If you were looking for a new relationship today what age gap would you aim for and why?

[NextG]

5 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

It's quite simple.  Your analogy failed.  As I explained.

 

Who said anything about being ugly?  Where did this insult suddenly come from?  Interesting.

 

The more you talk the more you expose yourself.

I said something about ugly. I wrote what I meant and meant what I wrote. Age is not necessarily the issue. It’s not what you do but the way that you do it. 
Your statement with regard to “wokeness” and feminism was just ridiculous and without basis. 

[NextG]

1 minute ago, Muzzique said:

Not in mine they don´t.

You are obviously in the wrong society.

 

Which is your society? Then we can look at the evidence. 

[NextG]

7 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

You keep making the same nonsensical comments and I will keep pointing them out.  ????‍♂️

Ditto ????

[NextG]

8 minutes ago, Muzzique said:

I had a friend who has sadly passed who ran a successful marriage agency in Udon Thani for 25 years. He told me that the most successful matches he made that had strong marriages were the ones with a 22-25 year age gap.

 

That doesn´t mean other age gaps don´t work as it depends on the 2 people, but pitch in that range and you will probably find the right kind of compatibility.

Oh please… what did they have in common other than desperation?

[Muzzique]

3 minutes ago, NextG said:

Which is your society? Then we can look at the evidence. 

I´m with the Co-op

Edited August 2, 2023 by Muzzique

[NextG]

3 minutes ago, Muzzique said:

I´m with the Co-op

☺️
 

[BangkokReady]

10 minutes ago, NextG said:

I said something about ugly. I wrote what I meant and meant what I wrote. Age is not necessarily the issue. It’s not what you do but the way that you do it. 

Age is not the issue in age gap relationships? That's an interesting perspective.

 

Who cares if someone is ugly?

 

You seem to have a bit of an egenda, as suggested by your apparent meaningless contribution and ad-homs.

 

10 minutes ago, NextG said:

Your statement with regard to “wokeness” and feminism was just ridiculous and without basis. 

I disagree.

[BangkokReady]

13 minutes ago, NextG said:

Ditto ????

Such as?

[NextG]

Just now, BangkokReady said:

Age is not the issue in age gap relationships? That's an interesting perspective.

 

Who cares if someone is ugly?

 

You seem to have a bit of an egenda, as suggested by your apparent meaningless contribution and ad-homs.

 

I disagree.

Gosh you really love ‘ad-homs’ or you really are one of life’s victims. Give the phrase a rest ???? We’ve got the point by now. ‘Wokeness’ and feminism are all against you ????

 

Now, with regard to age… it’s not always an issue if you are actually compatible and I’m not talking about affordability here. 

[NextG]

2 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Such as?

It’s happening in real time…

Of course you don’t agree because we are referring to you, as you most certainly fall into the category that we are discussing. 

[BangkokReady]

1 minute ago, NextG said:

Gosh you really love ‘ad-homs’ or you really are one of life’s victims. Give the phrase a rest ????

Well, if all you have are ad-homs, don't be surprised when people point them out to you.

 

1 minute ago, NextG said:

We’ve got the point by now. ‘Wokeness’ and feminism are all against you ????

The only person contacting to talk about these things is you.

 

1 minute ago, NextG said:

Now, with regard to age… it’s not always an issue if you are actually compatible and I’m not talking about affordability here. 

I agree. Age-gap relationships are fine imo.

[BangkokReady]

3 minutes ago, NextG said:

It’s happening in real time…

Hardly. You're not making any sense and I'm pointing that out.

 

3 minutes ago, NextG said:

Of course you don’t agree because we are referring to you, as you most certainly fall into the category that we are discussing. 

Who is we? You're making even less sense now.

 

What point are you even trying to make? All you seem to be doing is trying to ad-hom because you have nothing to say.

[Muzzique]

15 minutes ago, NextG said:

Oh please… what did they have in common other than desperation?

A Nose

[thailandsgreat]

Many Philippine girls played around with foreigners, but finally often got pregnant with Pinoy, sometimes lived together with them and sometimes not.

