Joe Biden says Vladimir Putin has 'clearly committed war crimes

[Social Media 2005]

 

[mania 6597]

Quote

Joe Biden says Vladimir Putin has 'clearly committed war crimes

Joe was doing similar in Syria before the ink was dry after being elected 

[EVENKEEL 12058]

I think joe should check with his handlers before he speaks. He has a history of making remarks others have to walk back.

[placeholder 28790]

20 minutes ago, EVENKEEL said:

I think joe should check with his handlers before he speaks. He has a history of making remarks others have to walk back.

If only there were some independent source that backed up what he said. Like maybe the ICC. 

[Saanim 798]

*Removed post edited out*

 

I think it would be quite difficult to explain it to you. But perhaps you can start to think by yourself:

President of the state that did not allow the prosecutors of the ICC into the country 4 years ago - when they wanted to investigate -  hails the decision of the same ICC today:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/18/biden-hails-decision-icc-arrest-warrant-against-putin

 

Or did the ICC change the personnel?

Edited March 19 by metisdead

[metisdead 11180]

Off topic posts and the off topic replies have been removed. 

[stevenl 32506]

52 minutes ago, Saanim said:

I think it would be quite difficult to explain it to you. But perhaps you can start to think by yourself:

President of the state that did not allow the prosecutors of the ICC into the country 4 years ago - when they wanted to investigate -  hails the decision of the same ICC today:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/mar/18/biden-hails-decision-icc-arrest-warrant-against-putin

 

Or did the ICC change the personnel?

Doesn't change the facts: Putin clearly committed war crimes.

[Saanim 798]

3 hours ago, stevenl said:

Doesn't change the facts: Putin clearly committed war crimes.

To the facts: Is there any independent body that has evidence proving the facts?

 

[Slip 4152]

21 minutes ago, Saanim said:

To the facts: Is there any independent body that has evidence proving the facts?

 

Yes, and they are already on the ground and preparing the case against Putin as a war criminal.  I'm surprised you haven't seen that in the news.  Not on RT?

[heybruce 24876]

18 hours ago, mania said:

Joe was doing similar in Syria before the ink was dry after being elected 

Total BS, which is why you give not source.

[TKDfella 2666]

Anyone here, or abroad, that is going to volunteer to 'cuff' Putin? Isn't he due to take Russia's turn as Pres. of the UN Security Council? Maybe he'll suggest making the Solntsevskaya Bratva a legal institution and hire them as his bodyguards, ha!

[placeholder 28790]

5 hours ago, TKDfella said:

Anyone here, or abroad, that is going to volunteer to 'cuff' Putin? Isn't he due to take Russia's turn as Pres. of the UN Security Council? Maybe he'll suggest making the Solntsevskaya Bratva a legal institution and hire them as his bodyguards, ha!

Russia is due to take its turn as Security Council President. Not Putin,

[scottiejohn 8672]

19 minutes ago, placeholder said:

Russia is due to take its turn as Security Council President. Not Putin,

Isn't Russia and Putin one and the same in Putin's eyes?

[Jingthing 89116]

On 3/19/2023 at 10:03 AM, EVENKEEL said:

I think joe should check with his handlers before he speaks. He has a history of making remarks others have to walk back.

What was the point of that remark other than to broadcast classic right wing attacks that Biden is a puppet of whatever conspiracy theory they're pushing at the moment?

[Jingthing 89116]

On 3/19/2023 at 10:00 AM, mania said:

Joe was doing similar in Syria before the ink was dry after being elected 

Biden was stealing Syrian children that weren't orphans to brainwash them to later fight their own country? 

[Jingthing 89116]

On 3/19/2023 at 8:58 PM, Saanim said:

To the facts: Is there any independent body that has evidence proving the facts?

 

Putin has been openly broadcasting Nazi style war crimes stealing and brainwashing Ukrainian children on Russian state tv!

[Jingthing 89116]

18 hours ago, heybruce said:

Total BS, which is why you give not source.

The Putin apologist attacks on this war crimes charge are remarkably weak. 

[Jingthing 89116]

1 hour ago, scottiejohn said:

Isn't Russia and Putin one and the same in Putin's eyes?

The point is that Putin will not show up at the UN or any other of the nations that will arrest him if he shows up for the rest of his life.

[TKDfella 2666]

12 hours ago, placeholder said:

Russia is due to take its turn as Security Council President. Not Putin,

Yes, I know and that's is implied in my comment (I mentioned Russia before Putin). But also implied is that as Leader he could take the chair.

[onthedarkside 3112]

Troll post removed

[metisdead 11180]

Some off topic posts and the replies have been removed. 

[Longwood50 1478]

I am certainly no fan of Putin but as a U.S.A. citizen I would have to say this is the pot calling the kettle black. 

