Jump to content

Six more Bidens may have gained from family business schemes: Comer


onthedarkside

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, khokhols said:

Slowly, but surely, the noose tightens around the Biden's crime families neck. When Biden leaves office, maybe Bragg or one of his stooge colleagues will light him and his family up with multiple indictments for half the corrupt Biden clan, all nine members ID'd to date.

 

https://legalinsurrection.com/2023/04/hunter-biden-reportedly-getting-preferential-irs-treatment-per-irs-whistleblower/

 

This recent whistleblower claims DOJ Garland may have provided false testimony to Congress and has offered to testify to Congress and provide sworn testimony and documentary evidence.

 

“A decorated supervisory IRS agent has reported to the Justice Department’s top watchdog that federal prosecutors appointed by Joe Biden have engaged in “preferential treatment and politics” to block criminal tax charges against presidential son Hunter Biden, providing evidence as a whistleblower that conflicts with Attorney General Merrick Garland’s recent testimony to Congress that the decision to bring charges against Biden was being left to the Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney for Delaware….”

 

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/irs-agent-seeks-whistleblower-protections-to-share-allegations-of-mishandling-in-hunter-biden-probe/ar-AA1a4n0T

 

Ask yourself a few things, ie, for one, why has Biden, or no member of his family denied these payments from the CCP or at least explained what they did to earn these payments form communist China. They have not, because there is only one logical conclusion here and in the words of Chairman Comer of the House Oversight Committee: "the walls are closing in on the Biden's..."

 

“Despite serious risks of retaliation, my client is offering to provide you with information necessary to exercise your constitutional oversight function and wishes to make the disclosures in a non-partisan manner to the leadership of the relevant committees on both sides of the political aisle,” Mark Lytle, an attorney for the IRS whistleblower, said in a letter to a handful of Democrats and Republicans leading committees in the House and Senate”.

 
This statement from your source article is so telling(despite  serious risks of retaliation)! The lame stream sycophants or unelected bureaucrats better tone down their rhetoric and let the salt flo Imop.

Thanks khokhols 

 

Edited by riclag
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, riclag said:

“Despite serious risks of retaliation, my client is offering to provide you with information necessary to exercise your constitutional oversight function and wishes to make the disclosures in a non-partisan manner to the leadership of the relevant committees on both sides of the political aisle,” Mark Lytle, an attorney for the IRS whistleblower, said in a letter to a handful of Democrats and Republicans leading committees in the House and Senate”.

 
This statement from your source article is so telling(despite  serious risks of retaliation)! The lame stream sycophants or unelected bureaucrats better tone down their rhetoric and let the salt flo Imop.

Thanks khokhols 

 

Please link to evidence that this guy is a whistleblower in the usual sense of the word. i.e. an employee of the organisation and not some outsider making an allegation without any more evidence than possessed by you or me.

  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, riclag said:

“Despite serious risks of retaliation, my client is offering to provide you with information necessary to exercise your constitutional oversight function and wishes to make the disclosures in a non-partisan manner to the leadership of the relevant committees on both sides of the political aisle,” Mark Lytle, an attorney for the IRS whistleblower, said in a letter to a handful of Democrats and Republicans leading committees in the House and Senate”.

 
This statement from your source article is so telling(despite  serious risks of retaliation)! The lame stream sycophants or unelected bureaucrats better tone down their rhetoric and let the salt flo Imop.

Thanks khokhols 

 

Also from the article

"A final decision rests with US attorney for Delaware David Weiss, a Trump appointee who was kept on to oversee the case."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, candide said:

Also from the article

"A final decision rests with US attorney for Delaware David Weiss, a Trump appointee who was kept on to oversee the case."

What govt organization does Weiss work for and how much OVERSIGHT has his investigation been through!I know the answer to that but it’s worth repeating!


The Whistleblower hopefully can shed some light on that in the committee hearings of investigating the weaponization of Government agencies .


