UK far-right activist Tommy Robinson convicted in contempt-of-court case

[Thainesss]

So Tommy Robinson is in hot water for reporting on muslim rape gangs and liberals are defending the rapists right to a quiet trial.

 

What a laughingstock. 

[petemoss]

3 minutes ago, Thainesss said:

So Tommy Robinson is in hot water for reporting on muslim rape gangs and liberals are defending the rapists right to a quiet trial.

 

What a laughingstock. 

Doesn't say any of that in the OP. says that he was found guilty of contempt of court for ignoring the judge's ruling on reporting restrictions. The restrictions were put in place to prevent the defence claiming a mis-trial. The defendants were subsequently found guilty, recieved long sentences and reporting restrictions were lifted. No thanks to Tommy Islam.

[GroveHillWanderer]

14 minutes ago, Thainesss said:

So Tommy Robinson is in hot water for reporting on muslim rape gangs and liberals are defending the rapists right to a quiet trial.

 

What a laughingstock. 

Did you not read the linked article from the Independent? Because of Yaxley-Lennon's irresponsible and illegal acts, the now-convicted rapists almost got off on a technicality. As the article points out, if the judge had decided to quiz the jurors on whether they were aware of what this person was doing and whether it had influenced them at all, he might have had to declare a mistrial or even dismiss the charges.

 

If that had happened, these vile criminals could have got away with it, thanks purely to Yaxley-Lennon's recklessness and contempt for the law.

[Chomper Higgot]

27 minutes ago, Thainesss said:

So Tommy Robinson is in hot water for reporting on muslim rape gangs and liberals are defending the rapists right to a quiet trial.

 

What a laughingstock. 

'Liberals' are defending the judge's decision to protect the trial against the risk of collapse.

 

Yaxley Lennon's actions created that risk and the real possibility that these vile rapists might have been freed due to his actions. 

 

The outcome that I and anyone who upholds the law wanted came to pass, these vile rapists were given a fair trial and found guilty. The fact that their trial was fair removes any chance of their release on the basis of not having received a fair trial.

 

Yaxley Lennon was convicted of contempt of court and the judge's swift action against him prevented him providing these vile rapists with an excuse to claim they did not receive a fair trial.

 

Vile rapists and law breaking thug who put their trial at risk locked up. 

 

What's not to like?

 

[yogi100]

2 hours ago, robblok said:

 

 

this guy endangered a case. It could have led to the defendants go free. That is what he risked. I think its good he get convicted for it. Just imagine the outcry if these rapist walked because that stupid idiot.  I am sure he then would have blamed the justice system. Idiots and extremist on both sides are making it hard for the moderates. 

Everything he said had already been made public by the BBC. All he did was read from their article.

 

The establishment have it in for him because he's a member of the WWC and should keep his opinions to himself.

[Chomper Higgot]

6 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

Everything he said had already been made public by the BBC. All he did was read from their article.

 

The establishment have it in for him because he's a member of the WWC and should keep his opinions to himself.

Since when has Yaxley Lennon been associated with the Women's World Cup?

[evadgib]

Some interesting points raised before the verdict was known:

(Content not Poster!)

[Basil B]

3 hours ago, TopDeadSenter said:

OK thanks, good to know. So for example Bradley Manning, who was charged as Bradley Manning and referred to in court as Bradley Manning during his trial, but later prefers to be called Chelsea, can still be called Bradley by haters trying to insult him, and that is OK? After all, how can it possibly be a criminal offence or a 'hate crime' to refer to someone by their actual name?

Manning case was held in American courts, not British. 

[yogi100]

Whenever this subject of Robinson crops up on a Thai forum it's amazing the number of middle aged and elderly British men who queue up to vilify him.

 

I for one wonder what motivates them to attack a fellow who stands up for the victims of the biggest cases of mass paedophilia ever to hit Britain.

 

There is something revoltingly vile about men interfering with our young girls and also something just as disgusting about those who castigate someone like Robinson for bringing it to the public's attention.

[Basil B]

As his previous conviction was overturned on "procedural failings" I would like to think the sentence will be the 13 months less time already served.

 

The fact that he will almost certainly end up serving it in solitary confinement is a result of his own behaviour.

 

[OneMoreFarang]

35 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

Whenever this subject of Robinson crops up on a Thai forum it's amazing the number of middle aged and elderly British men who queue up to vilify him.

 

I for one wonder what motivates them to attack a fellow who stands up for the victims of the biggest cases of mass paedophilia ever to hit Britain.

 

There is something revoltingly vile about men interfering with our young girls and also something just as disgusting about those who castigate someone like Robinson for bringing it to the public's attention.

Hitler built the Autobahn. Should we thank him for that? Or are there maybe other aspects of his life which are questionable?