Since WWII the U.S.A. has engaged in wars all over the world.  In my opinion, none of them warranted. They bombed, shot, napalmed, and sent cruise missles into various regions.  Not because those countries posed a threat, attacked the USA or were of strategic interest.  

At least Putin is attempting to annex a region contiguous to Russia and as I understand it is home to mostly Russian speaking Ukrainians.  That would not be true of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan.   Did the USA make life better for those people.  Save the world for democracy.  No.  Those countries were left worse for the blood and treasure expended by the USA.  

It is said, war is old men lying and young men dying.  

Biden should learn the phrase assuming he still can cognitively that 
people in glass houses should not throw stones. 

[Jingthing 89116]

14 minutes ago, Longwood50 said:

I am certainly no fan of Putin but as a U.S.A. citizen I would have to say this is the pot calling the kettle black. 

Since WWII the U.S.A. has engaged in wars all over the world.  In my opinion, none of them warranted. They bombed, shot, napalmed, and sent cruise missles into various regions.  Not because those countries posed a threat, attacked the USA or were of strategic interest.  

At least Putin is attempting to annex a region contiguous to Russia and as I understand it is home to mostly Russian speaking Ukrainians.  That would not be true of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan.   Did the USA make life better for those people.  Save the world for democracy.  No.  Those countries were left worse for the blood and treasure expended by the USA.  

It is said, war is old men lying and young men dying.  

Biden should learn the phrase assuming he still can cognitively that 
people in glass houses should not throw stones. 

So it's OK with you then if Mexico annexes the American Southwest? Also steals American children to brainwash them? 

[placeholder 28790]

19 minutes ago, Longwood50 said:

I am certainly no fan of Putin but as a U.S.A. citizen I would have to say this is the pot calling the kettle black. 

Since WWII the U.S.A. has engaged in wars all over the world.  In my opinion, none of them warranted. They bombed, shot, napalmed, and sent cruise missles into various regions.  Not because those countries posed a threat, attacked the USA or were of strategic interest.  

At least Putin is attempting to annex a region contiguous to Russia and as I understand it is home to mostly Russian speaking Ukrainians.  That would not be true of Korea, Vietnam, Iraq, or Afghanistan.   Did the USA make life better for those people.  Save the world for democracy.  No.  Those countries were left worse for the blood and treasure expended by the USA.  

It is said, war is old men lying and young men dying.  

Biden should learn the phrase assuming he still can cognitively that 
people in glass houses should not throw stones. 

"At least Putin is attempting to annex a region contiguous to Russia and as I understand it is home to mostly Russian speaking Ukrainians."

Oh, invading and keeping by conquest is better? Really?

[Jingthing 89116]

12 minutes ago, placeholder said:

"At least Putin is attempting to annex a region contiguous to Russia and as I understand it is home to mostly Russian speaking Ukrainians."

Oh, invading and keeping by conquest is better? Really?

Another one that bought the Kremlin propaganda. What language they  speak is irrelevant. Those are stolen lands. End of.

[BritManToo 71649]

12 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Another one that bought the Kremlin propaganda. What language they  speak is irrelevant. Those are stolen lands. End of.

Isn't all of America 'stolen lands'?

[placeholder 28790]

5 minutes ago, BritManToo said:

Isn't all of America 'stolen lands'?

And not so long ago slavery was legal. So if Putin decides to authorize slavery, will your defense of him be that America once had slaves, too. Got any more lame justifications to share with us?

[Longwood50 1478]

3 hours ago, Jingthing said:

So it's OK with you then if Mexico annexes the American Southwest? Also steals American children to brainwash them? 

Well jingthing two things.  From a practical standpoint Mexico is annexing the American Southwest.  

However as said, I am not in favor of Putin but I hardly think the behavior of the USA over the past 70 years puts in on a pedestal to be preaching righteous behavior to any other country. 

 

[Jingthing 89116]

37 minutes ago, Longwood50 said:

Well jingthing two things.  From a practical standpoint Mexico is annexing the American Southwest.  

However as said, I am not in favor of Putin but I hardly think the behavior of the USA over the past 70 years puts in on a pedestal to be preaching righteous behavior to any other country. 

 

Mexico is not annexing the USA in any way.

To me Putin is acting like Hitler but you just want to resort to whataboutism.

[Pouatchee 1041]

6 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Mexico is not annexing the USA in any way.

To me Putin is acting like Hitler but you just want to resort to whataboutism.

Yes and no. Eventually if enough immigrants get across and settle there it can be debated that the Mexicans are taking over the south west. Then again, Mexico did not belong to the Spanish, whose ancestors now make up the majority of the population. For arguments sake the land was stolen from the native Incas etc...

 

Humankind is really good at screwing each other over.