5 hours ago, joebrown said:

I think you need to read deeper into the subject of Thai Defamation Laws. Even proving something is true will not keep you from being sued for defamation.

It seems you also have to prove that nobody lost any "Face" as a result of your telling the truth about them......

5 hours ago, RobMuir said:

All of us living in Thailand benefit everyday from the Thai migrant labour laws.

 

The houses we live in, the food we eat, the transport, the transport we use, the malls we shop in etc.

 

Calls to ban these products will just end up costing the workers their jobs that are not available in their own third world countries. 

 

It won't affect the very rich owners lifestyles one bit.

 

 

 

 

No doubt you will be enjoy their products then, same, same, life goes on.

Justice delayed is justice denied. Years after he was driven out of the country with frivolous lawsuits, he finally gets exonerated, surprise surprise.

12 hours ago, chilly07 said:

Reduce profits by paying a living wage, provide adequate housing, pay cost of quarantine and then more Thais would get jobs, infection rates would reduce and the consumer would pay the correct price for the product be it pineapples or fish. Whilst your about it reduce the prison population density by building more prisons and reducing the profit from enormously overcrowded prisons. IE make the top 1pc of Thai Society meet the true cost of their greed.

 

It doesn't work like that. Profits in food manufacuring tend to be razor thin thanks (in part) to retailers squeezing them for better cost prices, this then leads producers to cut costs in any way they can.

Now if consumers were willing to pay a fair price for a product then it may go some way to help manufacturers raise standards.