11 hours ago, ballpoint said:

And, for his latest trick, Trump the demented is calling for a "mega rally" on the day that Congress meets to certify Biden's win.  The world is running out of adjectives to describe this sociopath.

 

"The rally is set to commence at 5am on January 7 (NZ time) in Washington DC, where supporters will protest to pressure Republican lawmakers into overturning Biden's win.

"JANUARY SIXTH, SEE YOU IN DC!" he tweeted Wednesday.

..."It's up to the American people to stop it. Along with President Trump, we will do whatever it takes to ensure the integrity of this election for the good of the nation," the website says.

"Be there, will be wild!" Trump said in a tweet."

 

'Will be wild': Trump plans protest rally the day Congress will meet to certify Biden's win (msn.com)

Yet again another super spreader event brought to you by POTUS....what a guy. I know 350,000 Americans that will not be there.....

10 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

 

Poor try! 

You provided 2 links and I provided 2 quotes, one from each link. 

None of the sources linked states it comes from the the report. It is a quote from Rubio' s comment, not from the report:

"We can say, without any hesitation, that the Committee found absolutely no evidence that then-candidate Donald Trump or his campaign colluded with the Russian government to meddle in the 2016 election," said Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., the committee's acting chairman"

https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2020/08/18/senate-details-paul-manafort-ties-russian-intel-officer-kilimnik/3390437001/

6 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

 

I am not going to entertain you any further. 

 

I have such a feeling that many members active in the Trump threads have been looking forward to that for a long time.

 

 

Off-topic, baiting, bickering posts and replies reported and removed.

 

3 hours ago, PattayaJames said:

 

How can anyone truthfully claim he did say it?

Multiple named people who were there at the time it was alleged who are on record saying they did not hear it vs no one on record saying he did.

Ridiculous.

 

 

 

 

Im sure you will easily find a link to name those people.

 

btw, there is no one on record saying he didnt say it.

37 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Im sure you will easily find a link to name those people.

 

btw, there is no one on record saying he didnt say it.

 

Sure: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/15/trump-says-there-are-25-witnesses-disputing-atlantic

 

BTW not a single person on record saying he did say it. 

 

 

1 hour ago, PattayaJames said:

 

Sure: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/15/trump-says-there-are-25-witnesses-disputing-atlantic

 

BTW not a single person on record saying he did say it. 

 

 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/15/trump-says-there-are-25-witnesses-disputing-atlantic-nope/ is the correct link. See the 'nope' at the end of the link?

From your link "As you can see, the claim that there are 25 “witnesses” is inflated. At best, 14 people denying the story were traveling with the president, but some were not in the room when the alleged conversations took place.".

On 1/1/2021 at 1:46 PM, Pat1888 said:

What a Man what a President as achievement's go he's been the best POTUS since Ronald Reagan.

As an Infantryman of 25 years I was particularly impressed with the way he gave the Pentagon the mission command to annihilate the ISIS Caliphate and took the the restrictive Rules of Engagement off our Troops and allowed them to do their job. The way he supported our Servicemen and Servicewomen was second to none. That's why he will always be held in such high esteem by our Military our Law enforcement and our Patriotic People. Pro Military Pro Law enforcement Pro Constitution. 

 

Unlike his predecessor and his successor.

 

God Bless President Donald J Trump.

You suffer from selective memory.

 

ISIS was in full retreat before Trump took office.  Also, his "peace deal" with the Taliban virtually guarantee they will control Afghanistan again in the near future.  Trump accused Obama of being the founder of ISIS because of his troop withdrawals from Iraq; will Trump then be the founder of the new Taliban?

 

Trump has a funny way of being pro-law enforcement, he supports and seems to encourage illegal acts by the police.  https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-police-nice-suspects/story?id=48914504

 

Trump certainly isn't pro-Constitution when it comes to the Emoluments clause, the Census Count, respecting election results...

19 hours ago, Pat1888 said:

Actions speak louder than words after 8 years off the Democrats decimating the Military and VA President Trump made us a priority again.

