Jump to content

Mass UK protest demanding second EU referendum planned days before Brexit


webfact

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 181
  • Created
  • Last Reply
9 minutes ago, nauseus said:

We know the EU are playing a game. That's why we want out.

You're full of hyperbole yet short on facts. What game is the EU playing and how is it that 600 mil people need 60 mil people more than the other way around?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bomber said:

So it seems your enjoying brexit then,shame your enjoying something that hasnt happenrd and wont happen,in my book thats called a dream,the will of the sovereign govt is holding firm,no EU interference whatsoever,just what you wanted.

Yes.. A truly fascist action - hope the politicians are happy when they’re unemployed because their constituents are so ashamed of them - 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Becker said:

Because they still hold out hope for you despite the Brexit idiocy. After all, about 50% of the country is not bonkers.

About??? hahaha thats not enough to win a vote ????????????????????

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Becker said:

You're full of hyperbole yet short on facts. What game is the EU playing and how is it that 600 mil people need 60 mil people more than the other way around?

 

Because the 60 million provide financial support for the bulk of the 600 million...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Becker said:

That's not a try, it's game, set and match.

not at all - second referendum NOT agreed if it was there’s no guarantee remoan would win - after all they lost the first one…what then best of five? Remoaners are pathetic!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, bizboi said:

not at all - second referendum NOT agreed if it was there’s no guarantee leave would win - after all they lost the first…what then best of five? Remoaners are pathetic!!

 

Less pathetic than your grammar.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Becker said:

You're full of hyperbole yet short on facts. What game is the EU playing and how is it that 600 mil people need 60 mil people more than the other way around?

Not hyperbole. I mean what I say. If you had looked at the Brexit threads on here and my posts for the last 3 years you might not make such noise. I did not say 600 mil people need 60 mil people more than the other way around.

 

The EU has carefully changed its treaties and arrangements over time so that the UK has steadily lost influence within this rats maze. Almost all of our vetoes have disappeared - we have lost more than 40. The UK is often outvoted by other EU members so that we do not have any true control on our own laws and taxes. Any rebates are to disappear soon. Now, QMV means that we can be subjected to directives and regulations that we don't want at all but are helpless to stop. The UK has had success with the ECJ in less than 30% of cases that it is concerned with. Almost all control of our affairs has gone.  

 

The "game" now includes this "Withdrawal Agreement"; a treaty so bad for Britain that it must have been composed by the EU, or its agents. In December last, the ECJ (unusually quickly) opened the door for the UK to allow it to unilaterally choose to remain in the EU, just one day before the first parliamentary vote on this ghastly "Withdrawal Agreement". How about that?

 

The EU obviously want us to stay. Most of the EU members presently benefit as being net beneficiaries so they are mainly happy (for the time being). 

 

But the Brexit decision was handed to the British people and the majority favoured leaving, which to me, must be the best course. The EU has been to happy to do the UK down for too long and it shows no sign of reform - rather the reverse - so we should go!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nauseus said:

Not hyperbole. I mean what I say. If you had looked at the Brexit threads on here and my posts for the last 3 years you might not make such noise. I did not say 600 mil people need 60 mil people more than the other way around.

 

The EU has carefully changed its treaties and arrangements over time so that the UK has steadily lost influence within this rats maze. Almost all of our vetoes have disappeared - we have lost more than 40. The UK is often outvoted by other EU members so that we do not have any true control on our own laws and taxes. Any rebates are to disappear soon. Now, QMV means that we can be subjected to directives and regulations that we don't want at all but are helpless to stop. The UK has had success with the ECJ in less than 30% of cases that it is concerned with. Almost all control of our affairs has gone.  

 

The "game" now includes this "Withdrawal Agreement"; a treaty so bad for Britain that it must have been composed by the EU, or its agents. In December last, the ECJ (unusually quickly) opened the door for the UK to allow it to unilaterally choose to remain in the EU, just one day before the first parliamentary vote on this ghastly "Withdrawal Agreement". How about that?

 

The EU obviously want us to stay. Most of the EU members presently benefit as being net beneficiaries so they are mainly happy (for the time being). 

 

But the Brexit decision was handed to the British people and the majority favoured leaving, which to me, must be the best course. The EU has been to happy to do the UK down for too long and it shows no sign of reform - rather the reverse - so we should go!  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HDFegpX5gI

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Best if brexit is dumped in the Thames and the Tory party with it, which will happen in the next election if the PM tries to leave the EU with no deal.

 

And for Brexiteers, tough, the ERG should have passed May's deal through parliament. And if anyone questions the veracity of that deal, all I gotta say is have you read it to make such an accusation?  

 

The best way forward for the PM is to accept the WAG deal, but agree with the EU to alter the political statement as to the best way forward.

 

Doesn't take a genius to resolve the impasse - not that BJ has any idea and would probably only be in a job until October. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, stephenterry said:

Best if brexit is dumped in the Thames and the Tory party with it, which will happen in the next election if the PM tries to leave the EU with no deal.

 

And for Brexiteers, tough, the ERG should have passed May's deal through parliament. And if anyone questions the veracity of that deal, all I gotta say is have you read it to make such an accusation?  

 

The best way forward for the PM is to accept the WAG deal, but agree with the EU to alter the political statement as to the best way forward.

 

Doesn't take a genius to resolve the impasse - not that BJ has any idea and would probably only be in a job until October. 

The veracity of that deal? It's true it stinks if that's what you mean.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, stephenterry said:

Best if brexit is dumped in the Thames and the Tory party with it, which will happen in the next election if the PM tries to leave the EU with no deal.

