Trump charged with four counts over 2020 election

[LosLobo]

1 hour ago, heybruce said:

Why not post a link to the actual study, with an appropriate quote from the introduction:

 

"Our research design allows us to infer Americans’ willingness to trade-off democratic principles for other valid but potentially conflicting considerations such as political ideology, partisan loyalty, and policy preferences. We find the U.S. public’s viability as a democratic check to be strikingly limited: only a small fraction of Americans prioritize democratic principles in their electoral choices, and their tendency to do so is decreasing in several measures of polarization, including the strength of partisanship, policy extremism, and candidate platform divergence. Our findings echo classic arguments about the importance of political moderation and cross-cutting cleavages for democratic stability and highlight the dangers that polarization represents for democracy."  https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/american-political-science-review/article/abs/democracy-in-america-partisanship-polarization-and-the-robustness-of-support-for-democracy-in-the-united-states/C7C72745B1AD1FF9E363BBFBA9E18867

 

Americans, and people everywhere, look at the big picture and choose the lesser of two evils.  This problem becomes more acute in hyper-partisan politics.  Hyper-partisan politics were initiated in its current form in the US by the Republicans, Newt Gingrich specifically, in the 1990's, and force voters to choose between extremes.  It's the reason why I'd like to see rank choice voting in America.

 

 

Newt (The Grinch) Gingrich was the lawless Murdoch-sponsored poster boy for Trump and 'hate politics'.

 

I suggest his name is amazingly appropriate for the despicable human being that did more to divide America that anyone else besides Trump.

 

A newt is a swamp inhabitant that dragged itself from the prime-evil ooze and never fully developed to live on land.

 

The Grinch is as a bitter and ill-tempered character disliked by all known for stealing Xmas.

 

A Newt Chronology | The Long March Of Newt Gingrich | FRONTLINE | PBS

 

Burning Down the House: Newt Gingrich, the Fall of a Speaker, and the Rise of the New Republican Party | Department of History (princeton.edu)

Edited August 13, 2023 by LosLobo

[pomchop]

8 hours ago, Danderman123 said:

Next week, Trump will probably be indicted in Fulton County, Georgia.

Here we go to GA...and yet another republican is set to testify as to what he saw and heard from Trump...wow one more amazing republican who has joined the big dem conspiracy and been convinced to tell lies about the man that he voted for....those incompetent dems are sure doing a pretty good job of getting all the republicans to join in the witch hunt.

 

 you might think that gee maybe donnie, hard as it is for trumpers to grasp,  isn't tellling the truth as he threatens every prosecutor, judge, witness and media that dares to suggest that just maybe donnie boy broke a big pile of laws and his fellow republicans are ready to say that under oath...Send more $$ to the really really rich guy that does not need and will never ask for $$...(oh by the way that seems to have been a whopper of a lie if you are keeping count)

 

Former Georgia Lt. Gov. Geoff Duncan (R) told CNN on Saturday that he received a notice to appear before a grand jury in Fulton County — which encompasses parts of Atlanta — on Tuesday morning.

 

“I have no expectations as to the questions, and I’ll certainly answer whatever questions are put in front of me,” Duncan told CNN. “For me, this is a story that is important for Republicans to hear — Americans to hear. Let’s hear the whole truth and nothing but the truth about Donald Trump’s actions and the surrounding cast of characters around him.”

“He’s got a chance to present these facts and say, ‘Hey, I didn’t know what was going on.’ Or what I think reality’s going to be is they knew exactly what they were doing,” Duncan said.

[LosLobo]

2 hours ago, pomchop said:

here is an interesting tid bit i saw recently re Georgia law as relates to criminal pardons....assuming trump were to be convicted of a felony in GA neither him nor any president can pardon him of a Georgia crime....not even the GA governor can do that as it is done by a pardon board....BUT most important is that under GA law nobody can get a pardon until 5 years AFTER they have served the imposed sentence...not even a friendly GA repub gov or pardon board could legally pardon him if he is convicted of crimes there....i bet those GA prison cells are not what donnie boy has in mind...

