'We must end this uncivil war,' Biden says, taking over a U.S. in crisis

[TallGuyJohninBKK]

I don't think we know exactly where the Biden Admin (including his incoming Justice Dept.) is going to end up on all of Trump's excesses.

 

I THINK, if Trump had just left it at challenging the election results (baselessly), Biden and Co. might have let it pass.

 

But then Trump escalated it with the Georgia Sec. of State inducement to commit election fraud phone call, and then set the country on fire (figuratively) by inciting the attack on Capitol Hill/attempted insurrection.

 

Those latter issues I don't think Biden and his incoming Justice Department can walk away from as regards to Trump.... But time will tell.... no matter how much they're committed to bipartisanship and ending civil strife.

 

Perhaps the Senate will come along, convict Trump on the impeachment charge by 2/3rds vote,  and then ban any future candidacy by majority vote. That would simplify things quite a bit. But I don't think enough of the Republican senators have the gumption for that.

 

 

Edited January 22, 2021 by TallGuyJohninBKK

[pedro01]

On 1/21/2021 at 8:13 AM, EVENKEEL said:

The burning and looting which swept across America recently has been forgiven and forgotten.

 

errr.... no - it's still ongoing....

 

Antifa still in full swing from the left side. Riots ongoing.

On the right - a bit too soon to tell if the Capitol riots were a one off or if they'll be in the streets again soon.

 

 

[onthedarkside]

A post with unsubstantiated and unsourced claims has been removed.

 

[billd766]

51 minutes ago, ExpatOK said:

To stop this uncivil war, joseph should have persuaded Pelosi to drop this second impeachment debacle.  It's clear, though, he wants the uncivil war to continue.

I assume that you mean the civil war that Trump nearly started even before the November 2020 elections.

 

I presume that you have seen nothing wrong in Trump's Tweets encouraging the "Proud Boys" and their ilk to attack the Congress building to stop Pence from announcing the official result. If they could have got hold of Pence they wanted to hang him, in addition to any Democrat Congress persons they could catch.

 

From what I saw of President Biden's speech he is leaving the impeachment where it belongs, which is the Congress and the Senate.

 

Why shouldn't Trump be punished for splitting the USA and attempting to overthrow the incoming government? Is he a sacred person who should never be punished for anything that he has done for the past 4 years.

 

If that is so then you are just another Trump supporter who cannot accept the truth and reality. 

 

 

[nauseus]

56 minutes ago, Jeffr2 said:

To stop this civil war, we need to deprogram a bunch of Trump's supporters.  Especially since many still believe the election was stolen!  Not very smart....

 

Anyway, many of the leaders of the attempted coup are in jail, with more to follow.  And NO pardons from Trump, even though he instigated them to do so.

 

Love the comments from the Proud Boys.  Too funny.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/20/technology/proud-boys-trump.html

 

‘A Total Failure’: The Proud Boys Now Mock Trump

 

Members of the far-right group, who were among Donald Trump’s staunchest fans, are calling him “weak” as more of them were charged for storming the U.S. Capitol.

 

But by this week, the group’s attitude toward Mr. Trump had changed. “Trump will go down as a total failure,” the Proud Boys said in the same Telegram channel on Monday.

 

Deprogram? A horrible word that just doesn't sound very free and democratic. Does it?

[nauseus]

15 minutes ago, billd766 said:

I assume that you mean the civil war that Trump nearly started even before the November 2020 elections.

 

I presume that you have seen nothing wrong in Trump's Tweets encouraging the "Proud Boys" and their ilk to attack the Congress building to stop Pence from announcing the official result. If they could have got hold of Pence they wanted to hang him, in addition to any Democrat Congress persons they could catch.

 

From what I saw of President Biden's speech he is leaving the impeachment where it belongs, which is the Congress and the Senate.

 

Why shouldn't Trump be punished for splitting the USA and attempting to overthrow the incoming government? Is he a sacred person who should never be punished for anything that he has done for the past 4 years.

 

If that is so then you are just another Trump supporter who cannot accept the truth and reality. 

 

 

 

Can you show us any of these tweets, Bill?

[PattayaJames]

On 1/21/2021 at 1:11 AM, Jeffr2 said:

Ok, I'll bite from a troll.  What's left wing lies and misinformation?  Show me one article like that from CNN, BBC, The NY Times, WaPo, etc.

 

Credible sources only.  I'll be waiting.