How was the Military decimated under Obama?   https://www.macrotrends.net/countries/USA/united-states/military-spending-defense-budget

 

Were pay raises canceled?  What programs were canceled?  What did soldiers in the field lack?

22 hours ago, Pat1888 said:

I my vast experience off the subject yes 95-97% of the Military support President Trump and why we support him because he supports us.

Your vast experience "off the subject"? 

 

People serving in the military only know the views of their immediate circle of friends and (maybe) co-workers.  They don't know the views of the entire military.  The fact that your circle supports your views simply reflects the company you keep.

7 hours ago, PattayaJames said:

 

Sure: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/15/trump-says-there-are-25-witnesses-disputing-atlantic

 

BTW not a single person on record saying he did say it. 

 

 

Still falling for what Trump says?  Stunning....

28 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

Still falling for what Trump says?  Stunning....

Cultists are difficult to convince that they may be incorrect, have a look at scientology and its adherents, jonestown etc.

 

4 hours ago, heybruce said:

Trump has a funny way of being pro-law enforcement, he supports and seems to encourage illegal acts by the police.  https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-police-nice-suspects/story?id=48914504

And with so many blackguards in his circle, some of which are convicted felons, an intelligent person may get the impression that he doesn't have much respect for the law at all.  Doesn't seem to have much place for truth and facts, either.  All anecdotes, political incidents and quotes aside, overall his deeds and associations make him appear to be a disreputable sort.

 

 

8 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

Cultists are difficult to convince that they may be incorrect, have a look at scientology and its adherents, jonestown etc.

 

Understood!  Still, I don't get it.  Hard for me to understand why anyone would fall for his lies.  They're so obvious! 5555

8 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

Understood!  Still, I don't get it.  Hard for me to understand why anyone would fall for his lies.  They're so obvious! 5555

Skyfairy has existed for millenia for billions of folk

 

1 minute ago, RJRS1301 said:

Skyfairy has existed for millenia for billions of folk

 

I use to get a chuckle from Jordan Klepper and his videos of interviews with Trump supporters.  Until I finally determined there are some really stupid people in the US!  Depressing.

2 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

11 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

Understood!  Still, I don't get it.  Hard for me to understand why anyone would fall for his lies.  They're so obvious! 5555

Skyfairy has existed for millenia for billions of folk

Sadly enough, it fits their narrative.

Just now, Jeffr2 said:

I use to get a chuckle from Jordan Klepper and his videos of interviews with Trump supporters.  Until I finally determined there are some really stupid people in the US!  Depressing.

And not just 45 supporters. The dumbing down of America has been painfully documented.

1 hour ago, Jeffr2 said:

Understood!  Still, I don't get it.  Hard for me to understand why anyone would fall for his lies.  They're so obvious! 5555

 

So many people wanted to punch the "you're fired!" guy in the face, but within 2 days of announcing his candidacy that ~35% fell in line behind him and are still there.  Go back to the origin (or oranges, if you prefer) and in the statements he made on those 2 days is certain to contain that something that worked magic on the yokels.

IMO it was word that begins with "M."

 

 

4 hours ago, bendejo said:

 

So many people wanted to punch the "you're fired!" guy in the face, but within 2 days of announcing his candidacy that ~35% fell in line behind him and are still there.  Go back to the origin (or oranges, if you prefer) and in the statements he made on those 2 days is certain to contain that something that worked magic on the yokels.

IMO it was word that begins with "M."

 

 

Maniacal meglomania ?

On 1/2/2021 at 4:36 AM, Pat1888 said:

I my vast experience off the subject yes 95-97% of the Military support President Trump and why we support him because he supports us.

You seem to be relatively new to this forum so just a little pointer to help you out. Personal anecdotes, especially when making some VERY bold statements don't really wash here. Facts and figures substantiated by relaible sources is the way to go. Otherwise you will just get cricified by those that can support their argument with said facts and figures.

