Democrats condemn Trump at trial as threat to American democracy

[Puchaiyank]

"I’m not a mark I know a con when I see it"

 

You are still unable to see the con job placed on the American people by HRC and now the Bidens...love is blind.  ☺

[earlinclaifornia]

7 hours ago, Cryingdick said:

Also for what it is worth Trump has shown himself to be more than a mere threat to the old ways of doing things the dems so vehemently try to protect.

 

 

 

Like his honesty? Integrity? Respect? Those threats are ones I personally cherish and he is opposite of them in so many ways.

[earlinclaifornia]

2 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

No. Nor would I be happy with a President that used his office and power to coerce a young impressionable intern into sexual activities; and then lied about them to the government and on TV when addressing the American people - watch his lips!

 

But the Democrats apparently have no problem with that. Or with voting not to impeach him on partisan party line.

 

As with most liberal left political parties, the Democrats are full of hypocrisy and do as we say not as we do mentality. What's worse, they seem to believe this is their right. Which is why they're the real threat to democracy.

 

The activities of Pelosi, Schiff, Schummer and Biden should all be closely looked at. Wonder what was going on during the Obama years.

Are you telling us she put it in her mouth because the power of the Presidency?

[Sujo]

3 hours ago, Baerboxer said:

 

Indeed.

 

But it was a clear attempt by a foreign power to influence the result of the Brexit referendum by threatening to put any trade discussions at the back of the queue.

 

As such, he should be fully investigated - and not by the seemingly part of the Democrat party FBI!

It wasnt an election for govt. It was a non binding poll.

[Fred white]

9 hours ago, Tug said:

You are missing my point we will rember come November 

Trump 2020

[Sujo]

3 minutes ago, Fred white said:

Trump 2020

Thats great eyesight for someone his age.

 

Unfortunately he has no 2020 hindsight.

[Fred white]

5 hours ago, Jane Dough said:

Mr Bumble once said that the "law is a ass".

 

Now it appears that nearly half of the American voting public is just that after electing one.

 

Worse still, they still can't accept the error of their ways despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.

 

American democracy will survive this hit but will they learn the lessons?

Rooster

You mean instead of choosing socialism I like my tax cut and not being fined for not having insurance and the stock market being up has increased my 401 also the so called Cadillac tax on insurance going away will help my friends still working so maybe you need to worry more about the UK and their high taxes can't carry a gun to protect your self but can get stabbed

[Eric Loh]

18 minutes ago, Fred white said:

Trump 2020

That will be the year Trump madness end.

[RideJocky]

4 hours ago, Laza 45 said:

Here is a very comprehensive list for you:

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_executive_actions_by_Donald_Trump

..a graph showing the rising use of executive orders by Trump..

“...the rising use of executive orders by Trump...”

 

Hilarious. Do you not understand that the chart is cumulative and only starts when Trump took office? 
 

At the rate he’s going he’ll probably issue more than Obama but only might catch Clinton in total numbers. 
 

The reL question is which of these do you see as circumventing the Constitution? 
 

 

[Chiphigh]

12 hours ago, Laza 45 said:

...and if the Democrats coerced another nation to dig dirt on Trump and withheld aid approved you would be happy with that??  

You mean like the dnc and Joe Biden? 

[JHolmesJr]

of course they are going to condemn him....at every turn...again and again.....that

is the only answer they have for his dominance over their candidates.

[Laza 45]

9 minutes ago, Chiphigh said:

You mean like the dnc and Joe Biden? 

Can you or anyone post a link form a credible source that points to Biden's guilt??  Many Trumpers bang on about this but I have never seen any credible evidence.. 

[RideJocky]

4 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

of course they are going to condemn him....at every turn...again and again.....that

is the only answer they have for his dominance over their candidates.

I will say if he wins in November it will prove all the dominating influence corporate media once enjoyed is over.

 

The attacks have been relentless from day one. The left would have us believe it has something to do with Trump. It does not. It would/will be the same with any non-leftist that gets elected. 
 

 

[RideJocky]

2 minutes ago, Laza 45 said:

Can you or anyone post a link form a credible source that points to Biden's guilt??  Many Trumpers bang on about this but I have never seen any credible evidence.. 

 

Can you or anyone post a link form a credible source that points to Trump’s guilt??  Many Leftists bang on about this but I have never seen any credible evidence.. 

