Jump to content

The Official Manchester City Thread


Jonathan Fairfield

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 7.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
1 hour ago, RickG16 said:

Not if you don't strengthen.

I think we will Rick, that front 3 need an equal standard back up. Aside that, maybe a left back understudy, attacking midfielder, and a CB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, BangrakBob said:

I think we will Rick, that front 3 need an equal standard back up. Aside that, maybe a left back understudy, attacking midfielder, and a CB. 

You will I agree... So it's lucky your management don't listen to you or @wilai !

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, RickG16 said:

You will I agree... So it's lucky your management don't listen to you or @wilai !

As I keep telling you Rick....the transfer window isn't even open yet. I trust JK to make the correct decisions at the right time and not to act like a kid in a candy store.....he's done ok so far!????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wilai said:

Good news Mr BJ....No ban and fine reduced to 10m.

 

This is what happens when you take the crooked bar stewards to a neutral court. UEFA only want the historical top table present and the corruption is in grained. Can't wait to read the full text.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if all those on here slagging us off after the crooked UEFA found us guilty will at least hold their hands up and admit they were wrong after a totally unbiased heard the case and found us innocent. There are a few on here whom I could dig up several horrible posts but I doubt they are man enough to at least recognise justice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrbojangles said:

I wonder if all those on here slagging us off after the crooked UEFA found us guilty will at least hold their hands up and admit they were wrong after a totally unbiased heard the case and found us innocent. There are a few on here whom I could dig up several horrible posts but I doubt they are man enough to at least recognise justice.

Always happy to admit I'm wrong.

 

So I take it you are asking me to believe that the CAS are uncorruptable saints unlike the evil UEFA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RickG16 said:

Always happy to admit I'm wrong.

 

So I take it you are asking me to believe that the CAS are uncorruptable saints unlike the evil UEFA?

 

Well let's put it this way. You were happy to believe UEFA and you would have believed CAS if they had found us guilty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mrbojangles said:

 

Well let's put it this way. You were happy to believe UEFA and you would have believed CAS if they had found us guilty. 

The point is why should we believe one body over another. All it is right now is UEFA's word vs CAS. 

 

But granted, it looks a lot better for you than if both had found you guilty. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, RickG16 said:

The point is why should we believe one body over another. All it is right now is UEFA's word vs CAS. 

 

But granted, it looks a lot better for you than if both had found you guilty. 

 

I don't know why but I really expected hoped that you'd acknowledge the result as fair. Should have known better

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrbojangles said:

 

I don't know why but I really expected hoped that you'd acknowledge the result as fair. Should have known better

I'm not saying it's unfair.... all I'm saying is let's not pretend we know what goes on in the corridors of these places.

 

Either way, I am definately happy to draw a line under it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, mrbojangles said:

I wonder if all those on here slagging us off after the crooked UEFA found us guilty will at least hold their hands up and admit they were wrong after a totally unbiased heard the case and found us innocent. There are a few on here whom I could dig up several horrible posts but I doubt they are man enough to at least recognise justice.

Champers won't be a happy fellow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, mrbojangles said:

 

Yep. Justice has been served ????

A 10 million euro fine for obstruction of the investigation and for disregarding the principle that allows such investigations. 

City’s deep pockets laughing at justice again (2014 style).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, twocatsmac said:

A 10 million euro fine for obstruction of the investigation and for disregarding the principle that allows such investigations. 

City’s deep pockets laughing at justice again (2014 style).

 

The fine was imposed by UEFA and was originally 30million. We said that we had given them everything and yeah we were pished off at them for reneging on the original 2014 deal. CAS found us totally innocent of the serious breach of FFP charge and reduced the fine down to 10m for the obstruction element. That outcome is probably better than anything we could have hoped for 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, mrbojangles said:

 

The fine was imposed by UEFA and was 30million. We said that we had given them everything and yeah we were pished off at them for renaging on the original 2014 deal. CAS found us totally innocent of the serious breach of FFP charge and reduced the fine down to 10m for the obstruction element. That outcome is probably better than anything we could have hoped for 

But do we know what the obstruction achieved? 

 

If you keep the policeman occupied at the front door while I flush the 'goods' down the toilet, that doesn't mean we are completely innocent.

 

I'm not saying that's what happened, but we are at least allowed to consider the possibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...