Jump to content

U.S. approves $820 million military aid package for Ukraine; Russia says iron curtain is ‘already descending’


Rimmer

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, blazes said:

Sad.  Clearly you have absolutely no knowledge of the history of Ukraine. But, more to the point, no awareness of what part Ukraine plays in America's (weird) obsession with a relatively weak Russia.  Since 1917, and for 30 years since the collapse of the Soviet Union, America has never quite managed to shrug off the nightmare that the "commies" might one day actually "win" the never-ending war that America has needed to "fight" ever since WW2.

 

And in the never-ending war you need input from the Raytheons of this world....

What have you been indluging in?

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, superal said:

No proof . You are a medical person who can give a diagnosis from a video or picture ? 

No specific diagnosis but it's clear that he is a wreck.

Edited by Jingthing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, placeholder said:

Have you considered that the Soviet Union's defeat in Afghanistan might be the more appropriate historical analogy? Remember that's when Americans aided the indigenous people to defeat the Soviet machine. Much like the way the USSR helped the Vietnamese defeat the Americans. And the Iranians helped to undermine the Americans in Iraq. 

Do you get the picture now? Outside aid to locals trumps foreign invaders.

"Indigenous people"? Under a leadership of certain Osama Bin Laden? 

Anyway, not even Wikipedia will present it so.  E.g. the one of Zbigniew Brezinski speaks about an "Afghan Trap" (described in his book The Grand Chessboard). And about his interview with a French journalist that however was later denied...   

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Saanim said:

"Indigenous people"? Under a leadership of certain Osama Bin Laden? 

Anyway, not even Wikipedia will present it so.  E.g. the one of Zbigniew Brezinski speaks about an "Afghan Trap" (described in his book The Grand Chessboard). And about his interview with a French journalist that however was later denied...   

What are you on about? Bin Laden may have plotted the attack on the USA from Afghanistan, but he certainly didn't lead the resistance against US troops in Afghanistan. Afghanis have a long history of successful resistance to foreign invaders. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, blazes said:

Precisely.  Well put, but surely you did not mean it as I have taken it?? 

 

That is, those who cannot remember  America's defeats in Vietnam, Iraq and Afghanistan are condemned to repeat them ad nauseam.....

As pointed out elsewhere here, the circumstances are entirely different. The US could justify attacking Afghanistan (as foolhardy a proposal as that might be, historically speaking), but their adventures in Vietnam and Iraq were clearly disasters. (Somebody here mentioned Raytheon, a point well made.) However, Neville Chamberlain refusing to stand up to Hitler in 1938 broaches issues that go well beyond nationalist hubris or the needs of the military-industrial complex, and these same issues are directly applicable to the situation in Ukraine.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cory1848 said:

As pointed out elsewhere here, the circumstances are entirely different. The US could justify attacking Afghanistan (as foolhardy a proposal as that might be, historically speaking), but their adventures in Vietnam and Iraq were clearly disasters. (Somebody here mentioned Raytheon, a point well made.) However, Neville Chamberlain refusing to stand up to Hitler in 1938 broaches issues that go well beyond nationalist hubris or the needs of the military-industrial complex, and these same issues are directly applicable to the situation in Ukraine.

Don't know what you mean by "the circumstances are entirely different". Militarily speaking, not so much. An indigenous population is opposing invaders and is being aided by outside powers. That pretty much sums up the situations in Vietnam and Iraq.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Mac Mickmanus said:

The same reason why British war ships regularly go close to Russian waters ?

Probably for the same reasons that Russian warships regularly go close to British, Norwegian, Swedish, German, Icelandic waters and the English Channel close to French waters. They probably sail close to US waters as well.

 

They are testing the countries QRA aircraft and ships.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, transam said:

The UK problems with Russian planes are heavy bombers....

