Jump to content

EU to extend COVID-19 vaccine export controls as AstraZeneca shipment blocked: sources


Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, Rookiescot said:

 

It was you who specifically mentioned the French.

All I did was point out the hypocrisy of Brexiteers complaining about the EU "hoarding" vaccines while the UK went as far as to actually insert a clause in the contract to allow it to hoard the vaccine.

 

No issue at all with taking care of your own country first. 

 

The issue is with rubbishing the vaccine to score political points and then trying to keep as much of the "quasi-ineffective" vaccine as you can.

 

"Hey this UK vaccine is rubbish! But don't give any of it away for gods sake". Not a logical stance. If it's so ineffective, why hoard it? It would be amusing if it wasn't so serious. Let's hope nobody was listening to Macron and decided not to take it. Hugely irresponsible of him to play games with a life saving vaccine in the middle of a pandemic.

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Confused 1
Posted
33 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

No issue at all with taking care of your own country first. 

 

The issue is with rubbishing the vaccine to score political points and then trying to keep as much of the "quasi-ineffective" vaccine as you can.

 

"Hey this UK vaccine is rubbish! But don't give any of it away for gods sake". Not a logical stance. If it's so ineffective, why hoard it? It would be amusing if it wasn't so serious. Let's hope nobody was listening to Macron and decided not to take it. Hugely irresponsible of him to play games with a life saving vaccine in the middle of a pandemic.

 

 

 

I made no comment on what Macron has said.

I pointed out the hypocrisy of accusing others of hoarding vaccine while the UK does it itself.

My point stands.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

The EU is hoarding (by extending export controls of) the AZ vaccine, not Macron. Hope that clarifies.

Neither the EU nor Macron are hoarding anything. 

 

1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

Despite the usual cheerleaders on TV, back in the real world EU citizens have noticed what a screw up the EU has made of this.

Most of EU citizens are better off. 
 

Stop the lies. I know it’s difficult for a Brexiteer. 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
14 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

Neither the EU nor Macron are hoarding anything. 

 

Most of EU citizens are better off. 
 

Stop the lies. I know it’s difficult for a Brexiteer. 

 

 

 

They are extending vaccine controls. You can lie and say they aren't as many times as you like but please check the topic of the thread if you need confirmation.

 

EU citizens are better off than whom in terms of vaccine rollout? Not better than the UK, that's for sure. Check the facts if you don't believe me. We're miles ahead.

 

https://www.thelocal.fr/20210226/6-reasons-frances-covid-vaccine-rollout-has-been-so-slow/

 

image.png.1f46a790a6b1fe558c20f3d10bd149b0.png

  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

They are extending vaccine controls. You can lie and say they aren't as many times as you like but please check the topic of the thread if you need confirmation.

You claimed the EU and France are hoarding vaccines. That’s not true. Provide evidence for you assertion. 

 

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

EU citizens are better off than whom in terms of vaccine rollout?

Better off than without the EU. You were commenting on impact of EU membership on vaccinations, weren’t you? 
 

  • Like 1
Posted
34 minutes ago, Rookiescot said:

 

I made no comment on what Macron has said.

I pointed out the hypocrisy of accusing others of hoarding vaccine while the UK does it itself.

My point stands.

 

Yes probably best you avoid the Macron issue. All a bit embarrassing really.

 

It is not hypocritical to state facts. The EU is hoarding it. I have stated multiple times that I think countries should absolutely vaccinate their own before giving it to others, therefore I am not criticizing this practice from the EU or the UK. So where is the hypocrisy?

 

To clarify for about the 5th time, I am criticizing Macron for claiming AZ was quasi-ineffective in over 65's when this was simply not true. He was scoring political points by lieing about the effectiveness of a vaccine in the middle of a pandemic. Spreading false information to the public about the cure, while keeping as much as he possibly could of the same vaccine! Absolutely shameful behaviour, but no surprise given that it's Macron.

 

If you weren't aware, the UK has already pledged to donate excess vaccines.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-55795297

 

image.png.fd09d19d80b0bcc4356236da0fa8bd75.png

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

You claimed the EU and France are hoarding vaccines. That’s not true. Provide evidence for you assertion. 

 

Better off than without the EU. You were commenting on impact of EU membership on vaccinations, weren’t you? 
 

 

This is getting a bit weird. Have you read the title of the thread?

 

Here is the evidence. The clue is in the headline.