 

It seems to be the same way in Thai. The girls move in with Thai. Maybe just because it is safer and an average Thai will probably be less likely to dump her for someone younger? Maybe socially more acceptable to be a single mother with a child that does NOT look like it had a foreign father.

 

In Japan it was the reverse. The girls got pregnant with foreigner and then kicked him out. (Some generalization here, naturally.)

 

 

 

 

Edited August 2, 2023 by thailandsgreat

[NextG]

4 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

Hardly. You're not making any sense and I'm pointing that out.

 

Who is we? You're making even less sense now.

 

What point are you even trying to make? All you seem to be doing is trying to ad-hom because you have nothing to say.

If I’m not making any sense, you might want to go to have some tests done. 
You were the one to utilise the term ‘wokeness’ and I challenged you, suggesting that you did not even know what it meant. That it’s simply created to insult. Your replies ever since have been to deflect by using another silly term ‘ad-him’ … which you have utilised in possibly every single post since then ???? A sure sign of someone with nothing new to say. 
 

So let’s get back to discussing your original post shall we? This time without deflection. ‘wokeness’ and feminism. I say that you have written absolute nonsense. What say you? Let’s begin with your definition of ‘wokeness’ and how it applies to age gap relationships. We can move on to feminism afterwards. 

[Lucky Bones]

1 hour ago, spidermike007 said:

20 to 40 years, now that I am an old fart. Why be with someone your own age, if you do not have to endure such a fate? My woman is far younger than me, and she keeps me young. In addition she does not have the disease of a closed mind, and a conventional nature, that so many older women have. Too set in their ways. No thanks. Which one do you prefer?

 

 

Spidey. Stop.

You are making a fool of yourself by posting this.????????

[BangkokReady]

25 minutes ago, NextG said:

If I’m not making any sense, you might want to go to have some tests done. 
You were the one to utilise the term ‘wokeness’ and I challenged you, suggesting that you did not even know what it meant. That it’s simply created to insult. Your replies ever since have been to deflect by using another silly term ‘ad-him’ … which you have utilised in possibly every single post since then ???? A sure sign of someone with nothing new to say. 

You are the one that has been making ad-homs, so you shouldn't be surprised that I pointed that out to you.

 

You didn't actually challenge me on the term wokeness.

 

You talk about Epstein and morality around age-gaps, then claim that age-gaps are ok.

 

You're arguments lack coherence and continuity.

 

Please check the post comments before making erroneous claims about what had already been discussed.

 

25 minutes ago, NextG said:

So let’s get back to discussing your original post shall we? This time without deflection. ‘wokeness’ and feminism. I say that you have written absolute nonsense. What say you? Let’s begin with your definition of ‘wokeness’ and how it applies to age gap relationships. We can move on to feminism afterwards. 

I didn't deflect. I answered you and you started making ad-homs because you had no come back.

 

You also didn't discuss feminism or wokeness.

 

Why should I humour you, when you so clearly seem to be being intellectually dishonest?

 

You ask me one thing, then when I answer you only reply with an ad-hom, then you make up load of nonsense, now you are trying to backtrack and claim that you were asking me about something you weren't.

 

Why should I feed the troll?

[NextG]

18 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

You are the one that has been making ad-homs, so you shouldn't be surprised that I pointed that out to you.

 

You didn't actually challenge me on the term wokeness.

 

You talk about Epstein and morality around age-gaps, then claim that age-gaps are ok.

 

You're arguments lack coherence and continuity.

 

Please check the post comments before making erroneous claims about what had already been discussed.

 

I didn't deflect. I answered you and you started making ad-homs because you had no come back.

 

You also didn't discuss feminism or wokeness.

 

Why should I humour you, when you so clearly seem to be being intellectually dishonest?

 

You ask me one thing, then when I answer you only reply with an ad-hom, then you make up load of nonsense, now you are trying to backtrack and claim that you were asking me about something you weren't.

 

Why should I feed the troll?

Challenge to your use of the term: 

As of yet no reply to that. First things first. 
 

I wrote about age gap relationships based on money and coercion. Age gap relationships based on love and mutual respect are different. 
 

