Jump to content

Navy ships out for Chinese war games


Rimmer

Recommended Posts

Navy ships out for Chinese war games

image.png

SATTAHIP:--The Royal Thai Navy dispatched its contingent for Blue Strike, the large-scale joint exercise with China.

 

Rear Adm. Paisan Meesri, commander of Frigate Squadron 1, inspected the troops April 26 before they were dispatched to Zhanjiang, China for the May 2-8 war games, which alternate between Thai and Chinese waters.

 

The HTMS Naresuan and HTMS Bangpakong with 410 marines and sailors will participate.

 

The Blue Strike drill is the naval counterpart to the Falcon Strike drill held between the two countries’ air forces.

 

-- PATTAYA MAIL 2019-04-28--

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Rimmer said:

The Blue Strike drill is the naval counterpart to the Falcon Strike drill held between the two countries’ air forces.

They do like to strike up a catchy name no .? if there were an Army version would it be known as Disaster Strikes .. 

Just askin' ..

 

Edited by Justgrazing
Sp
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, davehowden said:

HTMS Bangpakong: Flower class corvette, built UK 1943.

A museum piece.

 

 HTMS Naresuan: Built China 1994. 

The Thai Navy complained of the poor quality of the ships. The ship's damage control system was very limited, with very basic fire suppression systems. It was claimed that if the ship's hull was breached, the ship would be quickly lost to flooding. The Thai Navy had to spend considerable time and effort to correct some of these issues

 

The current HTMS Bangpakong was built in 1991 (China) specifically for export to Thailand:

 

"The Royal Thai Navy received four new Type 053Ts (based on the then-latest Type 053H2) in the early-1990s. Each cost ฿2 billion."

 

It's the one on the right:

 

The Royal Thai Navy frigate HTMS Bangpakong (FFG 456) is underway alongside the guided-missile destroyer USS Higgins

image.png.6b6906016c866f527a8e15d81833257a.png

 

The one you quote was struck off years ago.

 

 

 

Edited by Enoon
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Enoon said:

 

The current HTMS Bangpakong was built in 1991 (China) specifically for export to Thailand:

 

"The Royal Thai Navy received four new Type 053Ts (based on the then-latest Type 053H2) in the early-1990s. Each cost ฿2 billion."

 

It's the one on the right:

image.png.6b6906016c866f527a8e15d81833257a.png

 

The one you quote was struck off years ago.

 

 

 

My error, apologies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

59 minutes ago, henry15 said:

It they are sensible the join the Chinese forces.

Can you explain WHY???? is this coming from somebody just showing dislike for one side or is there really a reason why Thailand would be better off choosing China's side.... I'm really curious for facts, or statistics........

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, mikebell said:

'"In the land off the blind the man with one eye is king." Desiderius Erasmus Roterodamus - In the land of the Thai, the man with the biggest gun is king.

No you mean the one with the most money 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, nervona81732 said:

This is a big red flag for Thailand. Soon they will be calling this place ( Thailand ) Chiland. The communist structure of China is a CANCER.

 

Interesting. Do tell us why?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Rimmer said:

The HTMS Naresuan and HTMS Bangpakong with 410 marines and sailors will participate.

Versus 2018 U.S. Cobra Gold military exercises with over 4,000 Thai troops involved.

There was recently the 2019 Gold Cobra exercises but I couldn't find any mention of the number of Thai troops involved.

In any case participation of 410 Thai military appears to be "lip service" to meet Thailand's obligations with its security agreement with China following the military coup in Thailand.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, nervona81732 said:

This is a big red flag for Thailand. Soon they will be calling this place ( Thailand ) Chiland. The communist structure of China is a CANCER.

 

Tell that to the world economy yuck yuck yuck ????????????

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, VocalNeal said:

image.png.6b6906016c866f527a8e15d8183325

 

Do we assume the Thai vessel is the one with the injector pressure turned up?

Hahaha super subtle there VN .. What's missing are multi funnels like those exhausts you see hanging out the back of the trucks and buses here and a turbo dump valving phssst'ing off the overboost when they give it full speed ahead .. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, TheHangingJudge said:

Thailand would do what they did in ww2 fold to whichever country decided to invade.

Thailand invaded Burma and won during WWII.  Thailand invaded and won against France (sort of) during WWII.  Thailand had a deal with Japan and were Japan's only voluntary ally during WWII.  Thailand surrendered to the Allies and were occupied by the British and Indian armies in 1946. 

Edited by marcusarelus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Kim J said:

The French are actually well documented in history for their great abilities in collusion and capitulation as indeed are Thailand. Add that to the fact that this Franco - Thai war went on whilst mainland France was occupied by Nazi Germany rendering the French military forces even more ineffective than their own natural limitations allowed for.

Thailand throughout history have been one of the most ineffective military forces in the World and have achieved little of significance despite their quite large numbers. All they did in this Franco Thai war was to take advantage of a situation when they knew full well there could only be a token resistance, a complete hollow victory, that indeed achieved virtually nothing some might say.

Ultimately I would think no serious modern military force would wish to do anything alongside the Thai's other than a repeat of history to use their territory for strategic advantage.

Casualties Franco Thai war, France - Total: 732  Thailand - 418. 

 

They also fought bravely during the Vietnam war suffering 350 killed and 1300 wounded. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Kim J said:

Of course in the Franco Thai war, Thailand came out of it the better. As I pointed out it was deliberately done at a time when the French were severely limited in their ability to defend themselves, the outcome was almost a foregone conclusion. That is of course the Thai way when it comes to any type of conflict, they will never enter into anything if there is a chance they might lose.

With regard to statistics, if you are going to quote them please at least do so with a modicum of accuracy. Here is a link to some basic information,(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Franco-Thai_War) there is loads more in depth and more detailed sources you can also find if you wish to look. Also as I said, ultimately virtually nothing was achieved for Thailand from this battle despite the continued pride over the 'victory'. The main beneficiaries of the conflict were the Japanese, who were not even involved in any fighting and consequently had no casualties at all!!

 

With regard to the Vietnam war they were just a token force, and I find it quite bizarre that you seem to be heaping praise onto any military force by way of the numbers that they lost!!

It is difficult to discuss without changing the topic.  You might want to read about it or ask someone who was there while we are still alive.  Ask about 4,000 US Special Forces-trained Thai "Tiger Soldiers" (Tahan Sua Pran) and Border Patrol Police Aerial Reinforcement Unit and "the King's own" guys with the small piece of gold on the back side of the Buddhas they wore around their necks at places like Ban Na, the Plain of Jars and Skyline Ridge.  They were in no way described as a token.  The Thai BC 609 almost entirely wiped out and called in artillery on their own position.  I was on the outside in a support role but those guys fought well and among the bravest troops I'd ever seen. 



 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.









×
×
  • Create New...