.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png.8488ab72b8bb2e508209bfe3211b6e08.png)
-
Recently Browsing 0 members
- No registered users viewing this page.
-
Topics
-
-
Popular Contributors
-
Latest posts...
-
19
Rising Concerns Over Weight-Loss Jabs as Dozens of Deaths Reported in UK
My neighbour is obese; he hardly eats anything -
5
Report - First Retirement Extension - my experience at Changwattana 7 Building B (IMM1)
Yes it's valid for a month. Note: for folk obtaining a car + bike license, Transport will accept one original COR and photocopy for second licience -
-
66
Starmer Increases Defense Spending: Cuts Overseas Aid to Pay For It
You should read posts more carefully. This is what I posted: "Alternative viewpoints (not all of which I agree with): * Net zero: Necessary if the life on earth is to continue" Notwithstanding the above, I explained the economic concept of an externality in a long reply to you some months ago. I will not repeat it here but suffice to say, environmental pollution is a prime example of an externality. It has an economic (and social) cost to society which is not borne by the producer or the consumer. Ignoring the obvious social costs - e.g. reduced utility resulting from a poorer quality of life, etc - from a purely economic perspective, the market is distorted. The Clean Air legislation introduced in the UK in the '50s are examples of how the costs of these externalities can be addressed. Many producers, notably the electricity providers, were against this legislation and warned of the dire economic consequences of its' introduction. No doubt, you would have been fully behind these objectors. Fortunately, the governments of the day had the sense to ignore these protests. If they hadn't it is almost unimaginable what the effect would have been like on the capital's economy and, more importantly, on the general welfare of Londoners. -
116
Six-Year-Old Girl in Critical Condition After Brutal Dog Mauling in Nonthaburi
Chihuahua's are evil nasty little b@stards... yet they can't actually chew off a child's face in a single attack... And this is why the breeds I mentioned earlier are so dangerous.... The power they poses is extreme and their breeding combines to a formidable result - people will argue 'they are ok if they are well trained'... I'd argue, why do they have to have the violence 'trained out of them'.... 'family' Dogs should be saft and sappy by nature... The poodle is not capable of ripping someones scalp off their scull, or tearing their face off.... a Pit Bull is.... the comparison you make is night and day. A Poodle is not less dangerous as (than a) Pitbull - thats complete delusion. In the example you use... a poodle bit someone in the face.... its quite likley that if that dog were a pitbull, it would have ripped off the victims face.... there's a huge difference. -
6
The Battle for Democracy: JD Vance Challenges Europe's Political Elites
He is VP Trump has already endorsed him DUH !!!!!
-
-
Popular in The Pub
-
-
.thumb.jpeg.d2d19a66404642fd9ff62d6262fd153e.jpeg)
Recommended Posts