Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

51A76C3B-3BE3-4750-9FC0-87A743195EEA.png

 

The Bangkok Metropolitan Administration (BMA) has set aside a space next to the parliament building to accommodate supporters of Move Forward party leader Pita Limjaroenrat, who are expected to show up in droves to offer moral support when the House and the Senate meet on Thursday to select Thailand’s next prime minister.

 

The space, where the BMA’s Kiak Kai administrative centre is located, is capable of accommodating up to 10,000 people. It will be equipped with tents and mobile toilets, provided by the city’s administration.

 

Bangkok Governor Chadchart Sittipunt said today (Monday) that city officials are drafting an edict to open the space to be used for public expression, in line with the democratic system.

 

#news

Full Story: https://www.thaipbsworld.com/bma-prepares-for-pitas-judgement-day-on-thursday/

 

Logo-top-.png

-- © Copyright Thai PBS 2023-07-10
 

- Cigna offers a range of visa-compliant plans that meet the minimum requirement of medical treatment, including COVID-19, up to THB 3m. For more information on all expat health insurance plans click here.

Posted

All at the last minute:

 

The

@EctThailand

has NOT YET decided whether to call the Constitutional Court, seeking a ruling against@Pita_MFP

accusing him of deliberately concealing his shares in an alleged media company and thus running for office despite not eligible to do so. The EC will meet again tmr.

https://twitter.com/SaksithCNA/status/1678341162908942336

 

(1/2) A source from the junta-appointed Senate's committee on political development said on Monday no more than ten senators will support Move Forward Party PM candidate Pita Limjaroenrat as PM on Thursday during the bicameral vote.

(2/2) The source added some senators will oppose the re-voting for Pita on July 19 if he failed the first vote and will cite Parliament regulation number 41 which stated that a re-vote should be done only when there's a reason to believe the outcome would be different.

https://twitter.com/KhaosodEnglish/status/1678329510561972224

 

  • Like 1
  • Confused 2
  • Sad 1
Posted (edited)
21 minutes ago, anchadian said:

will cite Parliament regulation number 41 which stated that a re-vote should be done only when there's a reason to believe the outcome would be different.

the one we can not name said to support the winner, senators should follow the instructions, read the post please

 

Senator asks his peers to support Pita for PM

 

Edited by Mavideol
Posted

Voting on Thursdag the 13th... in France the next day is the National holiday  14th July ( Quatorze Juillet)we all know know what happened years back

Posted
2 hours ago, bannork said:

Yesterday there was a big crowd to welcome him in Supanburi. Today it's Pathum Thani

 

Isn't it just fantastic to see the Thai people loving their PM. ????  Does my heart good. ????

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted
13 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

The space, where the BMA’s Kiak Kai administrative centre is located, is capable of accommodating up to 10,000 people. It will be equipped with tents and mobile toilets, provided by the city’s administration.

Sounds better than thousands of police and army in riot gear.

Posted
14 hours ago, snoop1130 said:

The space, where the BMA’s Kiak Kai administrative centre is located, is capable of accommodating up to 10,000 people. It will be equipped with tents and mobile toilets, provided by the city’s administration.

 

1 hour ago, hotchilli said:

Sounds better than thousands of police and army in riot gear.

Sounds like a ready made place for a "kettle"!

Posted
1 hour ago, herfiehandbag said:

Naive of me I know, but surely wasn't "judgement day" a couple of months ago (!) when the people voted on the matter.

 

MFP won more seats and more votes than any other party. That was known within hours. A coalition was put in place within days.

 

Here we are, two months down the line. The defeated government is still in place, still shows no sign of relinquishing power, and we are still waiting for the Electoral Commission to proceed with or dismiss the ridiculous attempts to rule Pita ineligible.

 

It is absolutely clear that the regime has no intention of honouring the election votes.

 

They have the Senate block.

 

They have the EC and court referrals.

 

They will manufacture a state of emergency pending fresh elections "in due course".

 

They are staying put.

EC certified the elections rather fast. that the parliament met very fast, and now we are in the building of a coalition. So there is no delay. If Pita can build a coalition he can be PM in 2 days. If he can't it may need 2 more weeks till PTP can build a government

Posted
24 minutes ago, h90 said:

EC certified the elections rather fast. that the parliament met very fast, and now we are in the building of a coalition. So there is no delay. If Pita can build a coalition he can be PM in 2 days. If he can't it may need 2 more weeks till PTP can build a government

They have had a coalition since the 16th of May.

 

The delay is due to determined attempts to break it.

 

PTP have, to their credit, largely stood by it.

