Jump to content



U.S. House to launch Trump impeachment inquiry over Ukraine controversy


webfact

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, RideJocky said:

 


Yes, once it came out that the ruled were changed such that the could expedite the “whistle blower’s” second-hand report they had to scramble...
 

 

You also missed that boat. Debunked already. Keep up with the news.

"THE FACTS: They're wrong on multiple fronts. There was nothing improper in the submission of the whistleblower complaint. No whistleblower law was changed and nothing under that law requires the complaints to have first-hand information"

https://fortune.com/2019/10/01/whistleblower-rules-changed-laws/

  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tippaporn said:

I would argue that the Fortune article is pure garbage.  A very, very short, condensed article and doesn't touch on any of the facts which have been circulating for quite some time now in the public.  Since it so short it does not go into any depth whatsoever to counter with specifics any of the reports claiming otherwise.  Simply a "this is what we say and you can trust us" piece.

Still more facts than that post of yours I responded to earlier.  See how that works? 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jack100 said:

I fear for my media stock prices  if Trump leaves the scene ...who  can  ever replace him?

That sounds like a 45 fear talking point. A la I alone can fix it. If I lose, everything will crash. Be afraid of not having 45 in charge. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Oh dear. We know that Trump lies, cheats on his wife etc etc etc, and guess what? it doesn't change anything. We've always known. The Dems should have stuck with Bernie and he'd be president right now.

Given the choice, it's not surprising Trump won. Best option of two bad choices.

Back to "But, but, but...Hillary!"

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, rabas said:

 

Nothing changed, same same, said the deep MSM. But as reported by a Canadian environmental consultant outside msm land, the govenment's real online form was changed on September 25 right after the story broke. Why? So I downloaded that version, now in a safe place in Thailand, wrapped in foil wiped with hot chilli peppers. Here it is......... created on the Sept 24th and last modified on the Sept 25.  CNN fact (cough) checkers didn't mention that. Adobe PDF files are fully secure, which is why the US government uses them.

 

whistleblower.jpg.a94c25d06304ea77127826e8e51279d0.jpg

 

 

whistleblower2.jpg

I just downloaded it and get the same dates. In case it has any importance (the law did not change, anyway; most of the statements have already been proven true) it would raise the following questions:

- what has been exactly modified?

- how was the form on August 12?

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.