[Chiphigh]

11 minutes ago, Laza 45 said:

Can you or anyone post a link form a credible source that points to Biden's guilt??  Many Trumpers bang on about this but I have never seen any credible evidence.. 

You mean like bragging on camera about getting a prosecutor fired that was investigating his son's employer by threatening to withhold a billion dollar aid package? 

[JHolmesJr]

If you want to see what a threat to democracy looks like, look no further than

what's happening in Iowa at the democrat caucuses. They havent released the results

even though candidates have moved on to New Hampshire....could it be that the democratically

nominated winner does not meet the standards of the DNC apparatchiks?

[Fred white]

3 minutes ago, JHolmesJr said:

If you want to see what a threat to democracy looks like, look no further than

what's happening in Iowa at the democrat caucuses. They havent released the results

even though candidates have moved on to New Hampshire....could it be that the democratically

nominated winner does not meet the standards of the DNC apparatchiks?

like what happened between hilary and bernie

[sirineou]

12 hours ago, WalkingOrders said:

I suppose you would like us removed? Re-educated? Banned? Our candidates removed from the ballot? Our districts flooded with illegal immigrants? The voting age lowered to 16 while indoctrinating our children? An end to the electoral college? Non-citizen voting? Trouble indeed.

I don't mean to be rude by my following reply , I am sure most of you are otherwise very nice people,and pretty smart in other subjects, or some of you are too young to know better but.

   Re-educated would imply some education on the subject where none exists, This is obvious by the quality of the arguments, and  the ease all your sides  arguments  are defeated, to which your side moves on to a different argument, deflects , or simply reply with a laugh emoji.

  I challenge your side to defend any aspect of trump's behaviour and I will handily defeat it with supporting evidence. I am very confident in making this challenge because  what he did is wrong and a danger to our county, there are no two ways about it, all the rest are rationalizations easily defeated. 

     What need to be done is a difficult proposition,

I had started a very IMO interesting thread on the dangers of Democracy Which IMO is a very bad form of government, except for all the rest. I believe that some short of basic qualifications for voting need to be applied but then you have the danger of who determines the qualifications and how they are applied. I am sure such process would be usurped by special interest for their own personal gain. Machiavelli's The Prince  is interesting reading.  But you can't have someone who knows very  little about a subject vote on it, for obvious reasons and predictable results.  If someone cant even locate a particular country on the map , and knows nothing about it, said person should not have an opinion, again for obvious reasons. 

 

[Crazy Alex]

4 hours ago, Laza 45 said:

Can you or anyone post a link form a credible source that points to Biden's guilt??  Many Trumpers bang on about this but I have never seen any credible evidence.. 

Joe Biden's own words:

 

 

[Crazy Alex]

3 hours ago, Sujo said:

And, nothing wrong with what he did. Its been debunked for months. Please keep up.

 

But if you want to have it your false way, then trump is guilty.

I don't understand. How can a person's own words be debunked? Honestly, I don't understand what you're trying to claim here.

[candide]

2 hours ago, Crazy Alex said:

I don't understand. How can a person's own words be debunked? Honestly, I don't understand what you're trying to claim here.

You perfectly understand. You are just deflecting. There was no investigation into Biden's son and Biden applied an official US policy, just likenthe EU or the IMF applied the same policy.

[Crazy Alex]

5 minutes ago, candide said:

You perfectly understand. You are just deflecting. There was no investigation into Biden's son and Biden applied an official US policy, just likenthe EU or the IMF applied the same policy.

I never said any investigation into Biden's son occurred. Given Biden's openly bragging about extorting Ukraine, that's precisely the problem. So no, I don't understand. I really don't. And what am I deflecting from anyway?

 

But let's explore the "official US policy" angle. Regarding foreign affairs, who decides "official US policy"?

[candide]

3 minutes ago, Crazy Alex said:

I never said any investigation into Biden's son occurred. Given Biden's openly bragging about extorting Ukraine, that's precisely the problem. So no, I don't understand. I really don't. And what am I deflecting from anyway?

 

But let's explore the "official US policy" angle. Regarding foreign affairs, who decides "official US policy"?

Nice try!

[Sujo]

1 hour ago, Crazy Alex said:

I never said any investigation into Biden's son occurred. Given Biden's openly bragging about extorting Ukraine, that's precisely the problem. So no, I don't understand. I really don't. And what am I deflecting from anyway?