 

no wonder donnie boy is scared to death of GA Willis..........and to top it off they have donnie on tape in his own words pressuring GA officials to find him votes and also his pal Rudy is on tape lying over and over to GA officials re fraud that did not exist and they knew it was BS...in fact Rudy admitted it was all BS under oath in one of his other trials where he is being sued by the two black election workers that he falsely accused of all kinds of voting crimes ALL of which investigation after investigation proved totally BOGUS...

 

How hard is it to get a pardon in Georgia?

 

 

To qualify for a Pardon for offenses other than sex offenses which require you to be listed on Georgia's Sex Offender Registry: You must have completed all sentence(s) at least five (5) years prior to applying. You must have lived a law-abiding life during the five (5) years prior to applying.

 

You can gauge the level of Trump's fear of going to jail by the number of syllables in his defamation statements.

 

He is obviously terrified of Jack Smith and will now focus more on Judge Fanni Willis, with an indictment possibly due next week.

 

This is his latest on Truth Social today.....

 

'I hear that RACIST Fulton County (Atlanta) District Attorney “Phoney”Fani Willis, who weakly presides over one of the deadliest communities in the U.S., with thousands of murderers, violent criminals & gang members roaming the streets'.

[LosLobo]

2 hours ago, LosLobo said:

Newt (The Grinch) Gingrich was the lawless Murdoch-sponsored poster boy for Trump and 'hate politics'.

 

I suggest his name is amazingly appropriate for the despicable human being that did more to divide America that anyone else besides Trump.

 

A newt is a swamp inhabitant that dragged itself from the prime-evil ooze and never fully developed to live on land.

 

The Grinch is as a bitter and ill-tempered character disliked by all known for stealing Xmas.

 

A Newt Chronology | The Long March Of Newt Gingrich | FRONTLINE | PBS

 

Burning Down the House: Newt Gingrich, the Fall of a Speaker, and the Rise of the New Republican Party | Department of History (princeton.edu)

Newt Gingrich was also subpoenaed before the Grand Jury in this Jan 6th case.

 

Gingrich seems to have played a role in the fake elector conspiracy.

 

I suggest that he and Bannon would be the two top contenders for the unnamed co-conspirator, yet to be indicted, 'political advisor' in Jack Smith's indictment of Trump.

 

Newt Gingrich testified before January 6 grand jury | CNN Politics

 

 

 

Edited August 13, 2023 by LosLobo

[Danderman123]

https://www.mediaite.com/politics/matt-gaetz-shouts-that-only-through-force-do-we-make-any-change-while-standing-beside-trump-in-iowa/

 

Matt Gaetz Shouts That ‘Only Through Force Do We Make Any Change’ While Standing Beside Trump in Iowa

 

Trump is on trial for something like this, right?

[Yellowtail]

I would bet that every leftist here will argue the judge should not recuse herself, and that change of venue is not needed, and that Trump will get a fair trial, but at the same time, every single one would be ready to vote guilty before the trial ever started. 

 

Most (if not all) would lie to get on the jury so they could. 

 

I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe that Trump believed the election was not stolen. No doubt the left will come up with someone that swears that Trump told them he knew that he had lost, but that he was going to take over the government and make himself a dictator for life. 

[ozimoron]

7 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I would bet that every leftist here will argue the judge should not recuse herself, and that change of venue is not needed, and that Trump will get a fair trial, but at the same time, every single one would be ready to vote guilty before the trial ever started. 

 

Most (if not all) would lie to get on the jury so they could. 

 

I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe that Trump believed the election was not stolen. No doubt the left will come up with someone that swears that Trump told them he knew that he had lost, but that he was going to take over the government and make himself a dictator for life. 

If you don't think Cannon should recuse you have no business suggesting she should either.

[LosLobo]

29 minutes ago, Yellowtail said:

I would bet that every leftist here will argue the judge should not recuse herself, and that change of venue is not needed, and that Trump will get a fair trial, but at the same time, every single one would be ready to vote guilty before the trial ever started. 

 

Most (if not all) would lie to get on the jury so they could. 

 

I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe that Trump believed the election was not stolen. No doubt the left will come up with someone that swears that Trump told them he knew that he had lost, but that he was going to take over the government and make himself a dictator for life. 

There is no evidence to suggest that Judge Tanya Chutkan would be anything but competent and unbiased and there is no reason for her to recluse herself unlike Judge Aileen (Loose) Cannon, who does not understand the Constitution.