 

You must be joking.

The above listed "credible sources" are full of left wing lies and misinformation. 

They will hype or bury a story based on their bias political narrative.

 

People see them doing it every day. They are no longer trusted.

 

Media trust hits new low: https://www.axios.com/media-trust-crisis-2bf0ec1c-00c0-4901-9069-e26b21c283a9.html

 

56% of Americans agree with the statement that "Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations."

 

58% think that "most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public."

 

 

 

[Sujo]

9 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

 

You must be joking.

The above listed "credible sources" are full of left wing lies and misinformation. 

They will hype or bury a story based on their bias political narrative.

 

People see them doing it every day. They are no longer trusted.

 

Media trust hits new low: https://www.axios.com/media-trust-crisis-2bf0ec1c-00c0-4901-9069-e26b21c283a9.html

 

56% of Americans agree with the statement that "Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations."

 

58% think that "most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public."

 

 

 

Try linking to your idea of a credible site and see what happens.

[placeholder]

15 minutes ago, PattayaJames said:

 

You must be joking.

The above listed "credible sources" are full of left wing lies and misinformation. 

They will hype or bury a story based on their bias political narrative.

 

People see them doing it every day. They are no longer trusted.

 

Media trust hits new low: https://www.axios.com/media-trust-crisis-2bf0ec1c-00c0-4901-9069-e26b21c283a9.html

 

56% of Americans agree with the statement that "Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations."

 

58% think that "most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public."

 

Not just the mainstream media, but the courts, too.

[xylophone]

2 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Deprogram? A horrible word that just doesn't sound very free and democratic. Does it?

As the old saying goes, "if the cap fits, wear it".

[nauseus]

43 minutes ago, xylophone said:

As the old saying goes, "if the cap fits, wear it".

 

To that, the timeless favourite, 'pot calling kettle' seems to be more appropriate.  

[xylophone]

36 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

To that, the timeless favourite, 'pot calling kettle' seems to be more appropriate.  

My post was in response to the word "deprogram" because it fits in very well with what a psychologist had said, and which I mentioned in one of my previous posts, so I will repeat that for your perusal..

 

"I was tempted to call them nutters/loonies, but a recent article I read puts a different light on it, inasmuch as a lot of the people in movements like QAnon (and ardent trump followers) are not necessarily nutters, but there is another reason for them being there – – they are disturbed in one way or another and as one writer puts it, "What attracts Gilbert and many other people to QAnon isn't just the content of the conspiracy theory itself. It's the community and sense of mission it provides. New QAnon believers are invited to chat rooms and group texts, and their posts are showered with likes and retweets. They make friends and are told that they are not lonely Facebook addicts squinting at zoomed-in paparazzi photos but patriots gathering "intel" for a righteous revolution".

And the stuff they believe in, you just couldn't make it up, for example: – "Like all QAnon faithful, she is convinced that the world is run by a Satanic group of paedophiles that includes top Democrats and Hollywood elites, and that President Donald Trump has spent years leading a top-secret mission to bring these evildoers to justice".

And even more frightening, "This social element also means that QAnon followers aren't likely to be persuaded out of their beliefs with logic and reason alone".

 

So it's going to be very hard to deprogram these poor ignorant individuals, if indeed it is ever possible. That was the basis of my comment.
 

 

 

 

 

Edited January 22, 2021 by xylophone

[candide]

36 minutes ago, xylophone said:

My post was in response to the word "deprogram" because it fits in very well with what a psychologist had said, and which I mentioned in one of my previous posts, so I will repeat that for your perusal..

 

"I was tempted to call them nutters/loonies, but a recent article I read puts a different light on it, inasmuch as a lot of the people in movements like QAnon (and ardent trump followers) are not necessarily nutters, but there is another reason for them being there – – they are disturbed in one way or another and as one writer puts it, "What attracts Gilbert and many other people to QAnon isn't just the content of the conspiracy theory itself. It's the community and sense of mission it provides. New QAnon believers are invited to chat rooms and group texts, and their posts are showered with likes and retweets. They make friends and are told that they are not lonely Facebook addicts squinting at zoomed-in paparazzi photos but patriots gathering "intel" for a righteous revolution".

And the stuff they believe in, you just couldn't make it up, for example: – "Like all QAnon faithful, she is convinced that the world is run by a Satanic group of paedophiles that includes top Democrats and Hollywood elites, and that President Donald Trump has spent years leading a top-secret mission to bring these evildoers to justice".

