placeholder Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, riclag said: Its the truth! Majority counsel 1. Is there any reason you are unable to provide Truthful answers to todays questions? Mr. Shapley . There is not. Well, there are 2 kinds of people who would respond that way: honest people and liars. Or maybe we should use your idea of what is dispositive evidence in trials, too Judge: Mr. Gacy, was there any reason you were unable to provide truthful testimony in the matter of the torture and murder of young men? Gacy: There was not. Judge: Case dismissed! Edited June 23, 2023 by placeholder Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyExpat57 Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Hasn't this been established to be a bunch of liars? Even admitted by their own they are NOT a news outlet? 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
riclag Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 1 minute ago, HappyExpat57 said: Hasn't this been established to be a bunch of liars? Even admitted by their own they are NOT a news outlet? CBS and Forbes can be our friends, too you know ! Open up your eyes to the Truth ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HappyExpat57 Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 1 minute ago, riclag said: CBS and Forbes can be our friends, too you know ! Open up your eyes to the Truth ! That doesn't answer my questions. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heybruce Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 59 minutes ago, Hanaguma said: For sure they do. Also hopefully they confine their prejudices to discussions on the topic of "Biden". They don't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ozimoron Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 44 minutes ago, riclag said: CBS and Forbes can be our friends, too you know ! Open up your eyes to the Truth ! Same old mantra. Are lefties blind or something? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
earlinclaifornia Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 3 hours ago, Hanaguma said: You know, if I had to choose who is smarter between Chinese businessmen and Hunter Biden, well let's just say that it is not a hard choice.... What is your expertise on bribing to make that assumption, prey tell? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chomper Higgot Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 2 hours ago, riclag said: Transcripts of the Internal Revenue Service Whistleblower’s Testimony ! https://waysandmeans.house.gov/smith-testimony-of-irs-employees-reveals-biden-irs-doj-interfered-in-tax-investigation-of-hunter-biden-revealing-preferential-treatment-for-wealthy-and-politically-connected/ Special treatment for the wealthy?! Like defunding the IRS so they can’t collect taxes from the wealthy? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GroveHillWanderer Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 (edited) All we have here as yet, are unsubstantiated allegations of undue deference and interference from two whistleblowers. Firstly, as the AP report on this says: Quote ... it’s unclear whether the conflict they describe amounts to internal disagreement about how to pursue the wide-ranging probe or a pattern of interference and preferential treatment. GOP releases testimony of whistleblowers claiming interference in Hunter Biden case Secondly, even if there was some kind of interference from within, by the FBI or DOJ, over how the investigation should be conducted, that again isn't proof of criminal activity by Hunter or Joe Biden. Edited June 23, 2023 by GroveHillWanderer 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Popular Post billd766 Posted June 23, 2023 Popular Post Share Posted June 23, 2023 2 hours ago, riclag said: Its the truth! Majority counsel 1. Is there any reason you are unable to provide Truthful answers to todays questions? Mr. Shapley . There is not. Transcript source If he says it is true, then it must be true. If Trump says it is true, then it must be true also, yes? If President Biden says it is true, then it must be true also, yes? Where does it go from here? IIRC from here it goes to a grand jury or a special grand jury, composed of 12 randomly picked people (plus perhaps 3 spares). They listen to the evidence and ask questions. After that IIRC they recommend that the prosecution goes forward or not. If it goes forward then it is the prosecutor's job to make a watertight case or give up on it. If the case goes ahead, it goes before a judge and a randomly picked jury. They listen to ALL the evidence, both prosecution and defence, and then deliberate their judgement. They then return to the court and give their verdict, guilty or not guilty. The judge will then pronounce the verdict, and either deal out a penalty or dismiss the case. However the special grand jury, the grand jury and the court jury will not just listen to the whistleblower, but ALL the evidence. If I am not correct, please tell me if I am wrong, where and why. I am always willing to learn. What I have learned over the last few years is not to take anything at face value. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scott Posted June 23, 2023 Share Posted June 23, 2023 Off-topic posts reported and removed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
onthedarkside Posted June 24, 2023 Share Posted June 24, 2023 A post with link to a conspiracy website has been reported and removed. Numerous replies also removed Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
.png.3b3332cc2256ad0edbc2fe9404feeef0.png)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now