 

John Lauro suggested that the trial be moved to Virginia for a 'diverse venue that reflects the diverse characteristics of the American People'.

 

Obviously, Virgina only reflects a base that would be favorable to Trump and has the demographics of a predominantly white population.

 

When white supremacy came to Virginia | Brookings

 

 

 

Edited August 13, 2023 by LosLobo

[ozimoron]

Trump can't hire the best people these days it seems.

 

the judge at one point put her face in her hands as accusations were made against the Joe Biden administration for "coming after" the ex-president.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/trump-chutkan-2663525201/

[ozimoron]

The answer to this is very simple. Trump gives voice to racists so they worship him. Simple as that.

 

Bardella noted that Trump promised to "pardon people who participated in the darkest day of our democratic process that we've ever had."

 

"I think so much about the Republican base, this is a base that has put so much on the themes of faith family and freedom, every time there's a holiday involving a military recognition they're the first ones flying the American flags on the F-150s and the Chevy pick up trucks and yet the very thing that those men and women who have sacrificed everything, the very thing that they do that for is the thing that Donald Trump and his band of idiots try to destroy on January 6th."

 

"The cognitive dissonance here is on another level.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/criminal-syndicate-leader-trump/

Edited August 13, 2023 by ozimoron

[heybruce]

2 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I would bet that every leftist here will argue the judge should not recuse herself, and that change of venue is not needed, and that Trump will get a fair trial, but at the same time, every single one would be ready to vote guilty before the trial ever started. 

 

Most (if not all) would lie to get on the jury so they could. 

 

I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe that Trump believed the election was not stolen. No doubt the left will come up with someone that swears that Trump told them he knew that he had lost, but that he was going to take over the government and make himself a dictator for life. 

Even if he believed his lie it's still illegal to commit crimes to "correct" the lie.

 

"Fight like hell" is no more protected speech than "Your money or your life".

[johnnybangkok]

5 hours ago, LosLobo said:

'I hear that RACIST Fulton County (Atlanta) District Attorney “Phoney”Fani Willis, who weakly presides over one of the deadliest communities in the U.S., with thousands of murderers, violent criminals & gang members roaming the streets'.

This man is just the worst. How anyone thinks he is fit for POTUS is beyond me. 

[candide]

3 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I would bet that every leftist here will argue the judge should not recuse herself, and that change of venue is not needed, and that Trump will get a fair trial, but at the same time, every single one would be ready to vote guilty before the trial ever started. 

 

Most (if not all) would lie to get on the jury so they could. 

 

I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe that Trump believed the election was not stolen. No doubt the left will come up with someone that swears that Trump told them he knew that he had lost, but that he was going to take over the government and make himself a dictator for life. 

The 'left' does not need to come up with anything as testimonies have already been collected during the investigation. Just read the indictment, several cases of Republicans or WH staff telling Trump he had lost are cited in it.

[Danderman123]

If the Fulton County DA indicts too many people, she is going to see an army of attorneys representing the defendants. Unfortunately, her office does not have the same firepower as the Feds, so maybe less is more.

[metisdead]

Some off topic posts contravening our Community Standards have been removed.

[candide]

Meanwhile....

Exclusive: Georgia prosecutors have messages showing Trump’s team is behind voting system breach

 

" Last year, a former Trump official testified under oath to the House January 6 select committee that plans to access voting systems in Georgia were discussed in meetings at the White House, including during an Oval Office meeting on December 18, 2020,  that included Trump. 

Six days before pro-Trump operatives gained unauthorized access to voting systems, the local elections official who allegedly helped facilitate the breach sent a “written invitation” to attorneys working for Trump, according to text messages obtained by CNN."

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/13/politics/coffee-county-georgia-voting-system-breach-trump/index.html

 

[Danderman123]

11 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I would bet that every leftist here will argue the judge should not recuse herself, and that change of venue is not needed, and that Trump will get a fair trial, but at the same time, every single one would be ready to vote guilty before the trial ever started. 

 

Most (if not all) would lie to get on the jury so they could. 

 

I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe that Trump believed the election was not stolen. No doubt the left will come up with someone that swears that Trump told them he knew that he had lost, but that he was going to take over the government and make himself a dictator for life. 

Whether Trump believed or not the election was stolen is irrelevant to his defense (except an insanity plea).

