Jump to content

Army chief Gen Apirat warns Thailand is facing “hybrid warfare”


webfact

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Denim said:

Oh.....and grant ourselves immunity from any and all future prosecutions.

You mean grant ourselves CONSTITUTIONAL immunity from any and all future prosecutions.

 

A protection instigated by Boonyaratglin to ensure last weeks usurpers couldn't be banged up by next week's usurpers.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, neeray said:

Thanks cmsally. I've been reading each post carefully trying to sleuth out the justification for using the word "hybrid" by the army chief. (thought that might mean guns and digital propaganda)

But your suggestion of "hydra" might be more correct. I had to do a Wiki on "hydra".

Hydra is a fictional terrorist organization appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics.

Well personally I prefer the version from Greek mythology !

Quote

According to Hesiod, the Hydra was the offspring of Typhon and Echidna.[3] It had poisonous breath and blood so virulent that even its scent was deadly.[4] The Hydra possessed many heads, the exact number of which varies according to the source. Later versions of the Hydra story add a regeneration feature to the monster: for every head chopped off, the Hydra would regrow two heads.[5] Heracles required the assistance of his nephew Iolaus to cut off all of the monster's heads and burn the neck using sword and fire.

Strangely when I first read the title , I automatically inserted "hydra" for "hybrid". I had to go and reread to realise it was hybrid. This often happens when I skim read and brings up some interesting results such as this one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Thaiwrath said:

Their ultimate aim is to win elections

 

 

And Prayut's ultimate aim is to make sure they don't win elections at any cost, otherwise, him and all his cronies at the trough are finished, and Thailand can look to move forward !

"... finished at the trough' is just one aspect.

 

I believe their fear is loss of military control of the country, loss of military status, and they will fight however to see that nothing whatever changes in terms of the military control they now have. 

 

I do however wonder how coordinated the army general who just have the lecture and PM really are. They come from totally different and both very powerful factions in the army. 

I also wonder how wise it is for this general to be talking / making comments about the kxxx?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Scott Tracy said:

He has to justify his position and huge budget. Time for the current PM to clip some wings, as this guy could well be the next coup leader. Twas ever thus....

Nice idea but I suggest way off realism, in fact I suspect the PM is frightened of this army general and they do come from very different and both very powerful army factions. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Eligius said:

It will take a massive, culture-transforming, international news-making event and series of events.

But the Thais do not have anything like the mettle for it - not in a thousand years. Nor do they even really wish for such change (not really).

'Mai pen rai. Let's take a selfie of me and my noodle soup and put it on Fae-Book.'  That is much more important, don't you know?!

 

 

So true about the populace not having the mettle for it. 

 

IF (and it’s a big and highly improbable if) anything happens from the people’s side then it will be sparked by something completely out of left field and completely unexpected ...all of the other normal channels are now effectively closed (permanently I would say).

 

One thing I have never understood is why the southern insurgence stays isolated to the south? I have always wondered why they never hit the capital? I think there must be some kind of gentlemen’s agreement happening between both sides.

Edited by bowerboy
W
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2019 at 3:33 PM, webfact said:

Army Commander-in-Chief Gen Apirat Kongsompong warned this morning that Thailand is facing what he described as a “hybrid warfare” being waged by a collection of “ill-intentioned politicians”,  remnants of communist ideologues and “foreign forces” against the country’s major establishments.

I wonder if the ''virtual army'' of the risky long term visitors over 50 yo who populate in big numbers the thai visa forum is included in the ''foreing forces''.

After all the tought is sometimes sharper than the sword and all the

harassment against the ''aliens'' in the last years could be make sense in this context.

Edited by kingofthemountain
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, bowerboy said:

 

So true about the populace not having the mettle for it. 

 

IF (and it’s a big and highly improbable if) anything happens from the people’s side then it will be sparked by something completely out of left field and completely unexpected ...all of the other normal channels are now effectively closed (permanently I would say).

 

One thing I have never understood is why the southern insurgence stays isolated to the south? I have always wondered why they never hit the capital? I think there must be some kind of gentlemen’s agreement happening between both sides.

Part of the answer is old history about some parts of the far South (high muslim populated parts) belonging to Malaysia and they want their area back under Malaysian territory and culture.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Eligius said:

Sadly, I have to agree with you, Bowerboy (above, and above that): THEY have won. And they have won without even the pretence of a fight, of a kick-back, of resistance, of non-cooperation from the People. Nothing. Zero. Nada (except for a few very, very brave individual souls - mainly young students).

 

When I look back over history and stand in awe at the way whole nations opposed tyranny or were even formed (at huge risk and personal danger) on the entire concept of liberty and freedom of speech and political opinion - and then look at what the Thais have made (or allowed to be made) of their nation: well, you can fill in the rest for yourself ....

       

 

I know....the complete and total capitulation of the populace could not be any more pathetic...pure apathy, sloth and laziness. It has very hard to respect anyone who has such complete and utter apathy towards the future of their children and the country they live in....one of the many reasons my time here is limited until I can get relocated out of here. Sadly the events of the last 10 years (and particularly the last 6 to 8 months) have made it very hard for me to respect the people I live amongst and my disdain is becoming increasingly obvious to those I interact with here.

 

Not so much as a squeak from the people. I look forward to the “would you risk it” crowd piping up particularly in light of current events elsewhere in Asia (for far far lesser infringements and from people with much much more to lose).

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/11/2019 at 11:39 AM, Eligius said:

The general says of these evil, villainous people: '“Their ultimate aim is to win elections, seize executive power, and to change the Constitution,” he said.

Aiming to win elections, eh? Such hellish, vile, disgusting and diabolical criminals!!!!

(I sometimes wonder if Thailand nowadays is a giant, living satire - it surely must be ...).

yes...

Although one thing becoming apparent in the long period of peace we are having in Western countries since 1945, is that democracy as it is practiced in the West is pulling countries towards some sort of politically correct red-green mainstream totalitarism for "the greater good", instead of towards personal freedom.

My opinion of Thailand is that it has preserved more personal liberties than Western countries, and I tend to weigh personal liberties heavier than many.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Every protester through out history have faced these and bigger risks.

 

No one goes to a protest expecting to die. They know things could get out of control but no one goes into it knowingly expecting to die. When people do die it is normally the beginning of an even stronger movement for justice with those deaths as the rallying call (Bloody Sunday, Amritsar are just a couple of examples). 

 

It is no different than driving here. 200 people is just 3 days death toll. No one expects to die when they drive their vehicle but yet many do. It doesn’t stop them driving. What is the difference? I have protested before and things got very ugly...wrong place at the wrong time is part and parcel of it...no one expects to be in the wrong place at the wrong time but it can happen.

 

Look what is happening elsewhere in Asia and around the world....the risks are the same there (if not greater) then they are here.

 

Also that is the first I have ever heard of 200 civilians being shot down...what is the source of that please? If that had been the case then surely it would be there alongside Thammasat University in the annals of history (far less than 200). 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.











×
×
  • Create New...