Jump to content

Former Thomas Cook boss defends record, pay after firm's collapse


Recommended Posts

Posted

Former Thomas Cook boss defends record, pay after firm's collapse

 

48654.PNG

People walk past a closed Thomas Cook travel agents store near Manchester, Britain, October 9, 2019. REUTERS/Phil Noble/Files

 

LONDON (Reuters) - The former chief executive of bankrupt travel firm Thomas Cook on Tuesday said he understood public anger over his pay but defended his record, saying he had worked tirelessly to try and save the company.

 

Thomas Cook collapsed last month, stranding over a hundred thousand passengers as its UK business went into liquidation.

 

Appearing before a British parliamentary committee, Peter Fankhauser again apologised to customers, staff and suppliers for the firm’s collapse but did not say if he would hand back any of his pay.

 

Asked about his salary, Fankhauser said he did not set his own pay or decide his bonus.

 

“I fully understand the sentiment in the public,” he told the committee.

 

“However, what I can say to that is that I worked tirelessly for the success of this company and I’m deeply sorry that I was not able to secure the deal.”

 

He said that a 750,000 pound ($949,950) bonus he was paid in 2017 could theoretically be clawed back, but 30% was paid in shares which were now worthless.

 

Fankhauser said that his efforts to transform the company on his appointment in 2014 had been constrained by its debts, and that responsibility for the collapse was shared between multiple parties who tried, and failed, to agree a restructuring plan.

 

The firm collapsed after it became unable to service its debts and failed to convince banks to back a rescue plan in the face of changing customer habits and intense competition from low-cost airlines and internet companies.

 

reuters_logo.jpg

-- © Copyright Reuters 2019-10-15
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

 

He said that a 750,000 pound ($949,950) bonus he was paid in 2017

How is it possible for a person to receive sums of this kind without really doing his duty?
In such a situation we only talk about the unemployed resulting from this mismanagement, who thinks of all the families ???

  • Like 2
Posted
3 hours ago, 30la said:

How is it possible for a person to receive sums of this kind without really doing his duty?
In such a situation we only talk about the unemployed resulting from this mismanagement, who thinks of all the families ???

 

Because the board and senior managers look after themselves and couldn't give a toss about anyone else, in many cases.

 

And, as has been shown many times, auditors aren't always worth their fat salaries either.

Posted
1 hour ago, stevenl said:

From what I have read from travel business insiders he did a very good job, and the TC demise can not be put on his plate.

 

Maybe so. But that doesn't justify such a large bonus and remuneration package given that the firm was in severe debt problems.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Cereal said:

Those Thomas Cook people are idiots. I would have ran the company into the ground for 1/2 that!

I'd have done it for 1/4 (they can keep their shares though), and a load of free holidays.

  • Haha 1
Posted

I saw a study in a psychology magazine that showed an unusually high % of senior managers show psychopathic behaviours.

 

Here's proof.  Any normal person would have refused the bonus or donated it to a hardship fund for ex-employees.

 

Claw back 100% of his bonus, but leave him with the shares.

  • Like 2
Posted
20 hours ago, stevenl said:

From what I have read from travel business insiders he did a very good job, and the TC demise can not be put on his plate.

Why?he ran it,the buck stops with him.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted
On 10/16/2019 at 11:23 AM, alan grice said:

Twaddle he new that , but he took it on with full knowledge of the eventual outcome.


Sent from my iPhone using Thaivisa Connect

Hense his job! How he gets paid! Closing down big business is profitable. 

Posted

Happens all the time and in all countries. The excesses of the wealthy are limitless - they are all about their own bank accounts.  Mnay years ago there was an arbitrary limit put on what any senior manager in a public company could earn.  That was removed to encourage 'entrepreneurship' and to reward great business results (Bill Clinton).  Of course this resulted in exactly the opposite behaviours as CEOs and Boards 'strip mined' companies for the bonuses.  Most of them realise that if they do this too much the public will finally have had enough and demand change. So they 'manage' things to achieve maximum bonuses while not killing the 'golden goose'.  However - when the company starts into a tail spin that cannot be stopped, then they make sure they look after themselves for the next few years.  The previous CEO and Board was piad out when things were stuffed, and this CEO and Board did what they were paid to do - keep TC alive for as long as possible while they all made their money.  Dont worry - he and they will be fine and will get another gig shortly ???? And dont worry - it will all blow over and go away and everyone will forget about it soon enough. And the beat goes on.........

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...