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/russisa-raf-typhoons-scramble-b2006736.html

The Tupolev Tu-95 (Russian: Туполев Ту-95; NATO reporting name: "Bear") is a large, four-engine turboprop-powered strategic bomber and missile platform. First flown in 1952, the Tu-95 entered service with the Long-Range Aviation of the Soviet Air Forces in 1956 and was first used in combat in 2015. It is expected to serve the Russian Aerospace Forces until at least 2040.[1] A development of the bomber for maritime patrol is designated Tu-142

 

Russian Bear 'H' Aircraft MOD 45158140.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, placeholder said:

Don't know what you mean by "the circumstances are entirely different". Militarily speaking, not so much. An indigenous population is opposing invaders and is being aided by outside powers. That pretty much sums up the situations in Vietnam and Iraq.

I think the original comment was about the role of the United States. In Iraq and Vietnam, the US was the invader. In Ukraine, the US is helping the indigenous population against the invader.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Saanim said:

"Indigenous people"? Under a leadership of certain Osama Bin Laden? 

Anyway, not even Wikipedia will present it so.  E.g. the one of Zbigniew Brezinski speaks about an "Afghan Trap" (described in his book The Grand Chessboard). And about his interview with a French journalist that however was later denied...   

 

4 hours ago, placeholder said:

What are you on about? Bin Laden may have plotted the attack on the USA from Afghanistan, but he certainly didn't lead the resistance against US troops in Afghanistan. Afghanis have a long history of successful resistance to foreign invaders. 

It seems you have mixed the wars.  My comment was directed on your remark: "Remember that's when Americans aided the indigenous people to defeat the Soviet machine."

And the "indigenous people" were organized by Bin Laden years ago not against USA but along USA in their generous war "to defeat the Soviet machine". Perhaps you should learn a bit more about that, e.g. from The Independent:

 

OsamaBinLaden-Independent.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Saanim said:

 

It seems you have mixed the wars.  My comment was directed on your remark: "Remember that's when Americans aided the indigenous people to defeat the Soviet machine."

And the "indigenous people" were organized by Bin Laden years ago not against USA but along USA in their generous war "to defeat the Soviet machine". Perhaps you should learn a bit more about that, e.g. from The Independent:

 

OsamaBinLaden-Independent.jpg

So, that's just an additional example. How does that support your case that the US is making the same mistake in Ukraine that it made in Iraq and Afghanistan?  And Bin Laden was not the leader of the Afghanis against the Russians. He was one of many fighters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

On 7/2/2022 at 1:29 PM, Hanaguma said:

Actually it doesn't. It shows that both in dollars and in GDP, the US is spending more to defend Ukraine than countries like the UK and Germany. Which is of course ridiculous.   I get that Putin has been made into some mythical boogeyman figure in the media, but reality is different. Whether or not Russia takes the Donbass or whatever other territory matters exactly zero to the big picture of the world. Russia has a GDP somewhere in the range of South Korea. The other Europeans should be able to handle the situation if they choose.

 

You want to find an actual enemy? A country that is worth worrying about? Try China.

And what do you think China is thinking when the world is not stepping up to help Ukraine? 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, placeholder said:

So, that's just an additional example. How does that support your case that the US is making the same mistake in Ukraine that it made in Iraq and Afghanistan?  And Bin Laden was not the leader of the Afghanis against the Russians. He was one of many fighters.

Seems you have mixed me with somebody else. I did not compare the wars, I just reacted on your remark to the Soviet war in Afghanistan.

Perhaps you should read a bit more about that, it's really not a black-and-white story.  Interesting the Brezinski's role and his famous interview he later allegedly denied., however, many sources mentioning that.       

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, IAMHERE said:

The cool aid from America; The west is always right, don't cha know? 

dont understand your post, so you think what putin is doing is ok? or just everything the west does is wrong?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suspect that a lot of people don't seem to understand that the money being spent on arming Ukraine, is money that is being spent on arms and equipment that is manufactured in the US.  I suspect some of those companies have a well-oiled lobby in Congress.  

