Jump to content

Many patients last week got infection from family member


webfact

Recommended Posts

Many patients last week got infection from family member

By The Nation

 

800_69fa4cdcbffd9c4.jpg?v=1586681600

 

In nearly 56 per cent of Covid-19 cases last week through close contact, the source was a family member, the Ministry of Public Health revealed.

 

It urged people to stay home during this Songkran festival, keep distance within the house and wear a mask.

 

1586672507_1.jpg

 

Dr Anupong Sujariyakul, a senior expert at the Disease Control Department, told a press briefing that during the week April 4-10, 495 confirmed cases were reported. Of the total, 144 patients who got infected through close contacts, 56 per cent of cases were from a family member, followed by co-workers 23 per cent, gathering or meeting with friends 18 per cent, and public transportation or crowded areas cases 3 per cent.

 

1586672526_3.jpg

 

Dr Bancha Khakhong, deputy chief of the ministry's Department of Health, revealed a poll that said of people who stayed at home, 50 per cent continued to work or see the doctor, 38 per cent remained indoors while 12 per cent were visited by someone.

 

As for the guidelines for self-protection when staying at home, up to 84.3 per cent washed their hands or used alcohol hand cleansing gel, 76.7 per cent were wearing a mask, 59.2 per cent were careful about not touching the nose and mouth and 58.8 per cent kept a distance of 1-2 metres.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/news/30385836

 

nation.jpg

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-04-13
Link to comment
Share on other sites


8 minutes ago, cornishcarlos said:

 

Exactly.... I'm in Singapore still, and while we are a little more relaxed than a lot of the Western countries, the reaction is still way out of proportion to the numbers !!

8 deaths attributed to C-19... Annual average from influenza is 600.... Someone is taking the p i ss ??

Take it you believe that prevention is not better than the non existent cure.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

Interesting split of cases, so public transport, walking, shopping all a very low risk. Close contact with family as suspected a big risk all in the same house and repeated interactions with the virus in the air

It prevents spread outside of the family/home unit. Once you include public activities there are no limits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, cornishcarlos said:

 

Exactly.... I'm in Singapore still, and while we are a little more relaxed than a lot of the Western countries, the reaction is still way out of proportion to the numbers !!

8 deaths attributed to C-19... Annual average from influenza is 600.... Someone is taking the p i ss ??

 

Just a quote from a research paper;

 

"

Influenza virus infections cause excess illness and deaths in temperate countries. In the Northern and Southern Hemispheres, influenza epidemics occur nearly every winter, leading to an increase in hospitalizations and deaths.The World Health Organization (WHO) estimated that these annual epidemics result in 3 to 5 million cases of severe illness and 250,000–500,000 deaths each year around the world (1). In the United States, influenza is responsible for 50 million illnesses and up to 47,200 deaths annually (2–4)."

 

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/7282087_Influenza-associated_Deaths_in_Tropical_Singapore

Yes, things do seem a little out of proportion. I mean we still have the horrendous fatalities on the roads in Thailand. More people are killed EVERYDAY than total registered deaths of Covid-19.

 

When all this is over and we return to some form of normality, I am sure we will see a lot of top economics and politicians worldwide come out and criticise the governments for causing a global recession. 

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, scubascuba3 said:

Interesting split of cases, so public transport, walking, shopping all a very low risk.


The number of bus drivers getting sick suggests public transport may be bad. The latest thinking is that droplet-bourne transmission is the reason this thing is spreading so fast. Depending on airflow, you could get infected from the droplet breathed out by someone who left the room half an hour ago. Enclosed spaces such as elevators are considered to be a particular problem.

The 2m social distancing thing is insufficient too. If someone coughs in a supermarkets, you could get blasted while standing in the next aisle. To a certain extent, it is so hard to avoid that it is pretty much not worth even trying. If you have to go out, to pick up groceries or whatever, you're probably going to catch it.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rabas said:

It prevents spread outside of the family/home unit. Once you include public activities there are no limits.

I agree that it would "prevent" spread outside the family home "if" it was "absolutely" adhered to which just seems to be an unrealistic expectation given the human propensity to socialise and interact with others in the daily necessity to keep the human system we have set up functioning,so try as they might to do the right thing trying to implement measures to stay home cooped up might not be the best measure to apply to C19 and these measures are being applied without scientific studies or proof of efficacy because if close contact is an effective way to spread C19 why try and force people to be in and remain in close proximity in an environment that is conducive to infecting others?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Possibly due to a lack of knowledge, it is new and unknown. People are much more comfortable when they are in possession of facts.

 

You quoted me out of context....

Why don't governments attack these causes of death then..??

starvation, malaria, TB, suicide, mental health, RTAs, normal influenza etc etc they have the facts !!

 

 

Edited by cornishcarlos
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sandyf said:

Possibly due to a lack of knowledge, it is new and unknown. People are much more comfortable when they are in possession of facts.

They also seem to be much more comfortable when they are in possession of what they perceive as facts as many facts seem to stem from over zealous imaginations. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, scubascuba3 said:

Sitting on a bus all day with the virus in the air is probably much higher risk than someone there for a short commute


Yes, I would imagine so. On the other hand, the plastic security screens would give the driver slightly more protection from droplets than regular passengers get, along with the greater distance between his seat and others. Plus he alone would be in contact with surfaces he touches while driving, whereas hundreds of passengers would be touching things like hand rails, bells, and seats.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...