Jump to content

No-deal Brexit would be tragedy, EU will stick to agreement: Timmermans


snoop1130

Recommended Posts

No-deal Brexit would be tragedy, EU will stick to agreement: Timmermans

By Gabriela Baczynska

 

jhkuij.JPG

FILE PHOTO - European Commission First Vice-President Frans Timmermans addresses a news conference during a European Union's General Affairs Council in Brussels, Belgium, February 27, 2018. REUTERS/Francois Lenoir/File Photo

 

BRUSSELS (Reuters) - A no-deal Brexit would be a tragedy for both the EU and Britain but the bloc will stick to its withdrawal agreement with London, a deputy head of the European Commission said on Tuesday.

 

Frans Timmermans was speaking as Boris Johnson was named leader of Britain’s governing Conservative Party. He will take over from Theresa May as prime minister on Wednesday.

 

Johnson, a leader of the Brexit campaign before the 2016 EU membership referendum, has repeatedly expressed his intention to either renegotiate the stalled divorce agreement with the bloc or leave without a deal by Oct. 31.

 

“A no-deal Brexit, a hard Brexit, would be a tragedy - for all sides, not just for the United Kingdom,” Timmermans told a news conference. “We are all going to suffer if that happens.”

 

“The United Kingdom reached an agreement with the European Union and the European Union will stick to that agreement,” Timmermans said. “We will hear what the new prime minister has to say when he comes to Brussels... This is the best deal possible.”

 

The EU is bracing for a no-deal Brexit, or another delay to Britain’s departure, should Johnson follow through on his promises as Britain’s leader.

 

A colleague of Timmermans at the EU’s executive Commission, which negotiates Brexit for the 27 remaining member states, published a column on Tuesday, lashing out at Johnson’s “cheap promises, simplified visions, blatantly evident incorrect statements” about the EU.

 

The Lithuanian commissioner responsible for health and food safety in the EU, Vytenis Andriukaitis, made a link between Johnson’s Brexit campaign and Soviet-era fact distortion.

 

“I care when democracy is taken hostage and used as a pawn in political games,” said Andriukaitis, who was born and lived for decades in the Soviet Union, which collapsed in 1991. “I will be present to actively defend the EU.”

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-07-23
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hopefully Britains Trump will be one of the shortest serving UK pm's on record.

Unfortunately he will not have the balls to go to the country on a deal, no deal ,remain referendum and the hurt will continue.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, kamahele said:

I don't think the EU wants the UK to stay in for the contribution only. The UK has benefited hugely from being in the EU, something that BREXIT supporters seem to forget. The deal has been good for Europe as a whole and the UK.

But we have nowhere to house them....????

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, cleopatra2 said:

The UK representative signed the deal.

I doubt anyone had the authority to sign any deal on behalf of the UK without it being ratified by parliament.

It's a bit like sex, you can say 'no' at any time, and it's all off.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

You think Theresa May was representing the UK?

 

Besides, Parliament has to ratify it and they won't. It's dead, thankfully.

That is the key

For Parliament to vote it down a deal must have been agreed.

 

See CRaG legislation

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

You’re right, same as I doubt anyone had the authority to declare an advisory referendum binding on behalf of the UK without changing the constitution. 

 

 

Absolutely correct. Cameron tried to pretend the referendum was legally binding, no full well it could never be. May sought to cheat parliament and implement it by executive decision illegally using the Royal Prerogative. 

 

History shouldn't, quite rightly, treat either well.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Absolutely correct. Cameron tried to pretend the referendum was legally binding, no full well it could never be. May sought to cheat parliament and implement it by executive decision illegally using the Royal Prerogative. 

 

History shouldn't, quite rightly, treat either well.

Not so fast Tonto, the UK doesn't have a codified constitution, it has an unwritten constitution which means by parliament being sovereign they can change the constitution by an act of parliament.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.










×
×
  • Create New...