 

If you rob a bank because you think the bank stole your money isn't going to protect you against a bank robbery charge.

Edited August 13, 2023 by Danderman123

[Danderman123]

3 hours ago, candide said:

Meanwhile....

Exclusive: Georgia prosecutors have messages showing Trump’s team is behind voting system breach

 

" Last year, a former Trump official testified under oath to the House January 6 select committee that plans to access voting systems in Georgia were discussed in meetings at the White House, including during an Oval Office meeting on December 18, 2020,  that included Trump. 

Six days before pro-Trump operatives gained unauthorized access to voting systems, the local elections official who allegedly helped facilitate the breach sent a “written invitation” to attorneys working for Trump, according to text messages obtained by CNN."

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/08/13/politics/coffee-county-georgia-voting-system-breach-trump/index.html

 

This is very bad news for Trump's legal team from that time period.

[candide]

1 hour ago, Danderman123 said:

This is very bad news for Trump's legal team from that time period.

Well, depending what has been discussed at the Oval Office, it may not be good for Trump either.

[pomchop]

10 hours ago, candide said:

The 'left' does not need to come up with anything as testimonies have already been collected during the investigation. Just read the indictment, several cases of Republicans or WH staff telling Trump he had lost are cited in it.

It is obvious that a lot of people have not yet taken the time to read the 45 page indictment that is really just trump appointed republican after republican testifying under oath as to what they personally saw or heard in interactions with fellow republicans...not a single dem witness is quoted ...so much for the big dem witch hunt...

 

it appears to be his fellow repubs a few of which  are willing to get death threats etc because they are willing to actually tell the truth...too bad that almost all of the republican "leaders" in the house and senate are total cowards as they know that the big lie is exactly that...a big lie

 

takes a lot of courage as the "base" is loaded with nut cases, full of threats, loads of guns, and all fired up over and over by trump repeating the same old lies  that have been disproved over and over by their fellow republicans....it's called a cult where the truth does not matter...only what the cult leader says is the truth....

[pomchop]

14 hours ago, Yellowtail said:

I would bet that every leftist here will argue the judge should not recuse herself, and that change of venue is not needed, and that Trump will get a fair trial, but at the same time, every single one would be ready to vote guilty before the trial ever started. 

 

Most (if not all) would lie to get on the jury so they could. 

 

I have seen nothing that would lead me to believe that Trump believed the election was not stolen. No doubt the left will come up with someone that swears that Trump told them he knew that he had lost, but that he was going to take over the government and make himself a dictator for life. 

and if "someone" does testify that trump admitted he lost (already have) you can bet your glass of kool aide that it will be a republican who was appointed or hired by trump and voted for trump that will testify to that.....if trump or anybody still believes the big lie that the election was stolen that does not mean they are innocent..

 

.frankly it means they refuse to accept the reality that it was proven over and over with investigaton after investigation, recount after recount, court case after case almost all done by republican that the election results were accurate and there was zero evidence of signifcant vote fruad....

 

if you have any proof otherwise than i am sure the world is very anxious to see what you have found that nobody else has been able to find almost 3 years later....

[jerrymahoney]

On 8/9/2023 at 1:35 PM, HappyExpat57 said:

Spoken like a true 45 supporter, using those doggoned alternative facts.

On the evening of NOV 08, 2016, I went to bed early evening in Thailand with the NYTimes political writers claiming that Ms. Hillary Clinton had a 90+% chance of being elected President.

 

When I woke up early the next morning Thai time around 6 PM Eastern US time, the same NYTimes writers were saying that Donald J. Trump had a 90+% chance of being elected President.

 

I never want to have that wind-knocked-out feeling again after realizing just how many people had underestimated DJT. So when I read all the slam-dunk sure-thing type postings on here regarding the three and possibly four criminal indictments, I just say: Maybe.

[HappyExpat57]

36 minutes ago, jerrymahoney said:

On the evening of NOV 08, 2016, I went to bed early evening in Thailand with the NYTimes political writers claiming that Ms. Hillary Clinton had a 90+% chance of being elected President.

 

When I woke up early the next morning Thai time around 6 PM Eastern US time, the same NYTimes writers were saying that Donald J. Trump had a 90+% chance of being elected President.