Same same… 

[stevenl]

37 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

Whenever this subject of Robinson crops up on a Thai forum it's amazing the number of middle aged and elderly British men who queue up to vilify him.

 

I for one wonder what motivates them to attack a fellow who stands up for the victims of the biggest cases of mass paedophilia ever to hit Britain.

 

There is something revoltingly vile about men interfering with our young girls and also something just as disgusting about those who castigate someone like Robinson for bringing it to the public's attention.

Please read about his trial, and you'll see that your post doesn't make any sense.

I'm glad to see though many middle aged and elderly British men stand up to racism.

[DoctorG]

9 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Please read about his trial, and you'll see that your post doesn't make any sense.

I'm glad to see though many middle aged and elderly British men stand up to racism.

Exactly what racism is involved here?

[Chomper Higgot]

53 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

Whenever this subject of Robinson crops up on a Thai forum it's amazing the number of middle aged and elderly British men who queue up to vilify him.

 

I for one wonder what motivates them to attack a fellow who stands up for the victims of the biggest cases of mass paedophilia ever to hit Britain.

 

There is something revoltingly vile about men interfering with our young girls and also something just as disgusting about those who castigate someone like Robinson for bringing it to the public's attention.

Go through this thread and pick out anyone vilifying Yaxley Lennon for anything other than putting the trial of these vile rapists at risk and thereby risking these vile rapists being released. 

[GroveHillWanderer]

1 hour ago, yogi100 said:

Everything he said had already been made public by the BBC. All he did was read from their article.

Again, that was part of the problem. Some of the things reported by the BBC, were earlier allegations that were not part of the court case. Also, there was no suggestion that the jurors were aware of the BBC article, which had been published some time ago and before the judge imposed reporting restrictions, whereas at least one juror had said they were aware of Yaxley-Lennon's activities.

 

Whether this juror or any others were aware of exactly what what was in the video is not clear, as the judge decided not to ask them about it.

 

However the lawyers for the accused actually filed a motion to discharge the jury, based specifically on Yaxley-Lennon's live streaming from outside the court. This would have led to a mistrial, or possibly even the charges being dropped altogether.

 

As the Independent article stated:

 

Quote

Lawyers defending members of the gang then argued it was “inconceivable” that jurors had not seen Robinson’s live stream, which would prejudice them against their clients.

From the defence lawyers' submissions, it's clear that it was the live streaming with its attendant high level of publicity (and not the BBC article, for instance) that had directly jeopardized the outcome of the trial.

Edited July 6, 2019 by GroveHillWanderer

[TopDeadSenter]

4 hours ago, stevenl said:

His 'reporting' made a mistrial a very real possibility. This conviction has nothing, absolutely nothing, to do with the child abuse case, only with him willfully ignoring a court order and risking the perpetrators getting released due to his actions.

 Not true. They were only gathered for the verdict reading. Luckily the whole livestream from start to finish is still up on Youtube. I would like to invite all those stating that his actions could have caused the trial to collapse to watch the whole thing. He is overly cautious not to say anything about the case details. The only law breaking I see are when the defendants threaten and shout abuse at Tommy Robinson's mother. 

 

 easy to find, just search for "The Stream That Got Tommy Robinson Arrested - Muslim Grooming Gang Court Trial" in the youtube search.

Edited July 6, 2019 by TopDeadSenter

[yogi100]

30 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Go through this thread and pick out anyone vilifying Yaxley Lennon for anything other than putting the trial of these vile rapists at risk and thereby risking these vile rapists being released. 

He did not put it at risk. He was outside the court premises while the case was going on inside the court.

[Chomper Higgot]

12 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

 Not true. They were only gathered for the verdict reading. Luckily the whole livestream from start to finish is still up on Youtube. I would like to invite all those stating that his actions could have caused the trial to collapse to watch the whole thing. He is overly cautious not to say anything about the case details. The only law breaking I see are when the defendants threaten and shout abuse at Tommy Robinson's mother. 

 

 easy to find, just search for "The Stream That Got Tommy Robinson Arrested - Muslim Grooming Gang Court Trial" in the youtube search.

It's not us that Yaxley Lennon needed to convince, it was the judge, and he failed to do so. 

 

The judge's swift action protected the trial of these vile rapists who have now been convicted, along with the man who put their trial at risk and in doing so risked these vile rapists being released without punishment. 

 

Put your name amongst those pleased that the judge acted to protect the trial and ensure these vile rapists have been securely sentenced for their heinous crimes. 

