Will the tanks be stripped out of their layer of super secret depleted uranium armor prior to delivery in say about 6 months (after Putin's pending spring offensive)? Will the war be still going or made worse by Biden's, Germany's, NATO meddling?

 

Apparently Biden may supply Putin with weaponry now too! Another undeniably outrageous and stellar achievement for Biden. This person Biden defies logic.

 

I can see the headlines now, "US black-hawk gun ships piloted by Russian's destroying US Abrams tanks in a US proxy war..." all on Biden's watch. It's become more than obvious this US proxy war is a money making machine for the US war monger brigade

 

Vladimir Putin plots to seize US weapons from Afghanistan

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/vladimir-putin-plots-to-seize-us-weapons-from-afghanistan/ar-AA16JmRL

1 minute ago, dotcalm said:

Will the tanks be stripped out of their layer of super secret depleted uranium armor prior to delivery in say about 6 months (after Putin's pending spring offensive)? Will the war be still going or made worse by Biden's, Germany's, NATO meddling?

 

Apparently Biden may supply Putin with weaponry now too! Another undeniably outrageous and stellar achievement for Biden. This person Biden defies logic.

 

I can see the headlines now, "US black-hawk gun ships piloted by Russian's destroying US Abrams tanks in a US proxy war..." all on Biden's watch. It's become more than obvious this US proxy war is a money making machine for the US war monger brigade

 

Vladimir Putin plots to seize US weapons from Afghanistan

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/vladimir-putin-plots-to-seize-us-weapons-from-afghanistan/ar-AA16JmRL

Yea right............according to a telegram channel.................

 

"A Kremlin insider claims that the Russian despot is in negotiations with the Taliban to recognise the nation's government.

In return, Putin wants US equipment snatched from Afghanistan by the Taliban to be handed over - according to Telegram channel General SVR - which claims to be fed information by a Kremlin insider."

25 minutes ago, Bkk Brian said:

Yea right............according to a telegram channel.................

 

"A Kremlin insider claims that the Russian despot is in negotiations with the Taliban to recognise the nation's government.

In return, Putin wants US equipment snatched from Afghanistan by the Taliban to be handed over - according to Telegram channel General SVR - which claims to be fed information by a Kremlin insider."

When you stop for a moment and consider how badly Biden has managed his time in office to destroy the country, nothing he does surprises me now. He is just incapable and proves it every day.

So, the weapons, of course Putin will grab them from those only to happy to join the cause whatever it may be and since there is a treasure trove of US armaments, circulating in the hands of unfriendlies this will be another legacy of failure Biden can lay claim to.

 

Report: Biden administration stockpiled weapons in Afghanistan just months before collapse – for the Taliban?

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/report-biden-administration-stockpiled-weapons-in-afghanistan-just-months-before-collapse-for-the-taliban/

Just now, dotcalm said:

When you stop for a moment and consider how badly Biden has managed his time in office to destroy the country, nothing he does surprises me now. He is just incapable and proves it every day.

So, the weapons, of course Putin will grab them from those only to happy to join the cause whatever it may be and since there is a treasure trove of US armaments, circulating in the hands of unfriendlies this will be another legacy of failure Biden can lay claim to.

 

Report: Biden administration stockpiled weapons in Afghanistan just months before collapse – for the Taliban?

https://www.lawenforcementtoday.com/report-biden-administration-stockpiled-weapons-in-afghanistan-just-months-before-collapse-for-the-taliban/

I don't dispute the weapons left in Afghanistan, that's already well known. I dispute a dodgy telegram channel spread unsubstantiated claims.

 

No country in the world recognizes the taliban, not even China or NK. I doubt Russia will do so anytime soon.

Wasn't the word earlier that they are 'too heavy, complicated, and not suitable'? What has changed?

Posts trolling about kangaroos and the replies have been removed. 

12 hours ago, LosLobo said:

The United Nations would dispute your narrative.

 

Suggest you read the UN Charter.

Charter of the United Nations - Wikipedia

Please don't feed the troll. It makes him carry on all the more.

57 minutes ago, StayinThailand2much said:

Wasn't the word earlier that they are 'too heavy, complicated, and not suitable'? What has changed?

What the kangaroos. ????

On 1/24/2023 at 11:53 PM, Pattaya Spotter said:

It seems like the war hawks are in complete control in the Biden administration. 

Correct me if I’m wrong.

 

It’s Putin who has ordered the illegal invasion of Ukraine, while the US has not joined the war, hence it is Putin who is the ‘war hawk’. 

Let’s leave the blame for this illegal war where it belongs, in Moscow.

2 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

I don't dispute the weapons left in Afghanistan, that's already well known. I dispute a dodgy telegram channel spread unsubstantiated claims.

 

No country in the world recognizes the taliban, not even China or NK. I doubt Russia will do so anytime soon.

But, at least he uses a non-biased, factual source in his following post...

 

Law Enforcement Today - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)

2 hours ago, Bkk Brian said:

No country in the world recognizes the taliban, not even China or NK. I doubt Russia will do so anytime soon.

They may not recognize them: recognize them for what?

Maybe the answer lies somewhere in these articles.

 

Putin says Russia needs to work with the Taliban
“Russia needs to work with the Taliban government in Afghanistan, President Vladimir Putin said on Friday at a meeting of a China- and Russia-led security bloc, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO).”

