Jump to content

Germany's gas crisis generates nuclear dilemma for ruling Greens


Recommended Posts

Posted

Germany's gas crisis generates nuclear dilemma for ruling Greens

Pipes.jpg
 
 

and Andreas Rinke

 

BERLIN, July 15 (Reuters) - German conservative politicians have revived debate on extending the life of the country's three remaining nuclear power plants, and polls show a rise in public support for the energy source in the face of a possible cut-off of Russian gas.

But an extension is highly sensitive for Germany's ruling Greens party, which grew out of the 1970s anti-nuclear movement.

Germany's three remaining nuclear power plants are scheduled to be shut down by the end of the year after former chancellor Angela Merkel pledged to halt the use of nuclear electricity after the Fukushima nuclear disaster of 2011.

https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/germanys-gas-crisis-generates-nuclear-dilemma-ruling-greens-2022-07-15/

image.jpeg

  • Haha 2
Posted (edited)

*Deleted post edited out*

 

James Carafano is an right wing alarmist and conspiracy theorist who works for the Heritage Foundation, an organization that started out on the right and then went to the extreme right.

 

Drillers are sitting on a huge mound of drilling right thanks to the fire sale of such right during the Trump administration. There is, in fact, a huge backlog.

 

And your comments about refineries is bizarre. Are you claiming Biden is responsible for the lack of frefining capability in the US? He's been in office less 18 months. How many refineries got built during the entire Trump administration?

 

As for the shutting down of nuclear plants in Germany, that was the overwhelmingly popular position of the German electorate. Maybe it was a bad idea, but not the product of some cabal.

 

Maybe when renewables such as wind and solar started their prices were high. But now they produce electricity far more cheaply than coal even when coal was cheap. And now their power is far cheaper than that produced by gas. 

 

Yes, Germany was very foolish in relying on Russian Gas. As Joe Biden pointed out in 2016:

Biden warns Europe against dependency on Russia for heating oil and natural gas

US Vice President Joe Biden warned European countries against becoming too dependent on Russian oil and gas, saying it would be "bad" for Europe.

Biden was specifically referring to the Nord Stream 2 pipeline which is supposed to deliver natural gas from Russia to Germany via the Baltic Sea. He called it "a fundamentally bad deal for Europe," adding that "Europe needs diverse sources of natural gas, not, in our view, a Nord Stream 2 pipeline."

https://www.dw.com/en/biden-warns-europe-against-dependency-on-russia-for-heating-oil-and-natural-gas/a-19503334

And as Obama warned in 2013

Obama tells EU to do more to cut reliance on Russian gas

U.S. President Barack Obama told the European Union on Wednesday it cannot rely on the United States alone to reduce its dependency on Russian energy, as relations with Moscow chill over its seizure of Crimea from Ukraine.

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-eu-summit-idUSBREA2P0W220140326

 

Edited by Scott
  • Like 2
Posted

A post with a dubious source has been removed.  Please make sure you are linking to credible sources. 

 

Off-topic posts pertaining to US politics will be removed.  Stay on topic.

 

Posted

Governments can either come up with a collaborative and urgent plan to tackle the fossil fuel-driven climate emergency that is already wreaking deadly havoc across the globe or keep allowing corporations to pollute the atmosphere without limit, thereby condemning humanity to a grim future.

 

That stark warning comes from United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres, who said Monday: "We have a choice. Collective action or collective suicide."

 

https://www.rawstory.com/collective-action-or-collective-un-chief-pleads-for-real-climate-response/

Posted
4 minutes ago, Stargeezr said:

ozimoron, what a moniker.  Have you seen the graph below? Did you know

that CO2 was a trace gas just like methane?  No well, well.

CO2 percentage of atmosphere.jpg

And what relevance do you believe that the level of CO2 in the atmosphere, or methane, for that matter, has to the issue of global warming?

  • Thanks 1
Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, placeholder said:

And what relevance do you believe that the level of CO2 in the atmosphere, or methane, for that matter, has to the issue of global warming?

I don't believe CO2 in the atmosphere has any relevance to the climate at all.

Just like I don't believe the sea is rising or the sky is falling.

Edited by BritManToo
  • Like 1
Posted
1 hour ago, BritManToo said:

I don't believe CO2 in the atmosphere has any relevance to the climate at all.

Just like I don't believe the sea is rising or the sky is falling.

Any link to evidence for this? Or just a religious belief so no evidence needed?

Posted
4 hours ago, BritManToo said:

I don't believe CO2 in the atmosphere has any relevance to the climate at all.

Just like I don't believe the sea is rising or the sky is falling.

 

Well, what you've got is a problem with physics dating back almost 200 year when the great Irish physicist John Tindall proved ethe warming capacity of CO2. 

 

John Tyndall FRS (/ˈtɪndəl/; 2 August 1820 – 4 December 1893) was a prominent 19th-century Irish physicist. His initial scientific fame arose in the 1850s from his study of diamagnetism. Later he made discoveries in the realms of infrared radiation and the physical properties of air, proving the connection between atmospheric CO2 and what is now known as the greenhouse effect in 1859.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Tyndall

 

As for sea level rise:

 

"Since the early 1990s, satellites carrying radar altimeters have been tracking the changing height of the ocean surface, and show that global mean sea level has risen, on average, by just over 3 mm every year and, worryingly, that this rate of rise has increased in recent years."

https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/New_satellite_data_techniques_reveal_coastal_sea-level_rise#:~:text=Since the early 1990s%2C satellites,has increased in recent years.

 

Satellites show warming is accelerating sea level rise

"Melting ice sheets in Greenland and Antarctica are speeding up the already fast pace of sea level rise, new satellite research shows.

At the current rate, the world’s oceans on average will be at least 2 feet (61 centimeters) higher by the end of the century compared to today, according to researchers who published in Monday’s Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences."

https://apnews.com/article/north-america-science-us-news-ap-top-news-climate-cf2f9386c024449aae126351d6c67cde

 

 

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...