 

If they had said after the first couple of days"actually we will go into coalition with XYZ, leaving MFP outside, then all would have been sorted within a week, with the unelected Senate's blessing., MFP would by now have been emasculated just as Future Forward was, leaving vast chunks of the electorate without a voice.

 

And I will hazard a guess that you would have acclaimed it as a great victory for democracy!

  • Haha 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

They have had a coalition since the 16th of May.

 

The delay is due to determined attempts to break it.

 

PTP have, to their credit, largely stood by it.

 

If they had said after the first couple of days"actually we will go into coalition with XYZ, leaving MFP outside, then all would have been sorted within a week, with the unelected Senate's blessing., MFP would by now have been emasculated just as Future Forward was, leaving vast chunks of the electorate without a voice.

 

And I will hazard a guess that you would have acclaimed it as a great victory for democracy!

h90 is fond of saying in his country ( Austria) governments are often composed of coalitions from parties that came second, third, fourth. So it's no surprise the party that won the most seats cannot form a government.

However, as far as I know, Austria doesn't have 250 senators, all personally appointed by the previous PM / government, able to vote in the selection of the following PM.

Posted
34 minutes ago, herfiehandbag said:

They have had a coalition since the 16th of May.

 

The delay is due to determined attempts to break it.

 

PTP have, to their credit, largely stood by it.

 

If they had said after the first couple of days"actually we will go into coalition with XYZ, leaving MFP outside, then all would have been sorted within a week, with the unelected Senate's blessing., MFP would by now have been emasculated just as Future Forward was, leaving vast chunks of the electorate without a voice.

 

And I will hazard a guess that you would have acclaimed it as a great victory for democracy!

They don't have any coalition so far.

EC worked fast.

If MFP get dissolved the only right thing to do would be to have new elections. Just continue and ignoring that is not democratic....On the other hand democracy wouldn't be the most important thing for me. Stability is.

Posted
27 minutes ago, bannork said:

h90 is fond of saying in his country ( Austria) governments are often composed of coalitions from parties that came second, third, fourth. So it's no surprise the party that won the most seats cannot form a government.

However, as far as I know, Austria doesn't have 250 senators, all personally appointed by the previous PM / government, able to vote in the selection of the following PM.

No I did not say that. It was once.

But I often said that the Senator appointment is a bad thing. But still they can't get an PM appointed that is undemocratic/has not the majority of MPs behind him. (And I'll apologize if reality proofs me wrong in a few weeks)

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, h90 said:

No I did not say that. It was once.

But I often said that the Senator appointment is a bad thing. But still they can't get an PM appointed that is undemocratic/has not the majority of MPs behind him. (And I'll apologize if reality proofs me wrong in a few weeks)

Flip flopping again i see  (No I did not say that. It was once.)

(They don't have any coalition so far. ) which planet are you living on

Edited by MikeandDow
Posted
4 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

Flip flopping again i see  (No I did not say that. It was once.)

(They don't have any coalition so far. ) which planet are you living on

Definitely I am not on the sample planet as you. You have your own....

You have a coalition when it is voted for......there was no vote yet. We don't know if the coalition partner will vote as they say. Till now it is just verbal agreed between the bosses, but as every MP can vote independent you have a coalition after it is voted for....not before.

 

Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, h90 said:

Definitely I am not on the sample planet as you. You have your own....

You have a coalition when it is voted for......there was no vote yet. We don't know if the coalition partner will vote as they say. Till now it is just verbal agreed between the bosses, but as every MP can vote independent you have a coalition after it is voted for....not before.

 

full of rubish again  what is a MOU the one that was signed and voted on by the coalition  as I told you before do not post rubbish

Edited by MikeandDow
Posted
8 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

full of rubish again  what is a MOU the one that was signed and voted on by the coalition  as I told you before do not post rubbish

a MOU has no legal relevance. What can you do with it? Nothing.

"Memorandum of understanding" if you don't know the meaning...signing a paper that we understand to have a plan....nothing more than an immature gesture.

  • Like 1
  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, h90 said:

  What can you do with it? Nothing.

"Memorandum of understanding" if you don't know the meaning...signing a paper that we understand to have a plan....nothing more than an immature gesture.

A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is a document that describes the broad outlines of an agreement that two or more parties have reached. The primary difference between the two is that a letter of intent is not binding, whereas a memorandum of understanding is considered binding and carries weight in a court of law.

there was a VOTE by the coalition to accept this   you need to go back to school

Edited by MikeandDow
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is a document that describes the broad outlines of an agreement that two or more parties have reached. The primary difference between the two is that a letter of intent is not binding, whereas a memorandum of understanding is considered binding and carries weight in a court of law.

there was a VOTE by the coalition to accept this   you need to go back to school

yeah sure...good luck with the MOU at court....it is useless paper to give it more credit.....as soon as it was signed Thaksin started to undermine it.