 

 

 

Posted
5 minutes ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

There’s no evidence for the EU or France hoarding anything. 
 

If you want to go back and change your claim to “EU may extend export controls” then we can agree. 

 

OK it appears this is a language issue, maybe English isn't your first language. No problem. Allow me to help.

 

image.png.f66134baae831526c7920f20f1917c66.png

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, stevenl said:

Webster says hoarding is "the compulsion to continually accumulate a variety of items that are often considered useless or worthless by others accompanied by an inability to discard the items without great distress ".

The EU is using the vaccines, therefore this is not hoarding. As you said yourself "I have stated multiple times that I think countries should absolutely vaccinate their own before giving it to others, therefore I am not criticizing this practice from the EU or the UK. ".

 

Often English words can have many definitions. Here is one from the Cambridge dictionary.

 

https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/hoarding

 

image.png.5a4410c9630e62aebd3be4266adbe94e.png

Posted
1 minute ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

So the UK and the US are also hoarding, and many other countries as well, as they are collecting large amounts of vaccines and keep it it for themselves. 
 

 

 

Yes they are.

 

I'm glad you finally got there. 

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 minute ago, welovesundaysatspace said:

I don’t necessarily agree to call that “hoarding”, but then I don’t understand why you’re getting so obsessed about EU countries doing what the UK and other countries are doing. 

 

OK, definitely getting weird in here. I'll try for a 6th time and then bow out.????

 

I have no issue at all with taking care of your own country first. UK, EU, US. All of them. Fine. 

 

The issue is with rubbishing the AZ vaccine and claiming it is "quasi-effective" to score political points, and then trying to keep as much (i.e. hoard) of the same "quasi-ineffective" AZ vaccine as you can.

 

I can't word it any more simply than that, so I won't be clarifying again. If you don't understand, read it 10 times. I'm off for a well deserved beer.????

Posted
8 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yes they are.

 

I'm glad you finally got there. 

So please refrain from using it in a negative sense the way you have been doing, since you also state you agree with this practice.

 

Regarding your other point about hypocrisy, that's called politics.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted
5 hours ago, Rookiescot said:

 

So its OK for the UK to do it because they inserted a hoarding clause in its contract?

There was a disruption in the supply chain in Belgium - this is why there is a delay - it's the only reason why there is a delay.

 

It's OK to do this because the contract was contingent on supplies which failed to arrive - hence the vaccine was not produced. Then they decided that regardless of the failure in Belgium that they (The EU) would like to dip into the UK supplies, quite rightly we told them to go <deleted> themselves.

 

You should really read up on what you're talking about.

 

 

 

  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 hour ago, JonnyF said:

 

Yes probably best you avoid the Macron issue. All a bit embarrassing really.

 

It is not hypocritical to state facts. The EU is hoarding it. I have stated multiple times that I think countries should absolutely vaccinate their own before giving it to others, therefore I am not criticizing this practice from the EU or the UK. So where is the hypocrisy?

 

To clarify for about the 5th time, I am criticizing Macron for claiming AZ was quasi-ineffective in over 65's when this was simply not true. He was scoring political points by lieing about the effectiveness of a vaccine in the middle of a pandemic. Spreading false information to the public about the cure, while keeping as much as he possibly could of the same vaccine! Absolutely shameful behaviour, but no surprise given that it's Macron.

 

If you weren't aware, the UK has already pledged to donate excess vaccines.

 

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-55795297

 

image.png.fd09d19d80b0bcc4356236da0fa8bd75.png

 

 

 

You are doing it again. Desperately trying to steer the thread onto Macron for some reason while quoting someone who has not mentioned Macron at all.

If you have no issues with countries hoarding vaccine why did you reply to me at all?

  • Like 2
Posted
9 minutes ago, ukrules said:

The Euro empire is flexing its muscles.

 

EU first, everyone else last.

 

 

So its OK for the UK to tell the EU to go <deleted> themselves but if you perceive the EU doing the same its wrong?

Sheer hypocrisy. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
3 hours ago, JonnyF said:

 

The issue is with rubbishing the AZ vaccine and claiming it is "quasi-effective" to score political points, and then trying to keep as much (i.e. hoard) of the same "quasi-ineffective" AZ vaccine as you can.

Again, that’s not true. None of the countries that you call “hoarding” something has “rubbished” the vaccine “to score political points”.

 

Some countries have questioned the effectiveness regarding the elderly (>65yo). 

 

Edited by welovesundaysatspace
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...