Jump to content

No, you’re not imagining it — package sizes are shrinking


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

Screenshot_1.jpg.0b84537001b98a57a19f70e030398ca1.jpg

Bottles of Gatorade are pictured, left, a 32 fluid ounce and 28 fluid ounce, in Glenside, Pa., Monday, June 6, 2022. (AP Photo/Matt Rourke)

 

It’s the inflation you’re not supposed to see.

 

From toilet paper to yogurt and coffee to corn chips, manufacturers are quietly shrinking package sizes without lowering prices. It’s dubbed “shrinkflation,” and it’s accelerating worldwide.

 

In the U.S., a small box of Kleenex now has 60 tissues; a few months ago, it had 65. Chobani Flips yogurts have shrunk from 5.3 ounces to 4.5 ounces. In the U.K., Nestle slimmed down its Nescafe Azera Americano coffee tins from 100 grams to 90 grams. In India, a bar of Vim dish soap has shrunk from 155 grams to 135 grams.

 

Shrinkflation isn’t new. But it proliferates in times of high inflation as companies grapple with rising costs for ingredients, packaging, labor and transportation.

 

(more)

 

https://apnews.com/article/india-prices-business-d2c8279d39e1304f5623b3a99b56b8cc

 

AP2.jpg.c94501514ec0c4adf2cb00cba0e37b21.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, CharlieH said:

I always thought it was the content that was shrinking not the package size, giving the impression it was the same but actually getting less for your money in most instances.

That's true in many cases, often it was even before these practices already. Which is not only messing with us as consumers but also takes more space in logistics, thus polluting the planet and costs for shipping it.

 

Worst case of all this, they usually first shrink to then later on still do a price hike on top of that. So they take us for a ride twice + make more profit they did beforehand, so it was never about 'covering inflation costs'.


This while the smaller entrepreneurs or those offering products and services do need to raise their prices but are often not able to do so as that would kill their business and employment becomes a better deal.

Edited by ChaiyaTH
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

'Three Musketeers' candy bar used to advertise as 'the candy bar you can share with two other friends.' The bar had three distinct sections so it could be broken into thirds. It's now a normal rectangular bar, smaller than a Snickers bar.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

By the way, I give special credit to those merchants who put price-per-unit on their shelf tags, since price-per-unit is really the only way to compare. 

 

Being an American with my "Super Size Me/Economy Size" mentality.............. I was pretty surprised how often I could buy the smaller sizes in Thailand at cheaper-per-unit prices than the larger sizes.

 

Since packaging and handling cost money.......... and smaller sizes inevitably use more of both............ this made no sense to me (and still doesn't). 

 

(Example: Jack n Jill Cheese Ring snacks. [The best "American flavor" fake cheese snack I've found in the chips/crisps aisle! Lol] I can buy the bulk pack of 12 of the smallest bags............. for 20% cheaper than a single larger bag; a bag that gives me exactly 1 gram more of this succulent cheesy snack, than the 12 smaller bags combined! 555!

 

Want 56 grams? 4 ea. 14g smaller bags for 16 baht vs 1 ea. 57g bag, for 20 baht. Use scissors to quickly open and toss them into a cup, save 20%! 555

 

Does the 4 baht saved mean anything to me? Not really. It's FOUR BAHT! lol But beating the system? Now that.........! Lol!) 

 

Cheers! 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ChaiyaTH said:

That's true in many cases, often it was even before these practices already. Which is not only messing with us as consumers but also takes more space in logistics, thus polluting the planet and costs for shipping it.

 

Worst case of all this, they usually first shrink to then later on still do a price hike on top of that. So they take us for a ride twice + make more profit they did beforehand, so it was never about 'covering inflation costs'.


This while the smaller entrepreneurs or those offering products and services do need to raise their prices but are often not able to do so as that would kill their business and employment becomes a better deal.

Hmmm. 

 

Do you come across a lot of products that don't put the size or weight on the outside of the package? No? 

 

Cuz if they are........... then it's not THEM that's "messing with you." They're telling you exactly what you are getting. 

 

What's happening here, actually, is YOU are being a lazy consumer........... and blaming them for it! 

 

No one ever promised you that nothing would ever change. Indeed, the old adage is as true today as it has ever been........... "The only constant is change!"

 

You as a consumer need to be aware of this. And that's why you......... as the consumer......... need to constantly pay attention! 

 

No one is "messing with us." They tell us on the outside of the package exactly what we'll get for the price we pay. We, then, get to decide for ourselves if that's acceptable, or not. 

 

When my beloved Peanut M&Ms went from 200g to 180g, I knew it right away. Because I pay attention! 

 

If the bottle or can says it contains 330ml, and that's what it contains, then no one is "messing with you."

 

If it says it contains 330ml and DOESN'T............ well, THAT'S a other matter! ????????????

 

Cheers! 

Edited by KanchanaburiGuy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are seeing rampant hyper inflation around the world now. Who do we have to thank for that? Putin, who is completely unhinged, for one. And the massive corporate gouging taking place, using Covid as a cover.

 

We see some of that here, on imported products. So far, I have not seen alot of inflation here. Some. Not alot. Been back to the US a couple of times recently, and it is positively out of control.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, CharlieH said:

I always thought it was the content that was shrinking not the package size, giving the impression it was the same but actually getting less for your money in most instances.

In Thailand 'Cheers' beer are the champions of this. Their 'large' 610ml bottles look bigger than all their competitors which contain more beer; even Beer Archa, the only beer to still contain 640ml.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, WebGuy said:

And all of those snacks, 70g inside and the bag is bigger 10 times filled with air. Psychological games with goods consumers

The air and space are in those chips/crisps bags to ensure you get potato chips when you open them, and not just potato chip DUST

 

But, of course, if you'd prefer the dust......... ????????????

 

This is why many products......... (in America, anyway)......... have the disclaimer.......... "Filled by weight, not by volume."

 

In addition, chips bags are "over-sized" to compensate for pressure changes at different elevations.

 

I once bought two bags of Lay's in Sacramento...... (low elevation)........ and by the time I got to Lake Tahoe........... (high elevation)........... I could have used them for footballs! I was frankly amazed they didn't *POP*  ????????????

 

Had I been going the other way......... my "footballs!" might have turned into worthless floppy sacks, incapable of preventing chip crushing! 

 

DUST! 

 

-----------------

 

Me? As a rule, I try to understand the reasonable and rational explanations......... BEFORE........ I jump to sinister conclusions of greed and deception. But, hey, that's just me! 

 

????????????

 

Cheers! 

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...