And even more frightening, "This social element also means that QAnon followers aren't likely to be persuaded out of their beliefs with logic and reason alone".

 

So it's going to be very hard to deprogram these poor ignorant individuals, if indeed it is ever possible. That was the basis of my comment.
 

 

 

 

 

You are right, the social aspect is important. Participating in these social networks and forum give them a sense of recognition, of being valuable. After excluding the opportunists who participate only for their own financial or political interest, most of them are on the low side 're IQ and/or level of information.

They cannot participate in a "normal" forum and post B.S. without being rebuked and qualified as stupid. In alternate universe forums, they get answers such as "It's interesting", "I agree with you", "I think like you!" for whatever nonsense they may post.

 

This social aspect is likely a barrier to coming back to reality. The other problem is that a core of them is completely anchored in an alternate reality, beyond QAnon. They also believe in creationism and in other conspiracy theories such Trump's election fraud scam, computer chips in vaccines, etc.... For this core, I think there's no hope.

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, xylophone said:

My post was in response to the word "deprogram" because it fits in very well with what a psychologist had said, and which I mentioned in one of my previous posts, so I will repeat that for your perusal..

 

"I was tempted to call them nutters/loonies, but a recent article I read puts a different light on it, inasmuch as a lot of the people in movements like QAnon (and ardent trump followers) are not necessarily nutters, but there is another reason for them being there – – they are disturbed in one way or another and as one writer puts it, "What attracts Gilbert and many other people to QAnon isn't just the content of the conspiracy theory itself. It's the community and sense of mission it provides. New QAnon believers are invited to chat rooms and group texts, and their posts are showered with likes and retweets. They make friends and are told that they are not lonely Facebook addicts squinting at zoomed-in paparazzi photos but patriots gathering "intel" for a righteous revolution".

And the stuff they believe in, you just couldn't make it up, for example: – "Like all QAnon faithful, she is convinced that the world is run by a Satanic group of paedophiles that includes top Democrats and Hollywood elites, and that President Donald Trump has spent years leading a top-secret mission to bring these evildoers to justice".

And even more frightening, "This social element also means that QAnon followers aren't likely to be persuaded out of their beliefs with logic and reason alone".

 

So it's going to be very hard to deprogram these poor ignorant individuals, if indeed it is ever possible. That was the basis of my comment.
 

 

 

 

 

 

Well you can go back and see my comment and the post it responded to. The careless use of this word and other similar words by some today is what is really disturbing. 

[nauseus]

20 minutes ago, candide said:

You are right, the social aspect is important. Participating in these social networks and forum give them a sense of recognition, of being valuable. After excluding the opportunists who participate only for their own financial or political interest, most of them are on the low side 're IQ and/or level of information.

They cannot participate in a "normal" forum and post B.S. without being rebuked and qualified as stupid. In alternate universe forums, they get answers such as "It's interesting", "I agree with you", "I think like you!" for whatever nonsense they may post.

 

This social aspect is likely a barrier to coming back to reality. The other problem is that a core of them is completely anchored in an alternate reality, beyond QAnon. They also believe in creationism and in other conspiracy theories such Trump's election fraud scam, computer chips in vaccines, etc.... For this core, I think there's no hope.

 

OMG

[pedro01]

3 hours ago, PattayaJames said:

 

You must be joking.

The above listed "credible sources" are full of left wing lies and misinformation. 

They will hype or bury a story based on their bias political narrative.

 

People see them doing it every day. They are no longer trusted.

 

Media trust hits new low: https://www.axios.com/media-trust-crisis-2bf0ec1c-00c0-4901-9069-e26b21c283a9.html

 

56% of Americans agree with the statement that "Journalists and reporters are purposely trying to mislead people by saying things they know are false or gross exaggerations."

 

58% think that "most news organizations are more concerned with supporting an ideology or political position than with informing the public."

 

 

 

 

 

Yes - but that 58% is just bitter Trump supporters....

 

.....no wait a second....

[candide]

11 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

OMG

I remind you that we are talking about people who believe that the world is run by a Satanic group of paedophiles that includes top Democrats and Hollywood elites, and that President Donald Trump has spent years leading a top-secret mission to bring these evildoers to justice".

[Sujo]

13 minutes ago, nauseus said:

 

Well you can go back and see my comment and the post it responded to. The careless use of this word and other similar words by some today is what is really disturbing. 

