Private sector worried over revised community power plant scheme

[webfact]

Private sector worried over revised community power plant scheme

By The Nation

 

 

Flaws in the latest version of the Energy Ministry’s community power plant scheme must be ironed out before it is sent to Cabinet at the end of this year, say stakeholders.

 

New conditions for the much-delayed project were announced on October 9 after a two-week review. The scheme is meant to boost the grassroots economy that has been hit hard by Covid-19.

 

However, private sector sources voiced concern at the new plan to select operators via bidding for the rights to sell electricity at a feed-in tariff (FiT) of Bt3-5.3 per unit.

 

Renewable-energy sector sources are worried that the current FiT rate may affect the cost of electricity.

 

Companies have also urged the ministry to reconsider other dimensions of the scheme, including its environmental and economic impact, if it truly wants to drive the grassroots economy by generating income for communities.

 

The project’s targeted total capacity of 150 megawatts aims to generate at least Bt10 billion per year for local communities through the purchase of farmers’ energy crops.

 

But bid-winners will have to invest an estimated Bt100-120 million per megawatt to construct the biomass power plants.

 

“Most private companies will not bid for the scheme since they are worried about a repeat of the [Energy Ministry’s] 300MW small power plant hybrid project that dumped the average purchase price to Bt2.44 per unit," said one private sector source. This had resulted in power-plant projects being delayed or aborted.

 

The source preferred a previous proposal to select project operators via a lottery method, after screening them to verify they were genuine farmers and power plant operators with agricultural land, to ensure the power plants would actually be built.

 

The lottery should be promoted as a competition to create benefits for the community, rather than focusing on the selling price. Meanwhile the same company should not be entitled to operate more than 3-5 power plants, in order to diversify investment of entrepreneurs and better distribute money into the economy.

 

On the ownership of power plants, the source said community enterprises should hold a 10 per cent stake to ensure community participation in operating the plants and in cultivation of energy crops. Under the current plan, the community does not need to hold any stake in the projects.

 

The National Energy Policy Council (NEPC) will consider the draft community power plant criteria later this month after more revisions by government agencies.

 

Under the current draft, half of the 150MW total capacity will be generated by biomass fuel, mainly fast-growing bamboo, etc. The remaining 75MW will be generated by biogas.

 

Plant operators have to engage in contracts with farmers but no longer require the participation of 200-household community enterprises. As such, the current plan does not clarify how the community will receive its aimed-for 10 per cent share of revenue from the scheme, said the source.

 

Source: https://www.nationthailand.com/business/30396139

 

-- © Copyright The Nation Thailand 2020-10-15

 

- Whatever you're going through, the Samaritans are here for you

- Follow Thaivisa on LINE for breaking COVID-19 updates

[pegman]

Back to the drawing board boys. Does Thailand really need more air pollution from burning stuff?

Edited October 14, 2020 by pegman

[Grumpy John]

I am guessing this is another case of the brainiacs in charge not thinking it through before they did the big announcement.  And I know Thai's are experts at burning stuff...but bio-mass in a country that already has a lot of pollution???   But I will admit I am biased towards solar energy.  And I do know the environmental cost of producing aluminium and the cells but it's far better than bio-mass.  With solar energy the power is needed during the day and that's when it's produced.  The gas and coal plants can handle the nighttime load.

[Redline]

I had read before that the small plants will have fewer pollution restrictions.  If this is true, it's another hit to tourism and quality of life in Thailand.  Thailand continues to drop on the lists of places to retire, and holiday.

Constant lack of thinking and logic continues to doom the country's future.

Edited October 15, 2020 by Redline

[BritManToo]

Why can't we all just be allowed to make our own and feed any excess into the grid as free storage?

Why does there always need to be bidders and bribes?

Edited October 15, 2020 by BritManToo

[Grumpy John]

2 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Why can't we all just be allowed to make our own and feed any excess into the grid as free storage?

Why does their always need to be bidders and bribes?

That's what I did back in Oz!  The government paid for one kW and I paid for the other.  Don't hurt that one of my sons best friend's was an installer!  Saved big $$$'S. 

[rken2]

You currently use solar and sell it, if your gird tie you use the power supplied by the government as your battery, if you use less than you produce they will pay you about 2.5 baht per kilowatt. I am currently doing this. 6 320 watt panels supplies me will 600 to 800 baht of electricity per month.