 

But let's explore the "official US policy" angle. Regarding foreign affairs, who decides "official US policy"?

Its been explained many times and im not going to waste time again to educate you. Do your own research.

[chokrai]

On 2/4/2020 at 7:11 AM, Laza 45 said:

To start with I really detest name calling.. it really is an unproductive and condescending contribution to intelligent discourse.  My own position is that I support rule of law.

Seems like you are the only Democrat that does.

[chokrai]

11 hours ago, sirineou said:

I don't mean to be rude by my following reply , I am sure most of you are otherwise very nice people,and pretty smart in other subjects, or some of you are too young to know better but.

   Re-educated would imply some education on the subject where none exists, This is obvious by the quality of the arguments, and  the ease all your sides  arguments  are defeated, to which your side moves on to a different argument, deflects , or simply reply with a laugh emoji.

  I challenge your side to defend any aspect of trump's behaviour and I will handily defeat it with supporting evidence. I am very confident in making this challenge because  what he did is wrong and a danger to our county, there are no two ways about it, all the rest are rationalizations easily defeated. 

     What need to be done is a difficult proposition,

I had started a very IMO interesting thread on the dangers of Democracy Which IMO is a very bad form of government, except for all the rest. I believe that some short of basic qualifications for voting need to be applied but then you have the danger of who determines the qualifications and how they are applied. I am sure such process would be usurped by special interest for their own personal gain. Machiavelli's The Prince  is interesting reading.  But you can't have someone who knows very  little about a subject vote on it, for obvious reasons and predictable results.  If someone cant even locate a particular country on the map , and knows nothing about it, said person should not have an opinion, again for obvious reasons. 

 

Lots of educated old fools out there.

[chokrai]

34 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Its been explained many times and im not going to waste time again to educate you. Do your own research.

Maybe you should do some more research and I don't mean watching CNN. There are quite a few reports coming out about Biden and his whole crooked family. 

[RideJocky]

11 hours ago, sirineou said:

I don't mean to be rude by my following reply , I am sure most of you are otherwise very nice people,and pretty smart in other subjects, or some of you are too young to know better but.

   Re-educated would imply some education on the subject where none exists, This is obvious by the quality of the arguments, and  the ease all your sides  arguments  are defeated, to which your side moves on to a different argument, deflects , or simply reply with a laugh emoji.

  I challenge your side to defend any aspect of trump's behaviour and I will handily defeat it with supporting evidence. I am very confident in making this challenge because  what he did is wrong and a danger to our county, there are no two ways about it, all the rest are rationalizations easily defeated. 

     What need to be done is a difficult proposition,

I had started a very IMO interesting thread on the dangers of Democracy Which IMO is a very bad form of government, except for all the rest. I believe that some short of basic qualifications for voting need to be applied but then you have the danger of who determines the qualifications and how they are applied. I am sure such process would be usurped by special interest for their own personal gain. Machiavelli's The Prince  is interesting reading.  But you can't have someone who knows very  little about a subject vote on it, for obvious reasons and predictable results.  If someone cant even locate a particular country on the map , and knows nothing about it, said person should not have an opinion, again for obvious reasons. 

 

Yes, clearly only really smart people like you (coincidentally all leftists) should be allowed to vote. This is clearly the only way to insure free and fair elections.

 

All we need to figure out how to do it while not having anyone show any form of identification. Maybe set it up so voters are locked out until they pass some sort of test.

[PhonThong]

On 2/4/2020 at 6:54 AM, Tug said:

No sir I’m sure you are aware over 70%of voters wanted evidence and witnesses full stop it’s plane as day donald is guilty of the charges the display of cowardice and partisanship by the republicans will be rembered come November and as a side note Mitch McConnell will be pay as well Donald Trump imo is unsuited for the job as potus that’s saying it nice

And yet, 97% of all Republicans voted for Trump in the Iowa Caucuses.  Looks to me as if the "Donald" is doing just fine.

[xylophone]

6 minutes ago, PhonThong said:

And yet, 97% of all Republicans voted for Trump in the Iowa Caucuses.  Looks to me as if the "Donald" is doing just fine.

Probably because they think they are in Kansas!!!

 

Dumb as a bag of rocks........so Republicans support a compulsive liar, a cheat, a fraud, a misogynist, an adulterer and someone who is plainly stupid. What does that say???? 

 

Got to be the worst US president ever.