Whats disturbing is what trump unleashed. Deprograming from fake news is an apt and correct description.

 

 

[Sujo]

1 minute ago, candide said:

I remind you that we are talking about people who believe that the world is run by a Satanic group of paedophiles that includes top Democrats and Hollywood elites, and that President Donald Trump has spent years leading a top-secret mission to bring these evildoers to justice".

For which many are now finding out was a lie, as usual, and they are turning on each other.

[nauseus]

2 minutes ago, candide said:

I remind you that we are talking about people who believe that the world is run by a Satanic group of paedophiles that includes top Democrats and Hollywood elites, and that President Donald Trump has spent years leading a top-secret mission to bring these evildoers to justice".

 

Oh dear.

[nauseus]

3 minutes ago, Sujo said:

Whats disturbing is what trump unleashed. Deprograming from fake news is an apt and correct description.

 

 

 

Could you be more specific?

[Sujo]

1 minute ago, nauseus said:

 

Could you be more specific?

My response was clear.

[Sujo]

9 minutes ago, candide said:

I remind you that we are talking about people who believe that the world is run by a Satanic group of paedophiles that includes top Democrats and Hollywood elites, and that President Donald Trump has spent years leading a top-secret mission to bring these evildoers to justice".

Exactly, and some think thats normal.

[thai006]

NOT MY ....

[Sujo]

Florida bank closes trumps accounts.

 

https://thehill.com/policy/finance/banking-financial-institutions/535282-florida-bank-says-it-has-closed-trumps-accounts

[billd766]

7 hours ago, nauseus said:

 

Can you show us any of these tweets, Bill?

You wouldn't believe them anyway as they came from the MSM such as the BBC, CNN and several other broadcasters.

 

As for showing them I have no idea how to look up past news clips. I tried once before to find a clip on the BBC which was about 2 weeks old and I gave up in the end. So for me trying to find stuff that is several months old is like winning the lottery. I know that there are some people who do win but I have never actually met any of them.

 

At 76 my long term memory is good, but the short term memory doesn't seem to last more than a week. 

[Opl]

10 hours ago, ExpatOK said:

To stop this uncivil war, joseph should have persuaded Pelosi to drop this second impeachment debacle.  It's clear, though, he wants the uncivil war to continue.

Trump re-tweeted QAnon for months if not years

Trump's QAnon Presidency: A Timeline - Rolling Stone

 

"The Proud Boys, a far-right extremist group, pledged allegiance to President Donald Trump on Tuesday night after he told the group to "stand back and stand by" during the first presidential debate."

Proud Boys celebrate after Trump's debate callout (nbcnews.com)

"“I will be there,” Trump tweeted Sunday, along with a promotional video for the so-called March for Trump that claims it could be “the biggest event in Washington, D.C. history.”

Trump Says He’ll Attend #StopTheSteal Protests—The Proud Boys Say They’ll Be There Too (forbes.com)

Edited January 22, 2021 by Opl

[balo]

Finally the world can get back to some sort of normality.   No more crazy twitter messages from Trump and fake news.   Let us have law and order, and peace. 

 

[Jingthing]

I must say even though it probably came from a speechwriter that describing the division in the U.S. now as an uncivil war resonates really well. It's well understood by now that the U.S. has not been this divided since the actual civil war. But even though American democracy just survived a near death experience with a clearly fascistic dictator wannabe leader and an attempt at a violent self coup to keep him in power, we aren't actually in a literal civil war (yet anyway). Words matter and using the word uncivil to reflect our current deep divisions and seeing each others as enemies puts that reality out on the table. Now how to fix it, well, best of luck to him and all Americans! Because if we don't, then the great American experiment is doomed (and I'm not sure how long we have to turn this around). 

Edited January 22, 2021 by Jingthing

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, billd766 said:

You wouldn't believe them anyway as they came from the MSM such as the BBC, CNN and several other broadcasters.

 

As for showing them I have no idea how to look up past news clips. I tried once before to find a clip on the BBC which was about 2 weeks old and I gave up in the end. So for me trying to find stuff that is several months old is like winning the lottery. I know that there are some people who do win but I have never actually met any of them.

 

At 76 my long term memory is good, but the short term memory doesn't seem to last more than a week. 

 

Tweets are enabled and transmitted via Twitter, Bill.