Jump to content

Thailand’s FM Don in hot water over claim of US tipoff about Baghdad drone attack


Recommended Posts

Posted

Thailand’s FM Don in hot water over claim of US tipoff about Baghdad drone attack

 

Don-P.jpg

 

Thailand’s Foreign Minister Don Pramudwinai has come under heavy criticism for his public claim on Tuesday that the United States had informed Thailand in advance about the drone attack that killed General Qasem Soleimani, Iranian commander of the elite Quds force, at Baghdad airport on January 3rd.

 

United Front for Democracy against Dictatorship (UDD) chairman Jatuporn Promphan said today he wondered what good will come from Mr. Don’s statement. He said, as Foreign Minister, he should step down because the situation is highly sensitive and Thailand has no place getting involved in the US-Iran issue.

 

He quoted the Shiite Muslim leader in Thailand, who had described Mr. Don’s statement was “unwise” and who also doubted the Foreign Minister’s claim about advance US Military tactical intelligence, when the information had been withheld from both the UK government and the entire US Congress. Jatuporn said he would wait to see how Prime Minister Prayut Chan-o-cha deals with the Foreign Minister, noting that the inappropriate remark could unnecessarily risk Thailand being dragged into the conflict.

 

Full story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/thailands-fm-don-in-hot-water-over-claim-of-us-tipoff-about-baghdad-drone-attack/

 

thaipbs.jpg

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

Blabbermouth, did he really had to go and divulge such sensitive information? for what purpose and what gains? he would tell you how much money he's got in the bank would he? than why putting Thailand in an awkward situation giving the fact that Thailand relies of Shia dominated countries for tourism and trades?...

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 hours ago, webfact said:

the inappropriate remark could unnecessarily risk Thailand being dragged into the conflict.

They've got the tanks, attack helicopters and the Stryker APC's, now if only they could speed up delivery of the Chinese submarines, they're right to go!

Posted

A post in which the quoted content had been altered has been removed as per the following forum rule:

 

16) You will not make changes to quoted material from other members posts, except for purposes of shortening the quoted post. This cannot be done in such a manner that it alters the context of the original post.

  • Like 1
Posted
5 hours ago, webfact said:

He quoted the Shiite Muslim leader in Thailand, who had described Mr. Don’s statement was “unwise” and who also doubted the Foreign Minister’s claim about advance US Military tactical intelligence, when the information had been withheld from both the UK government and the entire US Congress

Just puffing up his feathers to make himself look important and as though he's somehow "in-the-loop"

it won't drag Thailand into anything as no-ones interested in this little arid land.

But the problem is if you start to shout your mouth off someone will hear you, and you might get a response from Mr T. 
Unfavourable sanctions and at the moment a whisker away from being on a certain watch-list.

Now's the time to stay quiet.

 

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, colinneil said:

Well poor ole Don, not been getting noticed much recently, so he comes out with this stupid comment just to make himself look important.... Pathetic.

me too...

  • Haha 1
Posted
3 hours ago, DoctorG said:

I cannot imagine why TH would have been given any info on this.

 

Unless there was an attempt at International agreement/support before the attack, and all those State leaders who say they knew nothing about it in advance......are lying?

 

That might mean there was "anonymous" support.

 

Or it might mean that everyone said, anonymously, "**** ***".

 

Or something in between.

 

 

Posted
3 hours ago, Jessi said:

Very unlikely that the U.S would tell anything in advance to a corrupt country like Thailand.. 

????

 

Unless Trump was "scraping the barrel" for International approval/support.

 

Which he may well have been.

 

It's "any port in a storm" for the desperate sociopath.

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Heart-broken 1
Posted
6 hours ago, cardinalblue said:

Thailand can supply the subs as long as they don’t leave the gulf of thailand...

First major headache would be Navigating their way out of Port !

  • Haha 1
Posted
19 minutes ago, trainman34014 said:

First major headache would be Navigating their way out of Port !

Second major headache: Locating Baghdad on a world map.

Third: Finding out the hard way that the Tigris is is too shallow to be navigated by sophisticated Thai submarines.

Posted
3 hours ago, Enoon said:

 

Unless Trump was "scraping the barrel" for International approval/support.

 

Which he may well have been.

 

It's "any port in a storm" for the desperate sociopath.

 

 

I doubt it.....Not Thailand.

Posted

No one is really in hot water here. He could get found out to have served time in prison for selling drugs and he’d stay in power.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, dcnx said:

No one is really in hot water here. He could get found out to have served time in prison for selling drugs and he’d stay in power.

It's good to be the "Don".

Posted

I can imagine the scene in the situation room, DT: ' Has anyone informed Thailand of our intent ?', Big General type chap: 'No Mr President' DT: Whaaat ? You know we can't move without informing Big Don' Big General type chap: 'Sorry Mr President, I'm on it right now'.

 

I don't bloody think so ???? 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...