I’ve challenged you multiple times on your usage of ‘wokeness’ and feminism and even though my previous reply was clear in that regard, you still haven’t got around to actually defining the meaning of ‘wokeness’ and explaining what feminism has to do with age gap relationships. Perhaps you can do it this time, without trying to deflect by using ‘ad-hom’ yet again ☺️ Truly a pathetic tactic at this stage ????

 

So we know you feel victimised. Let’s move on from that to discuss your usage of ‘wokeness’ and feminism in the context of age gap relationships. I predict that you cannot and will try to fit ‘ad-hom’ into your next post, as you have no other means to deflect ???? Sad. 

[BangkokReady]

1 hour ago, NextG said:

Challenge to your use of the term: 

As of yet no reply to that. First things first. 
 

I wrote about age gap relationships based on money and coercion. Age gap relationships based on love and mutual respect are different. 
 

I’ve challenged you multiple times on your usage of ‘wokeness’ and feminism and even though my previous reply was clear in that regard, you still haven’t got around to actually defining the meaning of ‘wokeness’ and explaining what feminism has to do with age gap relationships. Perhaps you can do it this time, without trying to deflect by using ‘ad-hom’ yet again ☺️ Truly a pathetic tactic at this stage ????

 

So we know you feel victimised. Let’s move on from that to discuss your usage of ‘wokeness’ and feminism in the context of age gap relationships. I predict that you cannot and will try to fit ‘ad-hom’ into your next post, as you have no other means to deflect ???? Sad. 

I've replied to all your pointless comments. You haven't challenged me on workeness. All you had was a load of ad-homs because you have no point to make.

 

So after all that, you now want to start a new line of questioning, and that is that you suddenly want me to define woke, correct?

[Hummin]

7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Far as I see, the guys with the least morals get the money, the power and the best looking women.

We with morals are the losers, IMO.

 

Why so fixated on age? Shouldn't we be looking for the best person to be with, PERIOD?

If a legal age person is prepared to be with someone that is older, so what? Why should Hugh Heffner or Mick Jagger be the ones to get the hot women, and not us?

 

I was brought up with morals, and chose to be so, but if I had a younger woman as a wife, that's nobody's business except hers and mine.

There is many reasons younger women search out older men, and sure, it can be fun in the beginning, but long lasting love, well that involves alot more than money. Not saying many girls is better off with older men, or her parents who often ar younger than the man, but, there is always som face to cover up. 

 

Anyway, not for me, and thats my take on it. 

[Hummin]

7 hours ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Do you have any evidence to support that? I doubt it's true.

For starters, what Thai woman would marry a farang that they had to support?

 

Evidence where a younger woman is the care taker of an alcholic with low pention? I guess you have seen many toxic relationships as me, and also read some other men explain their view on the women they meet, and stay with. Barely support means they do not contribute to her or her family which is for many families is necessery. If you lived here long enough, you know kids support their parents, not only those who is married or living with a foreigner. 

[NextG]

17 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

I've replied to all your pointless comments. You haven't challenged me on workeness. All you had was a load of ad-homs because you have no point to make.

 

So after all that, you now want to start a new line of questioning, and that is that you suddenly want me to define woke, correct?

I’m beginning to think you have more serious issues…

 

I even included the post wherein I stated that you did not even know what it meant. 
But now everything becomes a little more clear; your repetitive usage of a throwaway phrase, bordering on the obsessive and the inability to define the phrases that you utilise. Perhaps you imagined that you would get a standing ovation from the ‘boys’ for managing to get both ‘wokeness’ and feminism in one paragraph. But by now they are probably cringing in embarrassment at your usage of ‘ad-him’ in EVERY post. That’s just weird.  I think I’ll leave it at that…
 

 

Edited August 2, 2023 by NextG

[BangkokReady]

5 minutes ago, NextG said:

I’m beginning to think you have more serious issues…

 

I even included the post wherein I stated that you did not even know what it meant. 
But now everything becomes a little more clear; your repetitive usage of a throwaway phrase, bordering on the obsessive and the inability to define the phrases that you utilise. Perhaps you imagined that you would get a standing ovation from the ‘boys’ for managing to get both ‘wokeness’ and feminism in one paragraph. But by now they are probably cringing in embarrassment at your usage of ‘ad-him’ in EVERY post. That’s just weird.  I think I’ll leave it at that…

(Oh look, more ad-homs because you lack the ability to interact in a mature and reasoned manner.)

