webfact Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 Council of State tasked with finding way out of primary voting dilemma By The Nation File photo The Council of State has been assigned to find a solution to allow political-party members’ participation in the selection of MP candidates, as the new timeframe set by the junta continues to pose problems for the primary voting required under the new law on political parties. Deputy Prime Minister Wissanu Krea-ngam said on Monday that the government’s recent talks with the involved agencies and political parties had come up with four options. The Council of State – which is the government’s legal advisory agency – is currently working around the four proposed solutions and will present drafts for the Election Commission (EC) to decide, said Wissanu, who oversees the government’s legal affairs. The alternatives to primary voting are: to waive the requirement for the first election to be held under the new law; to hold primary voting by province or by region (and not in all constituencies as required by law); and to find a completely new method. However, Wissanu explained that the new method should still allow participation by party members in the election candidates’ selection, in order to avoid violating the Constitution. In the meantime, the ruling National Council for Peace and Order will also deliberate on the matter and submit its opinions to the EC when considering the options, according to Wissanu. The trouble with the primary voting arises as the NCPO refuses to lift its ban on political activities, while the new organic law governing political parties has already taken effect and requires parties to make arrangements for the election within a given timeframe. Primary voting is one thing the law obliges parties to fulfill in order to ensure participation by their members and to prevent party executives’ centralisation of power. This is the first time the practice ihas been introduced in Thailand. The political-activities ban and the fact that the general election is drawing near have got politicians anxious about how they will be able to conduct the internal voting in time. Wissanu earlier divided the road map to democracy into three parts. The first 90 days from June to around September will be taken for the two last organic laws on the Senate and MPs to get royal endorsement. Any political activities require permission from the NCPO, which would consider them on a case-by-case basis, he said. The second 90 days after the organic laws are promulgated, the ban would be partially lifted for parties to prepare for the election. The last 150 days would be for organising the election, which according to the Constitution should take place within 150 days after the organic laws are in effect. Source: http://www.nationmultimedia.com/detail/politics/30349696 -- © Copyright The Nation 2018-07-10 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Lawrence Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 This cave disaster may put elections back? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post Samui Bodoh Posted July 9, 2018 Popular Post Share Posted July 9, 2018 54 minutes ago, webfact said: The trouble with the primary voting arises as the NCPO refuses to lift its ban on political activities, Hmm... Why don't they simply lift the ban on political activities? Problem solved. Idiots. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thailand Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 3 minutes ago, Samui Bodoh said: Hmm... Why don't they simply lift the ban on political activities? Problem solved. Idiots. Or simply cancel the fake "election". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SABloke Posted July 9, 2018 Share Posted July 9, 2018 So 90 days from September equals December, and then another 150 days equals May. So election in Jjne then? And why is the NCPO "deliberating" with the EC - the easiest way to solve this "problem" is to lift the ban on political activities. ? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Srikcir Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 4 hours ago, webfact said: to waive the requirement for the first election to be held under the new law When the NLA can waive the 2017 Constitution and related organic laws of qualification requirements for existing EC members, surely it can waive the primary for the first election. Or to "cut to the chase," Prayut can once again invoke Article 44 to correct another government mistake. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loh Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 9 minutes ago, Srikcir said: When the NLA can waive the 2017 Constitution and related organic laws of qualification requirements for existing EC members, surely it can waive the primary for the first election. Or to "cut to the chase," Prayut can once again invoke Article 44 to correct another government mistake. They can but wouldn't. Power is intoxicating. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
candide Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Maybe the reason why the junta seems ready to waive the primary elections obligation, is that because they want to make sure the right puppets are at the head of pro-military parties. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robblok Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 46 minutes ago, candide said: Maybe the reason why the junta seems ready to waive the primary elections obligation, is that because they want to make sure the right puppets are at the head of pro-military parties. Maybe, whatever their reason is im sure it will benefit them. I have yet to see a government making decisions that put them at a disadvantage. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 This saga further highlights the incompetence of the current administration. That and I doubt there are many people left who actually believe the upcoming elections will be free and fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eric Loh Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 1 hour ago, robblok said: Maybe, whatever their reason is im sure it will benefit them. I have yet to see a government making decisions that put them at a disadvantage. This junta government does have unique power from an obedient NLA and article 44 to make decision than an elected government. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
robblok Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Just now, Eric Loh said: This junta government does have unique power from an obedient NLA and article 44 to make decision than an elected government. Yes they do making it easier for them to push their plans through, not a good thing at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sjaak327 Posted July 10, 2018 Share Posted July 10, 2018 Yes they do making it easier for them to push their plans through, not a good thing at all.Actually since the nla itself is a farce, all article 44 does is speed up the process, in reality whatever the NCPO says is law. Sent from my SM-J730GM using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now