GalaxyMan Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 Whitewash expected, whitewash received. No surprise. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
neeray Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 43 minutes ago, xylophone said: To combat corruption in this country, esp amongst the "elite" would mean re-coding their DNA because that's how deep rooted it is. Another problem is that they have no sense of shame in telling bare-faced lies..............keep the masses poorly educated and they will believe and follow!! It really is a crock........... "no sense of shame in telling bare faced lies" This is the part that always gets me. I was raised to possess a sense of shame. Conversely speaking, I was raised to be proud. Getting caught in a bold faced lie is shameful. Stealing from the very people that you represent is shameful. Let's suppose that a "group" representing a people bought some submarines. For making that purchase, the group was given a million dollar gift, perhaps some expensive watches. Without that gift, these submarines could have been bought for a million dollars less, in my simple way of thinking. Thus, "the people" now must pay a million dollars more, even more with long term interest. But then the "group" got caught and "the group" showed "no sense of shame in telling bare faced lies". Obviously, money "trumps" shame. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
xylophone Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 7 minutes ago, neeray said: "no sense of shame in telling bare faced lies" This is the part that always gets me. I was raised to possess a sense of shame. Conversely speaking, I was raised to be proud. Getting caught in a bold faced lie is shameful. Stealing from the very people that you represent is shameful. Let's suppose that a "group" representing a people bought some submarines. For making that purchase, the group was given a million dollar gift, perhaps some expensive watches. Without that gift, these submarines could have been bought for a million dollars less, in my simple way of thinking. Thus, "the people" now must pay a million dollars more, even more with long term interest. But then the "group" got caught and "the group" showed "no sense of shame in telling bare faced lies". Obviously, money "trumps" shame. "Obviously, money "trumps" shame". Always has done here unfortunately neeray, and having moral principles much the same as yours, it grates deeply with me. Having said that I believe these people are without shame, they don't know the meaning of it, because they believe they have a "right" to lie..........they are born with it, they see it, they practise it and include in their belief system. As I said, damn near in their DNA. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
vmack153 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 If a wealthy friend offered to lend you a watch from an expensive collection would you accept? I wouldnt!! That in itself is difficult to believe let alone having 22 of them. Did this "friend" die a natural death? ???? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oziex1 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 This needs to be a major part of the opposing parties campaigns. He is a crook, give it to him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ossy Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 (edited) 11 minutes ago, vmack153 said: If a wealthy friend offered to lend you a watch from an expensive collection would you accept? I wouldnt!! That in itself is difficult to believe let alone having 22 of them. Did this "friend" die a natural death? ???? And the NACC is supposed to be the country's guard against corruption. This 'Factor 22' as good as defines their corruption, too. And the TAT is wondering why its stats aren't too rosy, lately - they must be wanting Prawit and his bull-terrier down the road more than we do - since who the hell would chose to visit a country ruled by tyrants who could, if they chose, simply pull the Swampy shutters down . . . just to put that smile on Porky's face again. Edited December 28, 2018 by Ossy clarity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ulic Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 Was there ever any doubt. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chongalulu Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 5 hours ago, pacovl46 said: How could borrowing a watch be possibly illegal??? Yes,especially when it’s "second hand'..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baerboxer Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 4 hours ago, Emdog said: NACC finds Prawit innocent correct legal term is "not guilty", meaning insufficient evidence etc not provided to establish law was broken and/or snowballs chance in heck they would find him guilty I imagine many of us had thought we were "loaning" to Thai only to find out later we were "gifting" Your last sentence rings true. "Loans" to family (extended), friends or colleagues here seems to mean the same as 'gift". When pressed to repay a business loan my S-i-L reaction was "oh you are so poor now are you"? No thought of ever having to pay/give back. But if they have, as they've said, obtained all the warranty cards, original purchase information, and checked with Customs if any were directly imported; and located all but one watch, then they would have all the information and evidence to show who bought the watches, when, and from where. But that won't be made public. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tingtong Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 must be a shocking surprise...NOT! does he chair the committee, or it is one of his buddy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubon farang Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 What can you say? The man is innocent He should go to the temple and say a prayer for the friend who gave him the watches 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rossco1 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 cant work out why people are surprised my blind dog seen this outcome 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oziex1 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 9 minutes ago, rossco1 said: cant work out why people are surprised my blind dog seen this outcome Haven't read a post on this thread voicing any surprise. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Oziex1 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 2 hours ago, neeray said: "no sense of shame in telling bare faced lies" This is the part that always gets me. I was raised to possess a sense of shame. Conversely speaking, I was raised to be proud. Getting caught in a bold faced lie is shameful. Stealing from the very people that you represent is shameful. Let's suppose that a "group" representing a people bought some submarines. For making that purchase, the group was given a million dollar gift, perhaps some expensive watches. Without that gift, these submarines could have been bought for a million dollars less, in my simple way of thinking. Thus, "the people" now must pay a million dollars more, even more with long term interest. But then the "group" got caught and "the group" showed "no sense of shame in telling bare faced lies". Obviously, money "trumps" shame. Yeah, but when issues of this nature are pushed harder, from an elected opposite political party for example. The perp will squirm deny run away maybe get a thug to use violence against their accusers. So what does it mean? Is it a reaction to their guilt or a reaction to being shamed? Face, so juvenile. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
khunPer Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 9 hours ago, Prairieboy said: Just call me Nostradamus! Did "we" expect anything else...???? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mavideol Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 NACC finds Prawit innocent... Hence he was not guilty of concealing his assets... surprise would have been if they found him guilty!!!!! that would have made the front page!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
meinphuket Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 555555555555555555555555555555.....Where some are more equal than others.....it would be funny if it wasn't so sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sambum Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 I can categorically state that I have NEVER heard of anyone borrowing a watch from a friend, and someone of Prawit's obvious wealth must have a couple of his own watches in his possession? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mavideol Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 14 minutes ago, sambum said: I can categorically state that I have NEVER heard of anyone borrowing a watch from a friend, and someone of Prawit's obvious wealth must have a couple of his own watches in his possession? never a slightly doubt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tracker1 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 21 hours ago, bangrak said: For your info, the 'other paper' names him as a certain 'Patthawat Suksriwrong'. Does the name ring a bell for anyone, as having studied at St Gabriel's College together with the frog, and wealthy enough to have like a million USD. of watches, ...to lend out to 'good' friends...? I take it he is deceased with no living relatives to be given the watches back also ! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dpspike Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 Was there any doubt that he wouldn't be found essentially spotless? They got their image to maintain..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Burma Bill Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 Is this a "wind up"?? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacovl46 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 11 hours ago, baboon said: I can read the article for myself, thanks. I asked if you believe him. Do you? And I said it’s beside the point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baboon Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 19 minutes ago, pacovl46 said: And I said it’s beside the point. That's a 'No', then. The same as the rest of us. Therefore your previous query is rhetorical at best. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chama Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 Not that they had any previously but any credibility the NACC may have had is now gone...but the envelopes were fat and the trough beckoned. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Huayrat Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 On 12/27/2018 at 7:24 PM, z42 said: The NACC think by pulling this outrageous BS stunt that they've pacified the issue, I think that WHEN this whole business is actually proved to be a cover up (that no rational person could argue) that some serious repurcussions will ensue. Eradication of corruption efforts under the NACC from here on in (under any circumstances / on any sides) will have absolutely no merit whatsoever. They've completely shattered whatever reputation they might have had after this. It's just so pathetic and wrong. Utterly shameful Who do you think controls the NACC.. They do as they are told by his mate the man at the Top.. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dallen52 Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 Well I never saw that coming. Yeh right.. TIT. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jonmarleesco Posted December 28, 2018 Share Posted December 28, 2018 'Anti-corruption watchdog finds luxury Timepieces were borrowed from now deceased friend, sniffs no graft.' I seriously doubt they could sniff a rotting corpse. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pacovl46 Posted December 29, 2018 Share Posted December 29, 2018 12 hours ago, baboon said: That's a 'No', then. The same as the rest of us. Therefore your previous query is rhetorical at best. Really? I mean really?! Ok, let me makes this perfectly clear then. Borrowing something from someone with their consent is in my opinion absolutely legal. The only question I’m still having, and I know I’m repeating myself now, is how it could possibly be illegal! Forget about wether the story is true or not and wether I believe the guy, which I actually do, because it is absolutely irrelevant to my question! I would’ve asked the same thing if it had been about something completely different. So, if you can answer that question then please reply, if you can’t then please stop wasting my time, and most of it all - don’t put words in my mouth! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pieeyed Posted December 29, 2018 Share Posted December 29, 2018 No surprises here. Sent from my SM-J730GM using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now