Jump to content

Trump ousts White House staffer who testified against him in impeachment - lawyer


Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, chokrai said:

He does have the weasel face thing going on.

How many medals of honor have you earned.

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Sujo said:

He does have the weasel face thing going on.

Judgeing some one for their facial features and expressions over which they have no control, speaks volumes

Posted
7 minutes ago, chokrai said:

Did he win the medal of honor?

 

Sorry, he earned the purple heart. Does that make you feel better.

Posted
4 minutes ago, RideJocky said:


 

Yes, every time a leftist comments about Trump  being fat or the orange hair thing it speaks volumes. 
 

It speaks to everyone (not on the left) and confirms what hypocrites leftists are. 
 

 

Trump could control his weight and hair colour now you mention it, neither of those attributes are genetic, they are lifestyle and choice.

 

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, RJRS1301 said:

Trump could control his weight and hair colur now yu mention it, neither of those attributes are genetic, they are lifestyle and choice.

 

He cant control his ego though.

  • Like 2
Posted
16 minutes ago, RideJocky said:


 

Yes, every time a leftist comments about Trump  being fat or the orange hair thing it speaks volumes. 
 

It speaks to everyone (not on the left) and confirms what hypocrites leftists are. 
 

 

And the clowns obvious bias, racism etc., towards blacks and minorities is all A OK?

  • Thanks 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, RideJocky said:

 

 

Weak

Is it ok for trump supporters to denigrate a purple heart recipient who has dedicated his life to the service of US.

 

He looks like a soiboy.

Traitor.

Etc.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Chiphigh said:

If you don't want to admit that there were govt employees and agencies that knowingly started investigating the Trump campaign based on unfounded and false information, you are purposely ignoring the the facts that have been steadily being revealed. 

Nothing unfounded. The investigation into how it started was shown to be above board.

  • Like 1
Posted

Honour, now that appears to an attribute lacking in some quarters of the administration.

I note that the"family" are very silent of late. 

  • Like 2
Posted
6 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Wrong. He acted in accordance with his oath. Foreign policy has nothing to do with it. Unless you thing foreign policy is to ask foreign govts to investigate political rivals. Against the constirution.

 

He was not the wb so he reported nothing. He did his duty answering a subpoena. Thats what men of honor do.

.. "For the land of the free, and the home of the brave"

Posted
10 minutes ago, Sujo said:

He was not the wb so he reported nothing. He did his duty answering a subpoena. Thats what men of honor do.


So when the last administration refused to “answer“ subpoenas it proved the lacked honor, yes? 
 

 

  • Like 2
Posted
39 minutes ago, Chiphigh said:

If you don't want to admit that there were govt employees and agencies that knowingly started investigating the Trump campaign based on unfounded and false information, you are purposely ignoring the the facts that have been steadily being revealed. 

 You have no evidence. It's not what Horowitz wrote and said. Is he also 'deep state' now?

So it is what is is, 'noise' tactics a la Bannon.

  • Like 2
Posted
32 minutes ago, RideJocky said:


So when the last administration refused to “answer“ subpoenas it proved the lacked honor, yes? 
 

 

Yes

Posted
49 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Is it ok for trump supporters to denigrate a purple heart recipient who has dedicated his life to the service of US.

 

He looks like a soiboy.

Traitor.

Etc.


I said nothing about his looks. 
 

I was just pointing out what hypocrites leftists are when they ridicule others for what they do constantly. 
 

You don’t see it, whatever. 
 

 

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Yes


So when President Obama felt it was in the best interest of the country to not “answer” all those subpoenas he lacked honor. 
 

And had he “answered” the subpoenas knowing it would damage the United States he would have been doing the honorable thing. 
 

Just want to be clear. 
 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
21 minutes ago, candide said:

 You have no evidence. It's not what Horowitz wrote and said. Is he also 'deep state' now?

So it is what is is, 'noise' tactics a la Bannon.

No evidence? The Carter Page fisas were specifically called out as bogus just last week, the fbi director just testified that they and the doj illegally surveilled Carter Page. 

 

These are just the ones that they have admitted to. 

 

Durham has opened a criminal investigation. 

 

What planet are you on? 

  • Like 2

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...