AOC under investigation for Met Gala dress reading "Tax The Rich"

[Chomper Higgot]

5 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Depends how she paid for it.

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/03/05/nyregion/aoc-met-gala-house-ethics.html

 

 

I'm sure she's enjoying all the attention anyway.

So not the dress that’s allegedly broken any ethics rules.

 

I’m sure ‘the attention’ is merely a distraction from her work representing the people of her district.

 

Being an intelligent and outspoken woman I’m sure she’s accustomed to the accusations of being ‘attention seeking’, it’s all part of that predictable reaction some men have to intelligent, out spoken women; I believe I’ve mentioned it in the past.

[JonnyF]

4 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

So not the dress that’s allegedly broken any ethics rules.

 

I’m sure ‘the attention’ is merely a distraction from her work representing the people of her district.

 

Being an intelligent and outspoken woman I’m sure she’s accustomed to the accusations of being ‘attention seeking’, it’s all part of that predictable reaction some men have to intelligent, out spoken women; I believe I’ve mentioned it in the past.

Well the dress is not a living entity so No, it cannot break the rules. AOC's payments for the rental of the dress broke them.  

 

I love intelligent women. Attention seeking narcissists? Not so much. 

[placeholder]

8 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Well the dress is not a living entity so No, it cannot break the rules. AOC's payments for the rental of the dress broke them.  

 

I love intelligent women. Attention seeking narcissists? Not so much. 

Once again, you claim she broke the rules. Has that, in fact, been decided?

And once again, you go after alleged motivation. You've got nothing.

[Chomper Higgot]

23 minutes ago, JonnyF said:

Well the dress is not a living entity so No, it cannot break the rules. AOC's payments for the rental of the dress broke them.  

 

I love intelligent women. Attention seeking narcissists? Not so much. 

Allegedly….

 

Not wise to double down on a behavior that has been spotted.

[placeholder]

46 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

Allegedly….

 

Not wise to double down on a behavior that has been spotted.

 

"Just the place for a Snark! I have said it twice:

   That alone should encourage the crew.

Just the place for a Snark! I have said it thrice:

   What I tell you three times is true."

https://www.poetryfoundation.org/poems/43909/the-hunting-of-the-snark

 

That's from Lewis Carroll's great nonsense poem.

Maybe Jonnyf also believes that 3 times does the trick?

Only time will tell.

Edited March 7, 2023 by placeholder

[bendejo]

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

And I didn't know that it had already been decided that the dress broke ethics rules.

The words were in English.  Only.  Done with no regard for other languages.  Clearly bigoted and imperialistic.  If you were a Thai you would be pointing at her.  Next time she needs to have dresses in different languages.

 

It would be interesting to know how many members of US Congress are fluently multi-lingual.  (No exaggerating like they did with W Bush being bilingual, "via con queso!")

 

 

[Dave0206]

On 3/5/2023 at 9:26 AM, proton said:

Nobody hates her, they just laugh at her hysterical nonsense and socialist rants. She wants DC to be a state, but did not even know the constitution would have to be changed and there is zero chance of that happening. She gives morons something to look down on.

Omg ???? pot kettle comes to mind .What exactly are you so afraid of ? This lady as a rule does her homework she is not afraid to speak up for the working class is that a sin?

I am not American but I can not for the life of me figure out why the red states are so blind to vote against there own interests. 

Obama care minimum wage ect ect.

Allowing companies like wall mart to pay wages people can not live on so government needs to help subsidise them it's welfare for the companies its not like thay are bankrupt well except there morals.