 

 

U.S. attorneys and their offices are part of the Department of Justice. U.S. attorneys receive oversight, supervision, and administrative support services through the Justice Department's Executive Office for United States Attorneys.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney#:~:text=U.S. attorneys and their offices,Office for United States Attorneys.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, riclag said:

What govt organization does Weiss work for and how much OVERSIGHT has his investigation been through!I know the answer to that but it’s worth repeating!


The Whistleblower hopefully can shed some light on that in the committee hearings of investigating the weaponization of Government agencies .


 

 

U.S. attorneys and their offices are part of the Department of Justice. U.S. attorneys receive oversight, supervision, and administrative support services through the Justice Department's Executive Office for United States Attorneys.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Attorney#:~:text=U.S. attorneys and their offices,Office for United States Attorneys.

 

 

 

 

I do hope that the whistleblower actually has genuine substantive proof and not unproven allegations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, billd766 said:

I do hope that the whistleblower actually has genuine substantive proof and not unproven allegations.

As mentioned previously in what some might believe as a reliable news source below ,According to  the DNC research department dont

believe anything that comes

out of James Comer!

So imop if your interested in the truth one would have to hear what the IRS whistleblower has to say in the committee hearing and weigh the debate accordingly from each side ! 


 

MEMORANDUM

To: Interested Parties

From: Austin Dieter, DNC Research

Date: Thursday, November 17, 2022

Subject: MEMO: Conspiracy Theorist, Trump Sycophant, & Proven Liar. Three things to know about James Comer

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

Did you even read that WaPo article that you linked to?

 

It is a "fact checker" article that debunks virtually every claim that Comer is making.

 

As it states:

 

 

I don't think the Maga types are big on reading.

  • Thumbs Up 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Funny things family businesses really. The profits seem to go to family members. A bit like that fellow from New York (name escapes me for the moment), you know, lives on a golf course in Florida nowadays, the chap with orange hair, dealt in property, steaks, owned a university, a casino and lots of other ventures. All tied up with various members of his family.

 

Family businesses - don't really understand them myself. 

 

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Latest updates on possible charges against Hunter

 

"Now, he could be charged with “two misdemeanor counts for failure to file taxes, one felony count of tax evasion related to a business expense for one year of taxes,” and one potential felony charge regarding the 2018 gun purchase, according to the NBC News report, which cited two unnamed senior law enforcement sources."

https://news.yahoo.com/report-authorities-weighed-charges-including-005505746.html

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, khokhols said:

These new facts make the Biden family the GOAT of corruption

The Biden family operated what could be one of the largest influence peddling efforts in history

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/new-facts-make-biden-family-goat-corruption

Oversight is there for a reason, to fulfill a vital function, to provide proof to Americans if Biden is corrupt or not.

 

"The Oversight Committee will continue to pursue additional bank records to follow the Bidens’ tangled web of financial transactions to determine if the Biden family has been targeted by foreign actors and if there is a national security threat," Comer said, vowing to "soon provide the public with more information about what we’ve uncovered to date."

All those of, but no evidence of criminality.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, khokhols said:

Except the FBI had the Biden laptop since 2019 and knew it was not a Russian information op. Acting DNI J Radcliff also confirmed the laptop was not Russian disinformation. The intel community conspired, at the request of Biden/Blinken to write a knowingly false letter to interfere in a federal election, full stop as they (Morell) have admitted as much.

Got evidence that the FBI knew that?

As for Acting DNI Ratcliffe, not exactly a trustworthy person. 

And you know why Ratcliffe was only acting DNI and not DNI? Trump ultimately withdrew his nomination for Ratcliffe to be DNI because he couldn't get enough backing from the Republican controlled Senate.

"Ratcliffe has little experience in national security or national intelligence and is reported to have demonstrated little engagement on the matters as a congressman.[5][6][62] Trump's intent to nominate Ratcliffe became controversial when he was found to have misrepresented his role in prosecuting terrorism and immigration cases.[5][63][64]"

And there's this:

Thirty-five days before the November 2020 election, Ratcliffe declassifed 2016 Russian disinformation that asserted Hillary Clinton had personally approved a scheme to associate Trump with Vladimir Putin and Russian hacking of the Democratic National Committee. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ratcliffe_(American_politician)

This information has been characterized as baseless by a Republican Senate committee. Ratcliffe subsequently acknowledged that he couldn't vouch for its truthfulness.