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-says-russia-needs-work-with-taliban-2021-09-17/

 

Outreach to the Taliban pays dividends to Putin
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/16/world/taliban-russia-putin-analysis-intl/index.html

‘Hedging their bets’: Political experts weigh in on China’s growing relations with the Taliban
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/23/china-and-taliban-relations-with-afghanistan-are-tricky-analysts-say.html

 

With economic assets to secure, China embraces the Taliban

Afghanistan’s stability is key to protect a copper mine, oil blocks, $50bn of Belt-and-Road projects in the neighbourhood.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2021/8/17/with-economic-assets-to-secure-china-embraces-the-taliban

 

13 minutes ago, ballpoint said:

But, at least he uses a non-biased, factual source in his following post...

 

Law Enforcement Today - Media Bias/Fact Check (mediabiasfactcheck.com)

Something like the rating for Raw Story and their added disadvantage of "promotion of mild pseudoscience misinformation."

 

 

21 minutes ago, dotcalm said:

Something like the rating for Raw Story and their added disadvantage of "promotion of mild pseudoscience misinformation."

 

 

But you didn’t quote ‘Rawstory’ 

 

Your off topic trolling has wandered into ‘whataboutary’ of your own posts.

 

Very odd behavior.

15 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

But you didn’t quote ‘Rawstory’ 

 

Your off topic trolling has wandered into ‘whataboutary’ of your own posts.

 

Very odd behavior.

What goes around comes around and some here who worship Raw Story and their promotion of "mild pseudoscience misinformation." nonetheless it remains acceptable to use as reference by this forums standards and now you should have a better understanding. I will remind you that i quote from sources that do not promote pseudoscience of any variety as Raw Story does.

 

Nothing odd, just clarifying the structure of accepted norms on this forum when using and quoting sources. Maybe you find mild pseudoscience misinformation acceptable in which case you are not to be trusted and should just ignored by all.

Edited January 26, 20233 yr by dotcalm

3 hours ago, dotcalm said:

What goes around comes around and some here who worship Raw Story and their promotion of "mild pseudoscience misinformation." nonetheless it remains acceptable to use as reference by this forums standards and now you should have a better understanding. I will remind you that i quote from sources that do not promote pseudoscience of any variety as Raw Story does.

 

Nothing odd, just clarifying the structure of accepted norms on this forum when using and quoting sources. Maybe you find mild pseudoscience misinformation acceptable in which case you are not to be trusted and should just ignored by all.

It was you that introduced Raw Story into the discussion, classic ‘Strawman’.

2 hours ago, Chomper Higgot said:

It was you that introduced Raw Story into the discussion, classic ‘Strawman’.

Ok, well you'll just have to deal with it, so find a way.

Remember though, people who deal in pseudoscience, any form thereof cannot be trusted, that still applies. But that point seems to elude you and you seem more intent on getting wound up by statements that you disagree with. It's quite obvious.

9 minutes ago, dotcalm said:

Ok, well you'll just have to deal with it, so find a way.

Remember though, people who deal in pseudoscience, any form thereof cannot be trusted, that still applies. But that point seems to elude you and you seem more intent on getting wound up by statements that you disagree with. It's quite obvious.

Sorry for calling out your ‘Strawman’.

 

 

Trolling meme removed.  

 

9 hours ago, dotcalm said:

They may not recognize them: recognize them for what?

Maybe the answer lies somewhere in these articles.

 

Putin says Russia needs to work with the Taliban
“Russia needs to work with the Taliban government in Afghanistan, President Vladimir Putin said on Friday at a meeting of a China- and Russia-led security bloc, the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO).”

https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/putin-says-russia-needs-work-with-taliban-2021-09-17/

 

Outreach to the Taliban pays dividends to Putin
https://edition.cnn.com/2021/08/16/world/taliban-russia-putin-analysis-intl/index.html

‘Hedging their bets’: Political experts weigh in on China’s growing relations with the Taliban
https://www.cnbc.com/2021/08/23/china-and-taliban-relations-with-afghanistan-are-tricky-analysts-say.html

 

With economic assets to secure, China embraces the Taliban

Afghanistan’s stability is key to protect a copper mine, oil blocks, $50bn of Belt-and-Road projects in the neighbourhood.

 

https://www.aljazeera.com/economy/2021/8/17/with-economic-assets-to-secure-china-embraces-the-taliban

 

Has that got anything at all to do with this topic? Like I said on the above matter  "After more than a year in power, no foreign nation has officially recognized the Taliban government"

 

Now back to your claim, a rumour sourced from a dodgy Russian Telegram channel.

 

12 hours ago, dotcalm said:

 

Vladimir Putin plots to seize US weapons from Afghanistan

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world/vladimir-putin-plots-to-seize-us-weapons-from-afghanistan/ar-AA16JmRL

The best bit, your fantasy based on the above rumour:

 

12 hours ago, dotcalm said:

I can see the headlines now, "US black-hawk gun ships piloted by Russian's destroying US Abrams tanks in a US proxy war..." all on Biden's watch. It's become more than obvious this US proxy war is a money making machine for the US war monger brigade

Keep dreaming and letting everyone here know your darkest desires, all very creepy..........

 

What have you achieved? Nothing but derailing the OP. Congratulations on that. If you can't think of anything to discuss on the Abrams Tanks that the US is planning to send, don't bother getting back to me.

 

 

Edited January 26, 20233 yr by Bkk Brian