 

I never want to have that wind-knocked-out feeling again after realizing just how many people had underestimated DJT. So when I read all the slam-dunk sure-thing type postings on here regarding the three and possibly four criminal indictments, I just say: Maybe.

I distinctly remember when JFK was shot. It was the same feeling of dread when 45 won. I honestly tried to manage a stiff upper lip and get behind my president. That was soon obliterated.

 

At the time of this post, I am halfway through reading the court case against this trailer trash in a blue suit and cheap spray tan. It really is convincing. Slam dunk? As close as one can get to it, but nothing is ever sure until the jail cell door slams behind his burgeoning buttocks.

 

If you (collective "you") haven't read it, here it is:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

[jerrymahoney]

1 hour ago, HappyExpat57 said:

I distinctly remember when JFK was shot. It was the same feeling of dread when 45 won. I honestly tried to manage a stiff upper lip and get behind my president. That was soon obliterated.

 

At the time of this post, I am halfway through reading the court case against this trailer trash in a blue suit and cheap spray tan. It really is convincing. Slam dunk? As close as one can get to it, but nothing is ever sure until the jail cell door slams behind his burgeoning buttocks.

 

If you (collective "you") haven't read it, here it is:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

Yes -- I remeber JFK ... and when Nixon won, Reagan won and 2 Bush's won. But as someone who lived in mid-town Manhattan in the 1970's when Donald J.Trump from the outer-boroughs tried to ingratiate himself with the Manhattan elite by being famous-for-being- famous, the notion that this guy was now President was unfathomable.

Edited August 13, 2023 by jerrymahoney

[pomchop]

All it takes is ONE juror in each case and he dodges a bullet no matter how big a pile of evidence is presented...take a look at the OJ case as a good example. 

 

No doubt all the jurors will receive direct and indirect threats spurred on constantly by trump to be carried out by his braind dead cult....it is the closest i can remember to a mafia boss or drug cartel situation....sugar or lead....if u guilty  we will kill you and your entire family...vote not guilty and you will find a big bag of cash under the tree in your yard....how sad is it that so many people seem to cheer on these threats that undermine the very fabric of the country. Mike Pence and others are booed and yelled at simply for saying they will tell the truth as to what they saw and heard under oath. 

 

How much security and for how long would all the jurors have to have round the clock protection from these MAGA foot soldiers.  Being a juror on any of these cases is going to take a lot of courage....and of course Trump will work every angle every lie etc to promote threats of violence against them.

 

  What would repubs do if dems started issuing threats against jurors of death and mayhem if they vote not guilty?  It is disgusting how so many senators and govs and other officials do not go on TV right now and say cut it out with all the threats and attacks.

 

I personally would like to see all the people making these threats including trump and others no matter who they think they are arrested and locked up if warranted.

[nauseus]

1 hour ago, pomchop said:

All it takes is ONE juror in each case and he dodges a bullet no matter how big a pile of evidence is presented...take a look at the OJ case as a good example. 

 

No doubt all the jurors will receive direct and indirect threats spurred on constantly by trump to be carried out by his braind dead cult....it is the closest i can remember to a mafia boss or drug cartel situation....sugar or lead....if u guilty  we will kill you and your entire family...vote not guilty and you will find a big bag of cash under the tree in your yard....how sad is it that so many people seem to cheer on these threats that undermine the very fabric of the country. Mike Pence and others are booed and yelled at simply for saying they will tell the truth as to what they saw and heard under oath. 

 

How much security and for how long would all the jurors have to have round the clock protection from these MAGA foot soldiers.  Being a juror on any of these cases is going to take a lot of courage....and of course Trump will work every angle every lie etc to promote threats of violence against them.

 

  What would repubs do if dems started issuing threats against jurors of death and mayhem if they vote not guilty?  It is disgusting how so many senators and govs and other officials do not go on TV right now and say cut it out with all the threats and attacks.

 

I personally would like to see all the people making these threats including trump and others no matter who they think they are arrested and locked up if warranted.

No doubt all the jurors will receive direct and indirect threats?

 

You can't help yourself, I suppose.

 

[placeholder]

32 minutes ago, nauseus said:

No doubt all the jurors will receive direct and indirect threats?

 

You can't help yourself, I suppose.

