Jump to content

Giuliani says Trump did not pay for his globetrotting push for Biden probe


Recommended Posts

Posted

Giuliani says Trump did not pay for his globetrotting push for Biden probe

By Karen Freifeld

 

2019-09-29T223750Z_1_LYNXMPEF8S0VG_RTROPTP_4_USA-ELECTION-TRUMP.JPG

FILE PHOTO: Donald Trump speaks with former New York mayor Rudy Giuliani as he visits Gettysburg National Military Park, in Gettysburg, Pennsylvania, U.S. October 22, 2016. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

 

NEW YORK (Reuters) - Rudy Giuliani, President Donald Trump's personal attorney, says he met Ukrainian officials in Madrid, Paris and Warsaw this year as he pushed an investigation into one of Trump's main political rivals in the 2020 presidential election, former Vice President Joe Biden.

 

Giuliani has emerged as a central figure in a scandal that has now engulfed Trump and left him facing an impeachment inquiry into whether he misused his office for his own political gains.

 

One of the key questions is who financed Giuliani's globe-trotting as he pursued unsubstantiated allegations that Biden had tried to fire Ukraine's then chief prosecutor, Viktor Shokin, to stop him investigating an energy company on which his son Hunter served as a director.

 

"Nobody pays my expenses," Giuliani said in an interview with Reuters on Friday. "What does it matter if I'm getting paid for it. Isn't the real story whether he (Biden) sold out the vice presidency of the United States, not whether I got paid for it?"

 

Reuters was not able to independently verify how Giuliani paid for his trips.

 

Biden has accused Giuliani of peddling "false, debunked conspiracy theories."

 

Giuliani traveled to Madrid to meet Andriy Yermak, a top adviser to Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy, a few days after a July 25 phone call in which Trump pressed Zelinskiy to investigate Biden. Yermak had sought the meeting with Giuliani.

 

Giuliani said that he chose Madrid as the meeting place because he was going to be there anyway on behalf of two clients, whom he declined to name.

 

"We were negotiating where to meet. He was going to come to New York. I said Mr. Yermak, I'm going to Madrid for four days, five days. Would it be easier if I met you there? He said yes, so those expenses were paid by I assume one client. Since I took two days off I think I paid some of that personally as well."

 

Giuliani did not say what they discussed at that meeting, but a whistleblower complaint about Trump's call with Zelinksiy made public last week said U.S. officials had characterized the meeting as a "direct follow-up" to the president's call.Giuliani said he had received no money from Trump's election campaign or the Republican National Committee, the bureaucratic body that oversees Trump's Republican Party.

 

He said he did not view his work as a "political act."

 

"This began almost a year ago, two years before any election, when I heard the allegations about Joe Biden I did not think about them as connected to the 2020 election. At that point he wasn't even a candidate."

 

Giuliani said he met a Ukrainian prosecutor in Paris in April or May for further discussions about the firing of Shokin. He added that he had been in the French capital "for other reasons once again."

 

Giuliani said he met Shokin's replacement, Yuriy Lutsenko, in Warsaw in February after first meeting him in New York in January. Giuliani said the meeting with Lutsenko in Warsaw was "really social." "I think it was either dinner or cigars after dinner. Not opportune for substantive discussion," he said. 

 

(Reporting by Karen Freifeld; Editing by Ross Colvin and Daniel Wallis)

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-09-30
 
  • Haha 1
Posted

Keep digging Rudy ya dumb smuck lol what a (sdeleated) administration trump is actually asking us to give up our sovereignty to get his sorry ass re elected they are doing a great job for the russan federation imo kick the bum out!

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, webfact said:

Nobody pays my expenses," Giuliani said in an interview with Reuters on Friday. "What does it matter if I'm getting paid for it.

Not familiar with Giuliani. Is he a comedian that come out with funny line like 'truth is not truth' and now this gem of contradicting himself in one sentence. 

Posted
3 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Biden and the Democrats are <deleted> scared of what Giuliani is uncovering! 

Go, Rudy! ???? 

 

MAGA

I sure hope rudy has registered as a foreign agent.

  • Haha 2
Posted
4 hours ago, Boon Mee said:

Biden and the Democrats are <deleted> scared of what Giuliani is uncovering! 

Go, Rudy! ???? 

 

MAGA

I suggest you read the facts. Listening to Giuliani, I really can't understand how an intelligent person blatantly lies about documented facts, like the Bidens taking millions of $ from Ukraine, or from China. The facts are that Biden Jr. had a salary of $50,000 for two years from a Ukrainian energy company, against which corruption charges were made and investigated and the case closed by a Prosecutor months before he was sacked due to pressure from US authorities, represented by the then VP Biden and other western countries, including Germany, France and the UK. Have they all been bribed by Biden?

  • Like 1
Posted
28 minutes ago, Mac98 said:

"No experience in the field." What a laugh. Who in Trump's Cabinet has any experience in the field? Carson slices brains and he's in charge of Housing. De Voss is a rich nincompoop and put in charge of Education. And the ones that have had any contact with their charge, it was to destroy it: Environment; national parks; workplace safety; health care.

 

 

Son-in-Law. Daughter.

Them glass houses.

  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Again the facts.

 

Burisma was investigated prior to Hunter Biden starting work.

 

the investigation stopped and was dormant.

 

Ukraine govt asked for US help to get rid of the prosecutor because he was corrupt. Most western govts wanted him gone.

 

What biden did was in accordance with official govt policy, at the directive of the president, and was done publicly.

 

After the removal of the corrupt prosecutor the new one reopened the investigation and found nothing.

 

Trump, on the other hand asked a foreign govt to investigate a US citizen who is a political rival. He did so in secret.

That's not what the fired prosecutor says. He says he refused to stop investigating Burisma.

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, canuckamuck said:

There are documents released that include the statements from the prosecutor who was fired on Biden's demand that he was indeed investigating Burisma. Official transcripts in his own words. Here is a link to Tim Pool's take on it. He shows the documents. Of course you won't watch it.

 

These so called "documents" - the statement of the sacked prosecutor  - are being contradicted by facts. The statement may or may not be fake, but it is simply untrue and contradicted by actual undispotable facts.

  • Thanks 2
Posted
36 minutes ago, Mac98 said:

"No experience in the field." What a laugh. Who in Trump's Cabinet has any experience in the field? Carson slices brains and he's in charge of Housing. De Voss is a rich nincompoop and put in charge of Education. And the ones that have had any contact with their charge, it was to destroy it: Environment; national parks; workplace safety; health care.

 

Well governments are like that, people are appointed to positions they are not trained for. 

But this was a large privately held resource company. Do you know many corporations that like to pad their board of directors with people that have no experience? Only politics or nepotism makes that happen.

Posted
3 minutes ago, abrahamzvi said:

These so called "documents" - the statement of the sacked prosecutor  - are being contradicted by facts. The statement may or may not be fake, but it is simply untrue and contradicted by actual undispotable facts.

You mean those facts disagree with your facts.

  • Confused 1
Posted
1 minute ago, canuckamuck said:

That's not what the fired prosecutor says. He says he refused to stop investigating Burisma.

There is no sense in arguing about facts, they speak for themselves, and they are in contradiction of what the "statement" by the sacked prosecutor says. Full Stop.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, canuckamuck said:

You mean those facts disagree with your facts.

No, these are not my facts or someone else's ones. Facts are facts, as opposed to statements or lies. 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...