 

For the Hawkish members of Congress, they see Ukraine as a good testing ground and a financial win.  For the less Hawkish members, it's simply the right thing to do to help a country that has been invaded.   

 

I don't know much about the weapon manufacturers in other countries, but I suspect it's not all that difference.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2022 at 8:29 PM, Hanaguma said:

Actually it doesn't. It shows that both in dollars and in GDP, the US is spending more to defend Ukraine than countries like the UK and Germany. Which is of course ridiculous.   I get that Putin has been made into some mythical boogeyman figure in the media, but reality is different. Whether or not Russia takes the Donbass or whatever other territory matters exactly zero to the big picture of the world. Russia has a GDP somewhere in the range of South Korea. The other Europeans should be able to handle the situation if they choose.

 

You want to find an actual enemy? A country that is worth worrying about? Try China.

Yup...these pesky Chinese are trying to win the race by working harder and smarter.  Most annoyingly all attempts to kneecap them failed so far. On top of that they look different.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This will help the oil sanctions kick in a little more and narrow down the vast amounts of money Russia is still raking in.

 

Price cap on Russian oil to be about half of current price, Kishida says

 

Referring to a joint communique released after a summit of the Group of Seven developed nations late last month, Kishida said during a stump speech in Tokyo that a mechanism would be designed so that Russian oil “will not and cannot be bought at a higher price” than the cap.

The communique said an oil price cap plan could include options such as enabling transportation of Russian seaborne crude oil and petroleum products globally only if the oil is purchased at or below a specified price.

 

https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2022/07/03/national/politics-diplomacy/price-cap-russian-oil-half-current-price-kishida-says/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/2/2022 at 5:45 PM, Hanaguma said:

Maybe Zelensky shouldn't have been so cocky and should have sat down with Russia before everything kicked off.

Sit down with a dictator like Putin? Oh Yeah, we saw how that worked with Hitler.

  • Like 2
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Credo said:

I suspect that a lot of people don't seem to understand that the money being spent on arming Ukraine, is money that is being spent on arms and equipment that is manufactured in the US.  I suspect some of those companies have a well-oiled lobby in Congress.  

 

For the Hawkish members of Congress, they see Ukraine as a good testing ground and a financial win.  For the less Hawkish members, it's simply the right thing to do to help a country that has been invaded.   

 

I don't know much about the weapon manufacturers in other countries, but I suspect it's not all that difference.  

I’m sure that when a politician like Biden weighs whether and how much military aid to send to Ukraine, he calculates several things at once: the financial benefit to US arms companies, the sheer politics of not wanting to come off as Neville Chamberlain, the geopolitical need to contain a rogue Russian state and maintain some sort of Western alliance, and the simple moral imperative to do the right thing. Some of these factors are cynical, and some not. But the job for sure is not easy …

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Cory1848 said:

I’m sure that when a politician like Biden weighs whether and how much military aid to send to Ukraine, he calculates several things at once: the financial benefit to US arms companies, the sheer politics of not wanting to come off as Neville Chamberlain, the geopolitical need to contain a rogue Russian state and maintain some sort of Western alliance, and the simple moral imperative to do the right thing. Some of these factors are cynical, and some not. But the job for sure is not easy …

Love it.

In your long list of things that (laughably) Biden is supposed to "weigh" and "calculate" (surely you jest!), you omit one important little item:  Biden

intimated back in February (while the Russians were all lined up on the border) that the USA could live with a "minor incursion"!!!!

And here we are today....

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2022 at 2:14 AM, placeholder said:

Tell that to Finland,, Norway Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Moldova, Georgia...

Absolutely right. What was the phrase; all "far away countries of which we know little"!

 

And that approach ended well didn't it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

Absolutely right. What was the phrase; all "far away countries of which we know little"!

 

And that approach ended well didn't it?

I've been to four of the countries on that list.  Good people there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.





×
×
  • Create New...