 

Sadly I couldn't view it the link.

 

You saying I don't know what other means, no doubt in the middle of a jumbled ad-hom, is not the same as you challenging me on it or asking for a definition.

 

Do you seriously want me to define "wokeness" now? Obviously I can do it?

[NextG]

17 minutes ago, Hummin said:

Evidence where a younger woman is the care taker of an alcholic with low pention? I guess you have seen many toxic relationships as me, and also read some other men explain their view on the women they meet, and stay with. Barely support means they do not contribute to her or her family which is for many families is necessery. If you lived here long enough, you know kids support their parents, not only those who is married or living with a foreigner. 

What if their parents are alcoholics? Should the foreigner support them too? It’s all a bit too black & white with you. Toxic relationships can happen to people who aren’t alcoholic too. I’ve overheard conversations where the man is trying to convince the woman to at least sell the house he bought and to split the proceeds. No go. Read about it often. 
Low pension is better than no pension. Who knows why that person drinks? Of course they shouldn’t to excess, but then we also know that the fat person shouldn’t be eating all that ice cream. Not everyone is going to have an ideal life. But often, something is better than nothing. 

[NextG]

3 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

(Oh look, more ad-homs because you lack the ability to interact in a mature and reasoned manner.)

 

Sadly I couldn't view it the link.

 

You saying I don't know what other means, no doubt in the middle of a jumbled ad-hom, is not the same as you challenging me on it or asking for a definition.

 

Do you seriously want me to define "wokeness" now? Obviously I can do it?

Okay, so do it. Define it. 

[NextG]

5 minutes ago, BangkokReady said:

(Oh look, more ad-homs because you lack the ability to interact in a mature and reasoned manner.)

 

Sadly I couldn't view it the link.

 

You saying I don't know what other means, no doubt in the middle of a jumbled ad-hom, is not the same as you challenging me on it or asking for a definition.

 

Do you seriously want me to define "wokeness" now? Obviously I can do it?

The irony of calling my post ‘jumbled’ ☺️

[NextG]

3 hours ago, NextG said:

Nothing made up. You made a foolish comment about “wokeness”. Just idiotic, as you don’t even know what it means. 
Followed by an equally vacuous comment on feminism.

Saying that you don’t know what it means IS a challenge ????

It’s obviously a challenge for you to understand anything at all ????

Anyway, hopefully you understand now and can explain your usage of “wokeness” and “feminism” with regard to age difference relationships. What is “wokeness” and how it is related to this conversation on age difference relationships?

[jerrymahoney]

3 hours ago, Lucky Bones said:

Spidey. Stop.

You are making a fool of yourself by posting this.????????

That's OK. At least he didn't go on about persons with high self-esteem or low-self-esteem. (Spoiler: He considers himself a person of high self-esteem.)

[Lucky Bones]

7 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

That's OK. At least he didn't go on about persons with high self-esteem or low-self-esteem. (Spoiler: He considers himself a person of high self-esteem.)

Spoiler accepted on behalf of him today.

Otherwise OK.

Bad post Spidey.????????

[Hummin]

1 hour ago, NextG said:

What if their parents are alcoholics? Should the foreigner support them too? It’s all a bit too black & white with you. Toxic relationships can happen to people who aren’t alcoholic too. I’ve overheard conversations where the man is trying to convince the woman to at least sell the house he bought and to split the proceeds. No go. Read about it often. 
Low pension is better than no pension. Who knows why that person drinks? Of course they shouldn’t to excess, but then we also know that the fat person shouldn’t be eating all that ice cream. Not everyone is going to have an ideal life. But often, something is better than nothing. 

There is many variables that counts in, and no, not everything is black and white.