked, stressing that that such a strategy was needed for long-term planning, not just for covering the term of his government.

 

Also, the PM said, new water sources were required to meet the upcoming higher demand in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC) project area. 

 

“Additional water sources are needed and we have five to 10 years to do so before a problem emerges. We need to start doing it from today,” he said.

 

Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30346980

 
thenation_logo.jpg
-- © Copyright The Nation 2018-06-05
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Never  seen it rain so much down in Prachuap in the last 5  years and not even into the rainiest months yet, Pranburi dam is very  full after 3-4  years of being almost empty

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, colinneil said:

Reform !! Reform my a++e.

They have reformed nothing and never will.

They can't reform

Maybe has something to do with the 75 % of the population that are are uneducated or farmers that are in hock to Loan sharks

Then you have Thai small business that can't understand that all incoming money is not all profit

 

& to sum it up the Chinese have been here for many years ripping the heart out of Thailand & its' people

 

But as long as the Thai people keep believing & waing to the upper levels they will be ok ( they never question why one should pay )

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

Does anyone think they should continue in power based on their demonstrated ability in governing?

 

Anyone?

 

Anyone?

 

No they should continue power based on their ability to debate and bear scrutiny.   ?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, webfact said:

“I am worried that climate change may lead to a water shortage and a war to fight for water. Thailand relies mainly on rainfall for our water supply. What will we do without rainfall?” he said

It takes a special sort to turn a discussion on poverty towards a fictitous war for water.

 

Seriously though, if that is his BIGGEST concern why does y he use some of the military budget for submarines or satellites to build desalination plants?

Edited by coulson
.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Samui Bodoh said:

This is the inherent problem; there has been lots of 'activity' but little has been done.

 

"Reforms made to the country's laws, public administration and other systems" is simply bureaucratic busy work that doesn't actually accomplish anything; outside of measures to ensure military dominance, I can't think of a substantive change that has occurred in the last four years.

 

That is what happens when you have no policy-making expertise or vision and you hand over that function to the Bureaucracy. And, that is why military people tend to be lousy, terrible, incompetent governors. 

 

To wit; see the current Junta.

 

Does anyone think they should continue in power based on their demonstrated ability in governing?

 

Anyone?

 

Anyone?

 

 

Changing the way of life of Thais, whether with reforms or without them was never the objective of this government.

 

If effecting reforms on purpose is difficult, and I'm sure it would be, how unlikely is it that they will happen as a sub-agenda when the purpose of the coup was something else entirely?

Edited by KiwiKiwi
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, alant said:

Could this "it takes time" defence been used in Yinlucks arguement? 

In my opinion, the YL government could have been a great government, but was hampered by having to appoint the remnants of the Thaksin regime, people in Thaksin's mould, who were accordingly corrupt. This gave the opportunity for a coup, which had without a doubt been a long time in the treasonous planning.

 

While the opportunity for this kind of machination exists, there will be no shortage of thieves and robbers in Thailand to take the opportunities presented and make a quick buck. Prayuth had the opportunity to make a difference, but he was limited by the straight-jacket of his own incompetence and the reasons he was put up as a leader in the first place. Ipso facto, he failed, and was never expected to succeed in any way apart from overseeing a transition and making sure that the bricks and mortar for the intended post-transition agendas were laid.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.







×
×
  • Create New...