Accuser of Trump's Supreme Court nominee to testify on Thursday

[joecoolfrog]

10 hours ago, MikeChm said:

Man child? He is a billionare. Can you, do you have the ability to be a billionare? 

Pretty easy if you are given $200 million to start with !

[quandow]

20 hours ago, helpisgood said:

There is a new female accuser regarding sexual misconduct at a Yale Univ. party and Kavanaugh as reported to the New Yorker's Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer:

And THIS accuser has a corroborating witness.

[dcutman]

Supposedly the women wanted total anonymity at one time. Supposedly one of the two democrat senators that received her letter, leaked it to the Washington Post. The letter was marked confidential and she reiterated in the letter for it to remain confidential.

The strange thing is she could have testified to the senate in a number of ways, particularly in private, but she chose to have a televised public event. It would be my guess she was the one than contacted the Washington Post because her story was not getting out to the public.

It is amazing what people will do to get famous.

[Credo]

2 minutes ago, dcutman said:

Supposedly the women wanted total anonymity at one time. Supposedly one of the two democrat senators that received her letter, leaked it to the Washington Post. The letter was marked confidential and she reiterated in the letter for it to remain confidential.

The strange thing is she could have testified to the senate in a number of ways, particularly in private, but she chose to have a televised public event. It would be my guess she was the one than contacted the Washington Post because her story was not getting out to the public.

It is amazing what people will do to get famous.

No, what is amazing is how you and others will cast aspersions on anyone.   Kavenaugh is the accused predator.   She is the victim.   

 

 

[dcutman]

Just now, Credo said:

No, what is amazing is how you and others will cast aspersions on anyone.   Kavenaugh is the accused predator.   She is the victim.   

 

 

Most likely, that is exactly what she would like everybody to believe. And all Trump haters do. Its conceivable she is the predator and the Kavenaugh  is actually the victim. Her details very vague and her timing perfect. Cant wait to see what she has to say in this public circus she has requested. There will be more people watching this senate hearing than the super bowl.

[simple1]

8 minutes ago, dcutman said:

Most likely, that is exactly what she would like everybody to believe. And all Trump haters do. Its conceivable she is the predator and the Kavenaugh  is actually the victim. Her details very vague and her timing perfect. Cant wait to see what she has to say in this public circus she has requested. There will be more people watching this senate hearing than the super bowl.

No wonder sexual assault victims are loath to go public with the volume of unsupported accusations leveled for political purposes prior to hearings, including Trump who should be ashamed of himself. Every day Trump digs deeper in proving  himself to be unfit to represent the Office of the President of the USA.

[dcutman]

12 minutes ago, simple1 said:

No wonder sexual assault victims are loath to go public with the volume of unsupported accusations leveled for political purposes prior to hearings

She does not seem to have any problem going public, she requested a televised hearing, in fact it is one of the biggest public circus's in American history, with with less than unsupported accusations. Of the other 4 people she said that was in that house, 3 of them say they cant recall  her,  or the party she is claiming. No one seems to know who the fourth person is.

Who is the victim in this case?

 

Edited September 25, 2018 by dcutman

[Chomper Higgot]

50 minutes ago, dcutman said:

Supposedly the women wanted total anonymity at one time. Supposedly one of the two democrat senators that received her letter, leaked it to the Washington Post. The letter was marked confidential and she reiterated in the letter for it to remain confidential.

The strange thing is she could have testified to the senate in a number of ways, particularly in private, but she chose to have a televised public event. It would be my guess she was the one than contacted the Washington Post because her story was not getting out to the public.

It is amazing what people will do to get famous.

You need to get your facts straight.

It was a member of Feinstein’s staff who leaked Dr Ford’s letter to the press.

 

Mark Whelan (illiberal working on team Kavanaugh) was searching Dr Ford’s details on Linked before she was publically names as the accuser.

 

It was an Alt-Right Twitter Account that  leaked Dr Ford’s home address and personal details.

 

There is absolutely no evidence that Dr Ford has sought personal publicity in this matter.

 

http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/ct-kavanaugh-accuser-online-attacks-20180918-story.html

[stevenl]

24 minutes ago, dcutman said:

She does not seem to have any problem going public, she requested a televised hearing, in fact it is one of the biggest public circus's in American history, with with less than unsupported accusations. Of the other 4 people she said that was in that house, 3 of them say they cant recall  her,  or the party she is claiming. No one seems to know who the fourth person is.

Who is the victim in this case?

 

She didn't want to go public, nor did she request this hearing.

 

Please stop writing nonsense.

[dcutman]

7 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

 

There is absolutely no evidence that Dr Ford has sought personal publicity in this matter

Then why is she going to testify publicly, on television, on Thursday? She was given many options to testify, but she chose the most public way to do it. 

[stevenl]

6 minutes ago, dcutman said:

Then why is she going to testify publicly, on television, on Thursday? She was given many options to testify, but she chose the most public way to do it. 

You mean like an FBI investigation?

[wgdanson]

1 hour ago, quandow said:

And THIS accuser has a corroborating witness.

And says she is a devout Catholic..............yeh, going to a booze party playing spin the bottle. What was she expecting the outcome to be? 

[Scott]

2 minutes ago, wgdanson said:

And says she is a devout Catholic..............yeh, going to a booze party playing spin the bottle. What was she expecting the outcome to be? 

Continued victim blaming and suspensions will be given.  

 

[dcutman]

18 minutes ago, stevenl said:

She didn't want to go public, nor did she request this hearing.

 

Please stop writing nonsense.

However you would like to look at it.