The could have made coalition contract with details. They did not.
PTP has already said if Pita doesn't get it in the first vote they drop him....I guess that is not in the MOU.
I guess the speaker PTP friendly speaker wasn't in the MOU as well...

It is nothing.

They have a coalition after the vote in parliament. Soon we'll know so anyway a waste of time to speculate....

btw. silence from the Dems...or did I miss something?

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, h90 said:

yeah sure...good luck with the MOU at court....it is useless paper to give it more credit.....as soon as it was signed Thaksin started to undermine it.

The could have made coalition contract with details. They did not.
PTP has already said if Pita doesn't get it in the first vote they drop him....I guess that is not in the MOU.
I guess the speaker PTP friendly speaker wasn't in the MOU as well...

It is nothing.

They have a coalition after the vote in parliament. Soon we'll know so anyway a waste of time to speculate....

btw. silence from the Dems...or did I miss something?

you need to understand contract law  you flip flop to much  mind you i do find your post very amusing  like a 6yrs old strugling to try to understand.

do you know how whips work ????

 and stop all the bullXXX about Thaskin sick of hearing it

Edited by MikeandDow
Posted
5 minutes ago, MikeandDow said:

you need to understand contract law  you flip flop to much  mind you i do find your post very amusing  like a 6yrs old strugling to try to understand.

do you know how whips work ????

 and stop all the bullXXX about Thaskin sick of hearing it

yes the law...and the MOU goes to court if some MP votes different.....is it lonely on your planet?

And yes Thaksin as nothing to do with PTP......on your planet

Posted
5 minutes ago, h90 said:

yes the law...and the MOU goes to court if some MP votes different.....is it lonely on your planet?

And yes Thaksin as nothing to do with PTP......on your planet

sorry do not understand your answer its gibberish    do you know how whips work????

Posted
46 minutes ago, h90 said:

a MOU has no legal relevance. What can you do with it? Nothing.

"Memorandum of understanding" if you don't know the meaning...signing a paper that we understand to have a plan....nothing more than an immature gesture.

do you know how many business deals worth billions are made based on MOU and/or NDA.... have u have been in business

Posted
2 hours ago, bannork said:

h90 is fond of saying in his country ( Austria) governments are often composed of coalitions from parties that came second, third, fourth. So it's no surprise the party that won the most seats cannot form a government.

However, as far as I know, Austria doesn't have 250 senators, all personally appointed by the previous PM / government, able to vote in the selection of the following PM.

However they were at the front when it came to enthusiastically welcoming a "putsch" back in 1938!

  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, h90 said:

democratic....On the other hand democracy wouldn't be the most important thing for me. Stability is.

Very revealing. But then, I suspect many of us suspected that!

Edited by herfiehandbag
  • Like 1
  • Thumbs Up 1
Posted
11 minutes ago, Mavideol said:

do you know how many business deals worth billions are made based on MOU and/or NDA.... have u have been in business

how many coalition governments are formed on MOUs? Never heard of one

  • Confused 1
Posted (edited)
25 minutes ago, h90 said:

 Never heard of one

go do your reaseach as you do look up whips

 

will help you do your reaseach  couple of examples  ireland, india

Edited by MikeandDow
  • Thanks 1
Posted
22 hours ago, anchadian said:

All at the last minute:

 

The

@EctThailand

has NOT YET decided whether to call the Constitutional Court, seeking a ruling against@Pita_MFP

accusing him of deliberately concealing his shares in an alleged media company and thus running for office despite not eligible to do so. The EC will meet again tmr.

https://twitter.com/SaksithCNA/status/1678341162908942336

 

(1/2) A source from the junta-appointed Senate's committee on political development said on Monday no more than ten senators will support Move Forward Party PM candidate Pita Limjaroenrat as PM on Thursday during the bicameral vote.

(2/2) The source added some senators will oppose the re-voting for Pita on July 19 if he failed the first vote and will cite Parliament regulation number 41 which stated that a re-vote should be done only when there's a reason to believe the outcome would be different.

https://twitter.com/KhaosodEnglish/status/1678329510561972224

 

You've gotta laugh:

BREAKING: Election Commission chairman Ittiporn Boonpracong said Tues the EC will have to meet again tomorrow to conclude whether to forward #Pita Limjaroenrat's ITV shareholding case to the Constitutional Court to rule whether he lacks qualifications to be an MP.

https://twitter.com/KhaosodEnglish/status/1678673306873110528

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.



×
×
  • Create New...