Jump to content

Attorney General’s team promises no release of ‘Joe Ferrari’, six other former cops yet


Recommended Posts

Posted
37 minutes ago, Edwin Cameron said:

You can't even catch and gaol a teenager that's been going on for years because of 'Blatant Corruption's 

Which teenager are you referring to whose case has "been going on for years"?  What case is that?

Posted
6 minutes ago, RafPinto said:

What happened to the whistleblower cop and his lawyer?

Conveniently disappeared.

That never happens.

Posted

Did he not say "He was just doing his Job" - i.e. Extorting monies of people (regardless if they were a criminal element or not - no matter)  Thereby enriching himself, his team and no doubt seniors - Only in Thailand can a simple lowly paid official amass such a wealth (have a nickname like his) and no one asks any questions .

Posted
13 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That's a statement that was not made by the police in the article, whoever decided on the headline made up that little word "yet". 

 

Nowhere in the body of the OP, or the body of the link, was the word "yet" used by the authorities in the context that the OP's headline suggests.

I do believe you will find the headline by association, does in fact become part of the report

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Geoffggi said:
20 hours ago, Liverpool Lou said:

That's a statement that was not made by the police in the article, whoever decided on the headline made up that little word "yet". 

 

Nowhere in the body of the OP, or the body of the link, was the word "yet" used by the authorities in the context that the OP's headline suggests.

Expand  

I do believe you will find the headline by association, does in fact become part of the report

I do believe you will find that the headline, being written by the article's publisher, does not, in fact, become part of the reported police officer's words unless the police are specifically quoted as having said those words.  They weren't.

Posted
On 11/4/2021 at 4:46 PM, Liverpool Lou said:

No, they're not, there all in custody, they're not running free!

 

The prosecutors office is not one person so making a decision to indict in 14 days is not unreasonable and that's all they have to decide, whether there's enough evidence to justify proceeding to court with the case. 

 

They are not ruling on the guilt or otherwise of the accused.

Yes, I can see it now, "video evidence is tainted and may have been unlawfully acquired" there being no admissions and no other evidence we have to dismiss the case, sorry about that. 

  • Heart-broken 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.




×
×
  • Create New...