Jump to content

U.S. House to launch Trump impeachment inquiry over Ukraine controversy


webfact

Recommended Posts

50 minutes ago, roobaa01 said:

as a matter of fact i could not find anything about that bombshell news in the fakenews media cnn, nbc, msnbc, wapo, nytimes only tucker carlson made reference to it on his fox show. surely this bombshell will throw the spanner into the dems impeachment work.

 

wbr

roobaa01

Of course you assume news from this questionable source must be true, since it is telling you stuff you want to believe.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Posts from unapproved sources have been removed along with replies.   Other off-topic, troll posts also removed.   Continuing to post information from questionable sources will earn suspensions as will conspiracy theories.  

 

Just because you found it on the internet doesn't make it credible.  

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, 4675636b596f75 said:

US Government forms have an OMB number, typically.  I wonder if the whistleblower form has one.  There is no way they could have put through changes without getting OMB approval.  Once this comes to light, the Democratic Coup against a President of the United States of America will be clear to more voters.

 

IC IG released a statement addressing your "concerns"...

 

 

https://www.dni.gov/files/ICIG/Documents/News/ICIG News/2019/September 30 - Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints/ICIG Statement on Processing of Whistleblower Complaints.pdf

 

Feel free to avoid reading it.

 

Obfuscate away.

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Note that Sean Hannity's show is technically "entertainment", and not "news", at least according to Fox. 

 

I'll stipulate that, as it airs 9:00 PM, it is not "late-night" - gotta catch the catheter crowd before they nod off. It is pretty funny though.

 

 

 

 

  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Deleted Firsthand Knowledge Requirement For Whistleblowers Implicates Another Federal Agency

 

Looks like more out of the ordinary changes other than the acceptance of 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th hand knowledge were made by a Federal Agency.  And coincidentally it's another change that helps facilitate the whistle blower complaint.

 

As of today there still has not been any explanation as to why the whistle blower complaint form was changed.  Why?  They obviously changed the policy because they had a reason to do so.  All the agency needs to do is to make public that reason.  Putting off a disclosure may mean they don't want that reason to become public.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

BTW, my prediction is that Biden will never make it to the Dem nomination.  You can take that to the bank.

 

 

This is right up there with "the sun will rise tomorrow". Brilliant prediction. Not.

 

I like Joe, and would vote for him, but he is not the strongest candidate. I know the trump campaign was worried about him, but he would have faltered.

 

Next woman up.

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Tippaporn said:

Deleted Firsthand Knowledge Requirement For Whistleblowers Implicates Another Federal Agency

 

Looks like more out of the ordinary changes other than the acceptance of 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th hand knowledge were made by a Federal Agency.  And coincidentally it's another change that helps facilitate the whistle blower complaint.

 

As of today there still has not been any explanation as to why the whistle blower complaint form was changed.  Why?  They obviously changed the policy because they had a reason to do so.  All the agency needs to do is to make public that reason.  Putting off a disclosure may mean they don't want that reason to become public.

 

Hand meet straw.

 

 

You do realize that this flimsy deflection does nothing to address:

 

the memo outlining the call

any first-hand witnesses who will come forward

other calls to MBS, Putin

 

So the form was changed, who cares? The complaint's trek, to the CIA, the WH, DoJ, the IC IG and the DNI and finally Congress and the public, offered many places to be caught and killed. It wasn't

 

You're way out on a limb with that there "argument".

 

 

I'd defend against the charges, that is, the content of the complaint, not the form, but I'm no country lawyer.

 

What next..."OMG, they used the wrong font!!!"

 

 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...