[stevenl]

13 minutes ago, TopDeadSenter said:

 Not true. They were only gathered for the verdict reading. Luckily the whole livestream from start to finish is still up on Youtube. I would like to invite all those stating that his actions could have caused the trial to collapse to watch the whole thing. He is overly cautious not to say anything about the case details. The only law breaking I see are when the defendants threaten and shout abuse at Tommy Robinson's mother. 

 

 easy to find, just search for "The Stream That Got Tommy Robinson Arrested - Muslim Grooming Gang Court Trial" in the youtube search.

Very much true.

 

From the post before yours:

"However the lawyers for the accused actually filed a motion to discharge the jury, based specifically on Yaxley-Lennon's live streaming from outside the court. This would have led to a mistrial, or possibly even the charges being dropped altogether.

 

As the Independent article stated:

 

Quote

Lawyers defending members of the gang then argued it was “inconceivable” that jurors had not seen Robinson’s live stream, which would prejudice them against their clients.

From the defence lawyers' submissions, it's clear that it was the live streaming with its attendant high level of publicity (and not the BBC article, for instance) that had directly jeopardized the outcome of the trial."

[Chomper Higgot]

Just now, yogi100 said:

He did not put it at risk. He was outside the court premises while the case was going on inside the court.

The judge disagreed, the defence lawyers of these vile rapists obviously disagreed when they filed for a mistrial on the basis of Yaxley Lennon's behaviour. 

 

You meanwhile produce no evidence to backup your claim. 

 

 

[yogi100]

49 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Please read about his trial, and you'll see that your post doesn't make any sense.

I'm glad to see though many middle aged and elderly British men stand up to racism..

 

"I'm glad to see though many middle aged and elderly British men stand up to racism.'t make any sense."

 

It's a shame they don't have the guts to stand up to racism when it was displayed against underage white English girls by the rape gangs. Who incidentally admitted they targeted white English children because of their race.

[petemoss]

2 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

 

"I'm glad to see though many middle aged and elderly British men stand up to racism.'t make any sense."

 

It's a shame they don't have the guts to stand up to racism when it was displayed against underage white English girls by the rape gangs. Who incidentally admitted they targeted white English children because of their race.

Tommy Islam didn't stand up for them either. He only blogged about perps that had already been arrested and charged. He did this to make money on his YouTube channel. Profiteering from the victims of gang rape, as vile as the perps themselves.

[stevenl]

6 minutes ago, yogi100 said:

 

"I'm glad to see though many middle aged and elderly British men stand up to racism.'t make any sense."

 

It's a shame they don't have the guts to stand up to racism when it was displayed against underage white English girls by the rape gangs. Who incidentally admitted they targeted white English children because of their race.

They did, hence the conviction.

 

BTW, quoting is easy, just press 'quote', no reason to adjust the text and make mistakes.

[yogi100]

9 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The judge disagreed, the defence lawyers of these vile rapists obviously disagreed when they filed for a mistrial on the basis of Yaxley Lennon's behaviour. 

 

You meanwhile produce no evidence to backup your claim. 

 

 

What evidence do you expect to be produced apart from the fact that the previous judge ordered his release within minutes of the legal presentations being made in court.

 

It makes me wonder what goes through the minds of grown men when they criticise a person for bringing such disgusting matters to the attention of the public.

[stevenl]

3 minutes ago, petemoss said:

Tommy Islam didn't stand up for them either. He only blogged about perps that had already been arrested and charged. He did this to make money on his YouTube channel. Profiteering from the victims of gang rape, as vile as the perps themselves.

And at the same time risking their conviction.

[yogi100]

2 minutes ago, petemoss said:

Tommy Islam didn't stand up for them either. He only blogged about perps that had already been arrested and charged. He did this to make money on his YouTube channel. Profiteering from the victims of gang rape, as vile as the perps themselves.

How did he profiteer from it and how would his doing so make him as 'vile as the perps themselves.'

[Sujo]

Im surprised to hear middle aged and elderly men on this forum complaining when someone broke the law is arrested

[yogi100]

1 minute ago, stevenl said:

And at the same time risking their conviction.

How did his reading from a BBC report that had already been made public risk their conviction.

 

He was not even on court premises. No one in the court could hear what he was saying. He was talking into a mobile phone not into a megaphone.

[Orton Rd]

Don't forget they jailed chartists., trade unionists and suffragettes in the past, as well as killing people the establishment wanted rid of, this is a reasonable review

 

 

 

[petemoss]

4 minutes ago, Orton Rd said:

Don't forget they jailed chartists., trade unionists and suffragettes in the past, as well as killing people the establishment wanted rid of, this is a reasonable review

 

 

 

Had to laugh at his Euro Election results. Got slaughtered. Obviously not as populist as he thinks he is. 2% of the vote. 555

 

Little big head who thinks with his little head because his big head's broke.

Edited July 6, 2019 by petemoss