 

Right. Absolutely no precedent to support Pornchop's claim that jurors could face death threats in a Trump trial.

 

Donald Trump's jurors on his rape trial have been granted anonymity to avoid death threats

Jurors set to sit on Donald Trump's civil rape trial have been granted anonymity to avoid receiving any potential death threats from his supporters...

In a very unusual move, all jurors will be totally protected to avoid any scrutiny they could face over the high-profile case...

When announcing the decision, District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan said: "It bears mention that Mr Trump repeatedly has attacked courts, judges, various law enforcement officials and other public officials, and even individual jurors in other matters."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1750292/donald-trump-jurors-death-threats-dxus

 

Anonymous jurors’ names to remain secret from Trump and E. Jean Carroll in civil rape case, judge cites threats to Trump’s criminal case judge

 

Within hours of his criminal court arraignment last week, Trump singled out State Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan and his relatives at a Mar-a-Lago speech, alleging their involvement in an unfounded Democratic conspiracy.
Trump’s comments came after Merchan appealed to his lawyers in front of him in court, asking him to tone down recent rhetoric that could lead to civil unrest or violence.
The Daily News reported Friday that those comments came amid a flood of death threats against Merchan, mirroring ones against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whom Trump has also attacked online.

https://archive.ph/yWMbh

https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-e-jean-carroll-donald-trump-civil-rape-case-nyc-20230410-ysk4yaprpnby3o5r6s3wwyf74y-story.html

Edited August 14, 2023 by metisdead
Oversize font reset to normal.

[pomchop]

53 minutes ago, nauseus said:

No doubt all the jurors will receive direct and indirect threats?

 

You can't help yourself, I suppose.

 

they have not even picked the jury yet and trump is posting veiled threats to any and all if you come after me i am coming after you...he can't help himself i suppose that is some kind of joke?

[LosLobo]

4 hours ago, HappyExpat57 said:

I distinctly remember when JFK was shot. It was the same feeling of dread when 45 won. I honestly tried to manage a stiff upper lip and get behind my president. That was soon obliterated.

 

At the time of this post, I am halfway through reading the court case against this trailer trash in a blue suit and cheap spray tan. It really is convincing. Slam dunk? As close as one can get to it, but nothing is ever sure until the jail cell door slams behind his burgeoning buttocks.

 

If you (collective "you") haven't read it, here it is:

https://www.justice.gov/storage/US_v_Trump_23_cr_257.pdf

Also suggest you read this.

 

Ironman Jack Smith's second installment to his epic indictment.

 

Government Submits Reply in Support of Protective Order in Trump Jan. 6 Case | Lawfare (lawfaremedia.org)

[nauseus]

2 hours ago, placeholder said:

Right. Absolutely no precedent to support Pornchop's claim that jurors could face death threats in a Trump trial.

 

Donald Trump's jurors on his rape trial have been granted anonymity to avoid death threats

Jurors set to sit on Donald Trump's civil rape trial have been granted anonymity to avoid receiving any potential death threats from his supporters...

In a very unusual move, all jurors will be totally protected to avoid any scrutiny they could face over the high-profile case...

When announcing the decision, District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan said: "It bears mention that Mr Trump repeatedly has attacked courts, judges, various law enforcement officials and other public officials, and even individual jurors in other matters."

https://www.express.co.uk/news/us/1750292/donald-trump-jurors-death-threats-dxus

 

Anonymous jurors’ names to remain secret from Trump and E. Jean Carroll in civil rape case, judge cites threats to Trump’s criminal case judge

 

Within hours of his criminal court arraignment last week, Trump singled out State Supreme Court Judge Juan Merchan and his relatives at a Mar-a-Lago speech, alleging their involvement in an unfounded Democratic conspiracy.
Trump’s comments came after Merchan appealed to his lawyers in front of him in court, asking him to tone down recent rhetoric that could lead to civil unrest or violence.
The Daily News reported Friday that those comments came amid a flood of death threats against Merchan, mirroring ones against Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg, whom Trump has also attacked online.

https://archive.ph/yWMbh

https://www.nydailynews.com/new-york/nyc-crime/ny-e-jean-carroll-donald-trump-civil-rape-case-nyc-20230410-ysk4yaprpnby3o5r6s3wwyf74y-story.html

It's just more made-up political BS.