 

Washington (CNN)Lawyers for Christine Blasey Ford said in a statement on Sunday that she has committed to testifying in an open hearing on Thursday about her allegation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/23/politics/christine-blasey-ford-senate/index.html

[Chomper Higgot]

18 minutes ago, dcutman said:

Then why is she going to testify publicly, on television, on Thursday? She was given many options to testify, but she chose the most public way to do it. 

Because her name, address and personal details have already been leaked to the public.

 

A question for you.

 

Why is Dr Ford giving her evidence to and being question by The Senate openly before the public a bad thing?

[stevenl]

2 minutes ago, dcutman said:

However you would like to look at it.

 

Washington (CNN)Lawyers for Christine Blasey Ford said in a statement on Sunday that she has committed to testifying in an open hearing on Thursday about her allegation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/23/politics/christine-blasey-ford-senate/index.html

Again, nonsense. She did all she could to avoid this circus.

[dcutman]

3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

6 minutes ago, dcutman said:

However you would like to look at it.

 

Washington (CNN)Lawyers for Christine Blasey Ford said in a statement on Sunday that she has committed to testifying in an open hearing on Thursday about her allegation of sexual assault against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh. https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/23/politics/christine-blasey-ford-senate/index.html

Again, nonsense. She did all she could to avoid this circus.

Oh really? How is that?

She was presented with every option to testify, most of witch were in private settings by anyone she felt most comfortable with. But yet she chose the public television circus option, by what is being describe buy the liberal media as be questioned by "angry white men".

[dcutman]

20 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Because her name, address and personal details have already been leaked to the public.

 

A question for you.

 

Why is Dr Ford giving her evidence to and being question by The Senate openly before the public a bad thing?

 

22 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Because her name, address and personal details have already been leaked to the public.

 

A question for you.

 

Why is Dr Ford giving her evidence to and being question by The Senate openly before the public a bad thing?

Its not a bad thing, it is suspicious that somebody that was supposedly seeking anonymity, and was proposed a multitude of more private options, would choose the most public option. We will have to get back to if there is any evidence, at this point it is only very vague aspects of her accounts and the accused and two witnesses claiming they do not recall even knowing her or being at such a party as she described.

[stevenl]

17 minutes ago, dcutman said:

Oh really? How is that?

She was presented with every option to testify, most of witch were in private settings by anyone she felt most comfortable with. But yet she chose the public television circus option, by what is being describe buy the liberal media as be questioned by "angry white men".

She was presented with every option?

 

Please stop, you're making a fool of yourself.

[geriatrickid]

23 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

IMO she won't make it to Thursday. None of her alibi witnesses have her back and her story is falling apart as we speak. 

 Rubbish. Why make up nonsense like this? Do you really believe it will help the case in support of the flawed nominee?

[dcutman]

35 minutes ago, stevenl said:

She was presented with every option?

 

Please stop, you're making a fool of yourself.

What option was she not afforded to testify?

[simple1]

2 hours ago, dcutman said:

She does not seem to have any problem going public, she requested a televised hearing, in fact it is one of the biggest public circus's in American history, with with less than unsupported accusations. Of the other 4 people she said that was in that house, 3 of them say they cant recall  her,  or the party she is claiming. No one seems to know who the fourth person is.

Who is the victim in this case?

 

At this stage nothing is proven. Until hearing are completed politicians and individuals should cease their nasty politically motivated witch hunt against the alleged victim. Others have now come foreward, IMO nomination hearings should be put on hold until these matters are cleared up one way or the other. Obviously could be wrong, but occurs to me the Republicans are creating a self defeating scenario with their awful responses, seems they have forgotten in the last election the reality is Trump only won by 77,744 votes to get the Electoral College nod.

Edited September 25, 2018 by simple1

[geriatrickid]

22 hours ago, alanrchase said:

Why does she need an alibi?

It's their strategy to blame the victims. No doubt we will be treated to more vile attempts at  character assassination.

The holy roller hypocrites are going to have a tough time bullying her for a lack of morality when she is accompanied by the members of the clergy who are in her immediate family.

The Kavanaugh arguments mirror the defense that the Roman Catholic church mounted when it was confronted with the thousands of cases of child molestation.

[brucec64]

16 minutes ago, simple1 said:

At this stage nothing is proven. Until hearing are completed politicians and individuals should cease their nasty politically motivated witch hunt against the alleged victim. Others have now come foreward, IMO nomination hearings should be put on hold until these matters are cleared up one way or the other. Obviously could be wrong, but occurs to me the Republicans are creating a self defeating scenario with their awful responses, seems they have forgotten in the last election the reality is Trump only won by 77,744 votes to get the Electoral College nod. 



Seems like they are playing the long game. Control of Presidency, Congress, Senate will always go back and forth each election, but Republicans will control the SC for the next 20 years a least if they can push this through. That's why it's getting so dirty on both sides.

 

The important thing to realize is that Republicans and Democrats do not care about these allegations, regardless of all the faux-outrage, and do not care about the alleged victims. They are simply pawns, and are being used as political ammunition.

Edited September 25, 2018 by brucec64

[DM07]

2 hours ago, wgdanson said:

And says she is a devout Catholic..............yeh, going to a booze party playing spin the bottle. What was she expecting the outcome to be? 

I have played spin the bottle and truth or dare many times!

Not ONCE has anybody being raped!

That is the outcome, everybody should and can expect! 

[quandow]

2 hours ago, wgdanson said:

And says she is a devout Catholic..............yeh, going to a booze party playing spin the bottle. What was she expecting the outcome to be? 

Catholics aren't perfect. They're forgiven.

[pedro01]

15 hours ago, stevenl said:

Again, nonsense. She did all she could to avoid this circus.

 

Yup - like writing a letter to a politician instead of reporting the issue to the police.