'95-97% of the Military support President Trump' is one of those things that just doesn't seem very believable and just undermines and/or negates any other legitimate point you may have.

Reported post removed along with responses.

16 hours ago, stevenl said:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2020/09/15/trump-says-there-are-25-witnesses-disputing-atlantic-nope/ is the correct link. See the 'nope' at the end of the link?

From your link "As you can see, the claim that there are 25 “witnesses” is inflated. At best, 14 people denying the story were traveling with the president, but some were not in the room when the alleged conversations took place.".

 

Great so it 14 to Zero, I said multiple people. Your point is?

1 minute ago, PattayaJames said:

 

Great so it 14 to Zero, I said multiple people. Your point is?

Define "multiple" in this instance please

 

3 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

 

Great so it 14 to Zero, I said multiple people. Your point is?

Firstly I gave the correct link. Secondly I confirmed there are far from 25 people who confirmed Trump's claim. Thirdly the link, see my post for correct one, confirms Trump's claim has not been debunked.

1 hour ago, johnnybangkok said:

You seem to be relatively new to this forum so just a little pointer to help you out. Personal anecdotes, especially when making some VERY bold statements don't really wash here. Facts and figures substantiated by relaible sources is the way to go. Otherwise you will just get cricified by those that can support their argument with said facts and figures.

'95-97% of the Military support President Trump' is one of those things that just doesn't seem very believable and just undermines and/or negates any other legitimate point you may have.

 

Another pointer, this place is infested with Trump hating liberals, facts do not matter to them.

They are happy to believe any anti Trump tripe made up by the MSM, and will defend it rabidly.

As you can see in this thread, even when you have 14 people on record on something they will believe the unnamed sources with not 1 person on record to back it up. 

Then they will argue that Trump said it was 25 people even though you only stated multiple.

And finish it off with calling you a dumbed down cult member.

 

16 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Firstly I gave the correct link. Secondly I confirmed there are far from 25 people who confirmed Trump's claim. Thirdly the link, see my post for correct one, confirms Trump's claim has not been debunked.

 

Firstly let me apologise for the incomplete link you seem to have found it OK, well done.

Secondly I never said there were 25, 14 or whatever, I said there were multiple people, you stated there were non and asked for a link to their names. I provided it.

Your claim was false, as you already knew.

End of story.

 

choose files.urlTrump incites treason and all these madman should be thrown in jail:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-congressman-suggests-violence-in-the-streets-after-judge-rejects-bid-to-force-pence-to-overturn-bidens-win/ar-BB1cqipg?ocid=spartandhp

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pro-trump-lawyer-lin-wood-insists-he-is-not-insane-after-tweeting-that-mike-pence-should-face-execution-by-firing-squad/ar-BB1cpNJm?ocid=spartandhp

 

7 minutes ago, FritsSikkink said:

choose files.urlTrump incites treason and all these madman should be thrown in jail:

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/texas-congressman-suggests-violence-in-the-streets-after-judge-rejects-bid-to-force-pence-to-overturn-bidens-win/ar-BB1cqipg?ocid=spartandhp

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/pro-trump-lawyer-lin-wood-insists-he-is-not-insane-after-tweeting-that-mike-pence-should-face-execution-by-firing-squad/ar-BB1cpNJm?ocid=spartandhp

 

 

One would assume anyone publically calling for the death of trump would be arrested. Accordingly, why arn't these trump world nut cases calling for violence being detained?

51 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

 

Another pointer, this place is infested with Trump hating liberals, facts do not matter to them.

They are happy to believe any anti Trump tripe made up by the MSM, and will defend it rabidly.

As you can see in this thread, even when you have 14 people on record on something they will believe the unnamed sources with not 1 person on record to back it up. 

Then they will argue that Trump said it was 25 people even though you only stated multiple.

And finish it off with calling you a dumbed down cult member.

 

Many who are against Trump are other republicans and conservatives.  Not just liberals.  Facts don't matter to Trump's supporters as your post clearly indicates.