 

And for Brexiteers, tough, the ERG should have passed May's deal through parliament. And if anyone questions the veracity of that deal, all I gotta say is have you read it to make such an accusation?  

 

The best way forward for the PM is to accept the WAG deal, but agree with the EU to alter the political statement as to the best way forward.

 

Doesn't take a genius to resolve the impasse - not that BJ has any idea and would probably only be in a job until October. 

Best if Brexit is brought forward by Boris. He has only one job, but it's a big one - To get us out and break the EU/Remainers impasse.

Remainers can forget another referendum - it's just not going to happen. They can forget WAG too - that's been kicked out three times already. The Merkel/May Surrender Treaty has caused so much strife in the Tory party, he can set about repairs there after we have left, always assuming there is any Tory Party left.

 

As far as reading the deal, remember it's supposed to be a joint Withdrawal Agreement but the legal small print, published by Brussels, shows what this means. Parliament will be asked to ratify a deal which clearly admits that ‘all references to ‘Member States’ and competent authorities of Member States…shall be read as including the United Kingdom.’ (Article 7). So the UK will be bound by EU laws, at least during a transition period. But this ‘transition period’ can be be made to last forever (Article 132).  And even if a successor deal is agreed, the UK will have signed away other rights for years to come. There's a list of the top 40 horrors lurking in the small print of Theresa May’s Brexit surrender. You can check them if you want.

In summary: The supposed ‘transition period’ could last indefinitely or, more specifically, to an undefined date sometime this century (“up to 31 December 20XX”, Art. 132). So while this Agreement covers what the government is calling Brexit, what we in fact get is: ‘transition’ + extension indefinitely (by however many years we are willing to pay for) + all of those extra years from the ‘plus 8 years’ articles.

Should its transition period end within two years, the UK will still be signed up to clauses keeping us under certain rules (like VAT and ECJ supervision) for a further eight years. Some clauses have, quite literally, a “lifetime” duration (Art.39). If the UK defaults on transition, we go in to the backstop with the Customs Union and, realistically, the single market. We can only leave the transition positively with a deal. But we sign away the money. So the EU has no need to give us a deal, and certainly no incentive to make the one they offered ‘better’ than the backstop. The European Court of Justice remains sovereign, as repeatedly stipulated. Perhaps most damagingly of all, we agree to sign away the rights we would have, under international law, to unilaterally walk away. Again, what follows relates (in most part) for the “transition” period. But the language is consistent with the E.U. imagining that this will be the final deal.

 

 

The very best way forward for Boris is to immediately reject the WAG; stop all contributions; declare UK independence; invite the EU for some future trade talks if they want to come to see us. No genius there and impasse solved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Loiner said:

Best if Brexit is brought forward by Boris. He has only one job, but it's a big one - To get us out and break the EU/Remainers impasse.

Remainers can forget another referendum - it's just not going to happen. They can forget WAG too - that's been kicked out three times already. The Merkel/May Surrender Treaty has caused so much strife in the Tory party, he can set about repairs there after we have left, always assuming there is any Tory Party left.

 

As far as reading the deal, remember it's supposed to be a joint Withdrawal Agreement but the legal small print, published by Brussels, shows what this means. Parliament will be asked to ratify a deal which clearly admits that ‘all references to ‘Member States’ and competent authorities of Member States…shall be read as including the United Kingdom.’ (Article 7). So the UK will be bound by EU laws, at least during a transition period. But this ‘transition period’ can be be made to last forever (Article 132).  And even if a successor deal is agreed, the UK will have signed away other rights for years to come. There's a list of the top 40 horrors lurking in the small print of Theresa May’s Brexit surrender. You can check them if you want.

In summary: The supposed ‘transition period’ could last indefinitely or, more specifically, to an undefined date sometime this century (“up to 31 December 20XX”, Art. 132). So while this Agreement covers what the government is calling Brexit, what we in fact get is: ‘transition’ + extension indefinitely (by however many years we are willing to pay for) + all of those extra years from the ‘plus 8 years’ articles.

Should its transition period end within two years, the UK will still be signed up to clauses keeping us under certain rules (like VAT and ECJ supervision) for a further eight years. Some clauses have, quite literally, a “lifetime” duration (Art.39). If the UK defaults on transition, we go in to the backstop with the Customs Union and, realistically, the single market. We can only leave the transition positively with a deal. But we sign away the money. So the EU has no need to give us a deal, and certainly no incentive to make the one they offered ‘better’ than the backstop. The European Court of Justice remains sovereign, as repeatedly stipulated. Perhaps most damagingly of all, we agree to sign away the rights we would have, under international law, to unilaterally walk away. Again, what follows relates (in most part) for the “transition” period. But the language is consistent with the E.U. imagining that this will be the final deal.

 

 

The very best way forward for Boris is to immediately reject the WAG; stop all contributions; declare UK independence; invite the EU for some <deleted>ture trade talks if they want to come to see us. No genius there and impasse solved.

Well put. Good precis. We can't even fight any of it away from the ECJ if we sign it. Ridiculous.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, malagateddy said:

Best if we walk away asap..but wait..the fascist remainers would throw a massive tantrum...they would still try to overturn the democratic LEAVE vote.


Sent from my SM-G7102 using Thailand Forum - Thaivisa mobile app
 

This clip shows a very polite and intelligent leaver being hassled by a bunch of arrogant and rude remainers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, vogie said:

This clip shows a very polite and intelligent leaver being hassled by a bunch of arrogant and rude remainers.

A bit like a TV Brexit thread...but he was giving it all back at the end.....good on him!

 

Not a milkshake in sight. Probably not allowed on set. CH4 will probably give them out for the next show!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...