2 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

Lets face it Loiner. After Johnson had to phone Ursula and beg for an extension to the trade talks its all over. 

The Brexiteers blinked first.

As I heard it, Ursula made the booty call. "Hallo Boris........? but no real extension agreed."

 

You must have been a fly on the wrong wall, or was tapping the wrong phone.

 

4 hours ago, Loiner said:

As I heard it, Ursula made the booty call. "Hallo Boris........? but no real extension agreed."

 

You must have been a fly on the wrong wall, or was tapping the wrong phone.

 

Source of these 'facts'? Let me guess: Sunday Express? They must be true then.

4 hours ago, Loiner said:

As I heard it, Ursula made the booty call. 

I personally don't get the importance of who called who. 

The fact is.

Mr. Johnson asked, or agreed, with an extension of the talkings. 

Now I can understand that that is a bitter pill to swallow for the hard Brexiters. 

It shows however that both parties still have a desire to come to an agreement. 

Again, in my opinion, for the benefit of all, not for the delight of a few (who wished/hoped Mr. Johnson would slamming the negotiation door). 

10 hours ago, RayC said:

Source of these 'facts'? Let me guess: Sunday Express? They must be true then.

As true as they would be if ripped from The Grauniad.

How long will you people go on with the "My paper's better than your paper, naa naa na naa naa."

6 minutes ago, Loiner said:

How long will you people go on with the "My paper's better than your paper,

Usually the better/correct one for me, is the one who express an opinion which suits me/ I can fully identify with.

I believe many, if not the majority, feels the same way.

 

4 hours ago, Loiner said:

As true as they would be if ripped from The Grauniad.

How long will you people go on with the "My paper's better than your paper, naa naa na naa naa."

Well it was "you people" wot started it! Naa, naa, naa naa with bells on!

 

I'm not a big fan of The Guardian, but at least the story is usually broadly supportive of the headline. This isn't something that can be said too often of The Express if your samples are anything to go by.

 

Anyway, for the umpteenth time. My paper of choice is the FT. It doesn't support your narrative either. I guess that doesn't matter though? It's common knowledge that the FT is just another anti-UK, communist rag, eh?

5 minutes ago, RayC said:

It's common knowledge that the FT is just another anti-UK, communist rag, eh?

You are the one who reads it, so I’ll bow to your superior knowledge. I’d have just said it is anti-Brexit. 

the epitome of not having an argument is someone who blames the messenger over the message.

 

Understanding your sources is a different matter and requires a rating age over that required for the likes Daily Mail, Sun and Express

23 hours ago, Loiner said:

You are the one who reads it, so I’ll bow to your superior knowledge. I’d have just said it is anti-Brexit. 

That's because it's a sensible paper