Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
9 hours ago, mania said:

So they are in fact basically agreeing his time in office from 2014 till 2017 was illegal?

Never Happened??

Didn't count???

I don't think so.  Another article said that the rule or the court only came into play in 2017, so they would start counting from then.

Posted

Righteousness? How can that word even be used in the same sentence as this completely partial court? The people consider this court to be a joke. It has nothing to do with justice. No connection whatsoever. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
11 hours ago, mania said:

So they are in fact basically agreeing his time in office from 2014 till 2017 was illegal?

Never Happened??

Didn't count???

Yep. Just like that.

Ain't Thai political magic enigmatic.

Posted
1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

Righteousness? How can that word even be used in the same sentence as this completely partial court? The people consider this court to be a joke. It has nothing to do with justice. No connection whatsoever. 

The court is purely symbolic. Almost noted novel.

The puppet master at work, per usual.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...