Now that is genuine abuse by Ratcliffe of Intelligence. He was an official of the US government when he released that information.

 

And you persist in blaming what you call "the intelligence community". As already pointed out, the signatories were ex-employees of intelligence agencies.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, khokhols said:

You have google? Check Cornell Law, and a plethora and multitude of definitions of "election interference"

Stop evading the issue. The Forum's rules are very clear about the obligation of an aseannow member to back up their assertions. Here it is just for your benefit:

Any alleged factual claims must be supported by a valid link to an approved credible source.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/18/2023 at 1:29 PM, SunnyinBangrak said:

Another verifiably false assertion. You might want to inform yourself better on the subject before making false claims. Many "facts" have changed from when the lappy was a hoax.

 

The meetings you guys claimed never happened

 

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/joe-biden-met-14-hunters-business-associates-vice-president

Your “ source “ is Fox News? ????

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, khokhols said:

These new facts make the Biden family the GOAT of corruption

The Biden family operated what could be one of the largest influence peddling efforts in history

https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/new-facts-make-biden-family-goat-corruption

Oversight is there for a reason, to fulfill a vital function, to provide proof to Americans if Biden is corrupt or not.

 

"The Oversight Committee will continue to pursue additional bank records to follow the Bidens’ tangled web of financial transactions to determine if the Biden family has been targeted by foreign actors and if there is a national security threat," Comer said, vowing to "soon provide the public with more information about what we’ve uncovered to date."

Your source is a Fox opinion piece.  Need I say more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, khokhols said:

Blatant election interference, undeniable and irrefutable.

 

https://nypost.com/2023/04/20/biden-campaign-pushed-spies-to-write-false-hunter-laptop-letter/

 

This should be a much bigger story. Where is CNN, MSNBC, all the letter news agencies??

 

According to a former CIA director, the Intelligence Community used its platform to influence the outcome of the 2020 election. This latest development demonstrates even further how elements in the federal government are working to push a political agenda.

 

 

CIA_we lied.jpg

CIA_Morell_2.jpg

Morell stated under oath that "One intent was to share our concern with the American people that the Russians were playing on this issue".  Towards this end he "organized" a letter signed by 50 CIA colleagues which stated the laptop showed the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.  Nobody has contested the assessment of these agents.

 

I think the expression is "Tempest in a tea kettle."

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, khokhols said:

Except the FBI had the Biden laptop since 2019 and knew it was not a Russian information op. Acting DNI J Radcliff also confirmed the laptop was not Russian disinformation. The intel community conspired, at the request of Biden/Blinken to write a knowingly false letter to interfere in a federal election, full stop as they (Morell) have admitted as much.

Provide a source proving that the FBI knew that the information on the laptop was not Russian disinformation.

 

Provide a source proving that Radcliff had confirmed that the information on the laptop was not Russian disinformation, and how he had proven it.

 

Provide a source showing the people signing the letter knew it was false.

 

If you can't do that, you are guilty of libel and spreading disinformation.

 

BTW:  Judging by your low number of posts I suspect you are the reincarnation of a suspended member.  I also suspect you will be suspended again soon.

Edited by heybruce
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's so fun to see the MAGA straw clutching that always happens on these threads.

 

https://www.politicususa.com/2023/04/21/jim-jordan-just-got-busted-with-evidence-of-his-hunter-biden-lies.html

 

Quote

Jim Jordan and House Judiciary Republicans got caught editing witness interviews to smear the Sec. of State and push their Hunter Biden laptop scandal.

 

Edited by Slip
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, heybruce said:

Morell stated under oath that "One intent was to share our concern with the American people that the Russians were playing on this issue".  Towards this end he "organized" a letter signed by 50 CIA colleagues which stated the laptop showed the hallmarks of a Russian disinformation campaign.  Nobody has contested the assessment of these agents.

 

I think the expression is "Tempest in a tea kettle."

Just to be precise: all the signatories were no longer employees of the government when they signed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.








×
×
  • Create New...